Started By
Message

re: Gubment refuses to release puberty blocker study for kids

Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:25 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79393 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

Yes, let’s experiment on children. Do you hear yourself?


every medicine we have for children was at some point experimented in children.

Puberty blockers were already experimented in children and now they’re being prescribed off label.

I am saying that’s very concerning to me because I doubt there have been adequate studies to know the long term effects.
Posted by Tasseo
Member since Feb 2024
3252 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Gubment refuses to release puberty blocker study for kids

Democrats are pure diabolical evil scum. We need to stop financing "Fast and Furious" type bill shite. I hope this time someone gets punished for it.

95 children's lives destroyed for this. Any different tha ln what blacks complain about the govt doing??
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 7:34 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128723 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

FDA has identified a number of scenarios and considerations that may affect a sponsor’s 139 approach to developing a drug product for use in pediatric patients. Some common ones are 140 described below. 141 142 1. Drugs for Life-Threatening or Severely Debilitating Conditions and Unmet 143 144 145 Early consultation and discussions are particularly important for drugs intended for life- 146 threatening or severely debilitating conditions.24 For these drugs, FDA encourages sponsors to 147 discuss the pediatric plan at pre-investigational new drug application (pre-IND) and end-of-phase 148 1 meetings.25 In some cases, pediatric studies of drugs for life-threatening or severely 149 debilitating conditions that lack adequate therapies might begin earlier than usual in the drug 150 development process. The need for new therapies might justify early trials despite the relative 151 lack of safety and effectiveness information in humans. Pediatric studies might be considered 152 appropriate when prospects of direct benefit to the enrolled children are sufficient to justify the 153 risks.26


From the FDA guidelines on pediatric drug treatments.

When you hear that tranny kids are in danger of committing suicide, this is why. To enable testing (that will be attempted to be manipulated in every possible way) on pediatric patients.
Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1480 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:42 pm to
Posted by Tasseo
Member since Feb 2024
3252 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Puberty blockers were already experimented in children and now they’re being prescribed off label.

I am saying that’s very concerning to me because I doubt there have been adequate studies to know the long term effects.

What medications destroys a childs natural physical growth? Children's futures shouldn't be up for nonreversible experimentation.

Worse part about evil cowards like is that you wouldn't sacrifice your own children "for the cause"
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128723 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:47 pm to
Nailed it.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128723 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:48 pm to
This is your in-thread reminder that young males who take puberty blockers will almost certainly never have an orgasm.

You read that right.
Posted by shamrock
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
4137 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:50 pm to
Good grief.. yeah, here’s my kid, please put him in the study that’s says these meds will harm him/her b/c I know my child will prove that the study results thus far are wrong
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90391 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:00 pm to
I figured your goofy arse would come a running into this thread.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79393 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

What medications destroys a childs natural physical growth? Children's futures shouldn't be up for nonreversible experimentation.


I agree with you. we shouldn’t permanently alter children.

There drugs were approved for young girls who start their periods extremely young and they are generally only on them until they’re a little older. The whole point of them was to delay for a bit. not hold puberty off completely.

Now they’re being used for much longer periods of time, and I don’t know if there are any studies on if this is in fact not permanent or what the effects of long term use is. Thats very concerning to me.

Not that we need to do the studies but that we haven’t already done them and they’re prescribing this stuff to kids.

And it’s being billed as “reversible” or “temporary” without any long term data to support that.

quote:

Worse part about evil cowards like is that you wouldn't sacrifice your own children "for the cause"


This is how this interaction is going.

I say i’m concerned about the safety of these drugs because there haven’t been studies on long term effects.

you scream at me for being evil because I want kids to take these drugs.

Do you understand how new medicines get approved? Do you think children should have any medicine?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63255 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:25 pm to
Trust the science! Well... the "science" we'll let you see.
Posted by shamrock
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
4137 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:30 pm to
Do you understand how studies are done and when they expand the number of participants or shut them down? Why are you so biased to find the positive outcomes on a puberty blocker for young people?
Posted by Tasseo
Member since Feb 2024
3252 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Do you understand how new medicines get approved? Do you think children should have any medicine?

This has nothing to do with anything. As this isn't medication. We shouldn't be sexually destroying children. Point.Blank.

A moral civilization does not do this nor does it try to experiment to "figire it out".
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79393 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Why are you so biased to find the positive outcomes on a puberty blocker for young people?


I am not

I literally have said I am concerned about hot they’re being prescribed without any thought to the long term effects which are unknown
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 9:40 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79393 posts
Posted on 10/24/24 at 2:09 am to
quote:

Good grief.. yeah, here’s my kid, please put him in the study that’s says these meds will harm him/her b/c I know my child will prove that the study results thus far are wrong


1. These meds are already being prescribed, I am just saying someone needs to check back in. I think it’s being falsely labeled as reversible and the public isn’t being made aware of any issue kids have if they choose to go off these meds after years.

2. No one is making anyone sign up for these studies

3. Again, do yall know how any medicine for kids gets made? I wouldn't sign my kid up for any of them but we do have clinical trials with kids.

Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2960 posts
Posted on 10/24/24 at 5:30 am to
I think the doctor is well within her rights to not release the study results.

As long as she immediately pays back every penny of the millions of tax $$ that she took to do the study.

And she has to pay interest, the same penalties and fees the IRS would charge me or you.

That study was funded by the taxpayer, it belongs to the taxpayer, it’s public property. Release it, or pay back the money. Easy choice.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram