- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gubment refuses to release puberty blocker study for kids
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:25 pm to Sofaking2
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:25 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
Yes, let’s experiment on children. Do you hear yourself?
every medicine we have for children was at some point experimented in children.
Puberty blockers were already experimented in children and now they’re being prescribed off label.
I am saying that’s very concerning to me because I doubt there have been adequate studies to know the long term effects.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:32 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Gubment refuses to release puberty blocker study for kids
Democrats are pure diabolical evil scum. We need to stop financing "Fast and Furious" type bill shite. I hope this time someone gets punished for it.
95 children's lives destroyed for this. Any different tha ln what blacks complain about the govt doing??
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
FDA has identified a number of scenarios and considerations that may affect a sponsor’s 139 approach to developing a drug product for use in pediatric patients. Some common ones are 140 described below. 141 142 1. Drugs for Life-Threatening or Severely Debilitating Conditions and Unmet 143 144 145 Early consultation and discussions are particularly important for drugs intended for life- 146 threatening or severely debilitating conditions.24 For these drugs, FDA encourages sponsors to 147 discuss the pediatric plan at pre-investigational new drug application (pre-IND) and end-of-phase 148 1 meetings.25 In some cases, pediatric studies of drugs for life-threatening or severely 149 debilitating conditions that lack adequate therapies might begin earlier than usual in the drug 150 development process. The need for new therapies might justify early trials despite the relative 151 lack of safety and effectiveness information in humans. Pediatric studies might be considered 152 appropriate when prospects of direct benefit to the enrolled children are sufficient to justify the 153 risks.26
From the FDA guidelines on pediatric drug treatments.
When you hear that tranny kids are in danger of committing suicide, this is why. To enable testing (that will be attempted to be manipulated in every possible way) on pediatric patients.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:42 pm to the808bass
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:45 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Puberty blockers were already experimented in children and now they’re being prescribed off label.
I am saying that’s very concerning to me because I doubt there have been adequate studies to know the long term effects.
What medications destroys a childs natural physical growth? Children's futures shouldn't be up for nonreversible experimentation.
Worse part about evil cowards like is that you wouldn't sacrifice your own children "for the cause"
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:48 pm to Tasseo
This is your in-thread reminder that young males who take puberty blockers will almost certainly never have an orgasm.
You read that right.
You read that right.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:50 pm to SammyTiger
Good grief.. yeah, here’s my kid, please put him in the study that’s says these meds will harm him/her b/c I know my child will prove that the study results thus far are wrong
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:00 pm to SammyTiger
I figured your goofy arse would come a running into this thread.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:04 pm to Tasseo
quote:
What medications destroys a childs natural physical growth? Children's futures shouldn't be up for nonreversible experimentation.
I agree with you. we shouldn’t permanently alter children.
There drugs were approved for young girls who start their periods extremely young and they are generally only on them until they’re a little older. The whole point of them was to delay for a bit. not hold puberty off completely.
Now they’re being used for much longer periods of time, and I don’t know if there are any studies on if this is in fact not permanent or what the effects of long term use is. Thats very concerning to me.
Not that we need to do the studies but that we haven’t already done them and they’re prescribing this stuff to kids.
And it’s being billed as “reversible” or “temporary” without any long term data to support that.
quote:
Worse part about evil cowards like is that you wouldn't sacrifice your own children "for the cause"
This is how this interaction is going.
I say i’m concerned about the safety of these drugs because there haven’t been studies on long term effects.
you scream at me for being evil because I want kids to take these drugs.
Do you understand how new medicines get approved? Do you think children should have any medicine?
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:25 pm to Night Vision
Trust the science! Well... the "science" we'll let you see.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:30 pm to SammyTiger
Do you understand how studies are done and when they expand the number of participants or shut them down? Why are you so biased to find the positive outcomes on a puberty blocker for young people?
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:16 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Do you understand how new medicines get approved? Do you think children should have any medicine?
This has nothing to do with anything. As this isn't medication. We shouldn't be sexually destroying children. Point.Blank.
A moral civilization does not do this nor does it try to experiment to "figire it out".
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:20 pm to shamrock
quote:
Why are you so biased to find the positive outcomes on a puberty blocker for young people?
I am not
I literally have said I am concerned about hot they’re being prescribed without any thought to the long term effects which are unknown
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 10/24/24 at 2:09 am to shamrock
quote:
Good grief.. yeah, here’s my kid, please put him in the study that’s says these meds will harm him/her b/c I know my child will prove that the study results thus far are wrong
1. These meds are already being prescribed, I am just saying someone needs to check back in. I think it’s being falsely labeled as reversible and the public isn’t being made aware of any issue kids have if they choose to go off these meds after years.
2. No one is making anyone sign up for these studies
3. Again, do yall know how any medicine for kids gets made? I wouldn't sign my kid up for any of them but we do have clinical trials with kids.
Posted on 10/24/24 at 5:30 am to SammyTiger
I think the doctor is well within her rights to not release the study results.
As long as she immediately pays back every penny of the millions of tax $$ that she took to do the study.
And she has to pay interest, the same penalties and fees the IRS would charge me or you.
That study was funded by the taxpayer, it belongs to the taxpayer, it’s public property. Release it, or pay back the money. Easy choice.
As long as she immediately pays back every penny of the millions of tax $$ that she took to do the study.
And she has to pay interest, the same penalties and fees the IRS would charge me or you.
That study was funded by the taxpayer, it belongs to the taxpayer, it’s public property. Release it, or pay back the money. Easy choice.
Popular
Back to top

2







