Started By
Message

re: Great message on abortion

Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:43 am to
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:43 am to
quote:

My 8 month old has neither reason nor reflection. Is she not a person?


Your 8 month old absolutely has reason or reflection. It may be extremely limited, but there would be a huge issue if it was void of these things.
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:50 am to
quote:

NC_Tigah


I love these double posts lol.


All you did was try to turn this into a pedantic arguement because you realized your perspective was weak and you didn't have much left. Obviously I was not using the medical term, but you know that

Me referring to the medical community was not related to that at all, but was related to the three instances already provided, explained by doctors, who dismissed your insane arguement that there is no reason to ever abort for the mother's well being.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138470 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:51 am to
quote:

If a fetus doesn't have a "self", there is nothing to "murder"
When you're on the OR table under anesthesia, complete unaware, unconscious do you have self? How about in an induced coma? How about GCS 6 post-concussive trauma?

Posted by White Bear
probably
Member since Jul 2014
17567 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Trying to perpetuate suffering in people just because they want to have sex
A little responsibility on this side would help solve the abortion issue. But I know most have zero discipline and do not take responsibility for shite.
This post was edited on 9/29/23 at 6:54 am
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Everybody knows that it’s always been a fiction to consider a fetus a not a person.


Go ahead, define a person.

quote:

Life begins at conception.


Plenty of things are alive and not a person.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138470 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:55 am to
quote:

your insane arguement that there is no reason to ever abort for the mother's well being.
Quote my ""arguement"" verbatim, dummy.

Post it here.

Then perhaps you'll learn something.
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:56 am to
Already answered this. Read bruh.

quote:

John Locke already answered that. The coma, alzheimer's, drunk whatever may not be the same self anymore (or may not have a self anymore in case of the neverending coma) but since there was a self to begin with, they should reasonably be protected (or protected against in the case of the drunk) by law. The same cannot be said of a fetus.


I appreciate that you recognized thar you weren't gonna come out of your pedantic angle on top so you're struggling to go on offense on another matter while completely ignoring my question :lol. Bad look tbh.
Posted by White Bear
probably
Member since Jul 2014
17567 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:57 am to
I find intriguing the fact many pro lifers would not hesitate to support funding a proxy war to kill Russians or support going to some 3rd world shite hole to stack bad guys like cord wood, for good reason of course.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138470 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:02 am to
quote:

John Locke already answered that. The coma, alzheimer's, drunk whatever may not be the same self anymore
quote:

The same cannot be said of a fetus.
No it can't. Because in the former statement whereas "self" is gone, it may never return. In the latter, "self" will grow and blossom over a lifetime.

So, as you correctly put it, the same cannot be said of a fetus.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89464 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:08 am to
That’s it?

No wonder he’s losing. He didn’t say anything other than the democrats want up to birth abortions.

Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:11 am to
Hence why I used the phrase "potential" earlier. disclaimer: this was not used in the medical sense of the word ;)

I've already dismissed your point.

quote:

Future/potential viability has nothing to do with a fetus not being a person before 30 weeks.
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7180 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:19 am to
quote:

Why is it so hard to find a nominee against murder, homosexuality, ideologies based on “gender fluidity”, racism, and crime? I’ve found one and he wasn’t even allowed on the stage. This country has turned into a punchline. The further we move away from God’s Word, we will experience more stress and repercussions.


Probably bc of the whole separation of church and state thing the country was founded on
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4282 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:25 am to
Wait. You believe that our nation was founded on the concept of separation of church and state?
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7180 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Wait. You believe that our nation was founded on the concept of separation of church and state?



lmfao yes as part of the first amendment from Thomas Jefferson, a founding father
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13140 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Ronbots arent serious about winning elections


No?

I believe DeSantis won his last election. I believe Trump lost his last election.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13140 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Probably bc of the whole separation of church and state thing the country was founded on


So instead the state endorses a secular religion with values pretty much identical to Satanism.
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4282 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:42 am to
The Establishment clause in the 1st only prohibits the government from establishing a state sanctioned religion. It does not impede the practice or acknowledgment or expressing of opinions on religions in the public sector. It only prohibits the passing of laws that would establish a national religion. It was of utmost importance for the people who had previously lived under the enjoining of church and state in England.
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4282 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:49 am to
Oh Lordy son! Just some friendly advice. When jumping into a conversation, be sure you have some knowledge about what you are discussing. Jefferson didn’t craft the Constitution. He wasn’t even at the Constitutional Convention. Madison, with the input of several committee members crafted the Constitution. Geesh man!
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4282 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:51 am to
LOL! You got me. I re-read your post where you cited Jefferson. I should have detected the feigned ignorance. You might be the new el gaucho!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138470 posts
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Hence why I used the phrase "potential" earlier. disclaimer: this was not used in the medical sense of the word ;)
So the termination of a post-traumatic GCS6 patient should be legal regardless of potential recovery. That is an interesting position.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram