Started By
Message

re: Graham is looking for 4 Senators to vote with him to keep Biden from testifying

Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:53 pm to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30113 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:53 pm to
Re: Graham's stated interests and intentions to open a Biden probe in his own committee, Biden testifying in the impeachment trial *could* potentially harm any efforts in Graham's committee. How that would work is Dems would vehemently argue that the Biden accusations were debunked during the trial and that this chapter should be closed. And they'll do their typical good to great job at muddying the waters with that argument. Which leads to extra scrutiny of a subsequent Graham opening of a new Biden investigation. So in these ways, Graham would have a better palette to work with in such a separate investigation.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

How fricking stupid are some people?


It's the Q thread man, it's done a number on a number of people
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123929 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

but yes you're correct it needs to end. As it is... witnesses would postpone SOTU and could bring the trial to what Burr originally predicted 6-8 weeks.
6-8 weeks of treading water at minimum. Meanwhile Trump would be maligned daily for merely asserting Executive Privilege.

If I am reading the tea leaves accurately, Trump's defense team will all but seal the thing in the next couple of days. Graham's gambit should give GOP mugwumps enough cover to send the House managers packing.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30113 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:41 pm to
So how does this even look in practice? Graham says he needs 4. That makes 5 people which of course on its own doesn't get anything done in this matter. So I guess he's referring to voting alongside Democrats to decline to subpoena Biden? Because as I understand it, only 4 crossover Republicans are needed to give the Dems a simple majority.

In any event, I suppose Graham is helping to open the door for a more acceptable crossover of Repubs only for this specific purpose. But again, in practice it would seem Graham only needs 3, if indeed he's signaling that he himself would vote no to a Biden subpoena....resulting in the 4 necessary.
Posted by lsursb
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
11590 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:27 pm to
This is the same Lindsey Graham who flew to NJ to be a character witness for Menendez during his corruption trial despite the rampant rumors of his involvement with teenage girls. That’s when I knew the swamp was for real. They act like they fight each other in front of the cameras but they protect each other from outsiders.
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 8:28 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123929 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Graham says he needs 4. That makes 5 people which of course on its own doesn't get anything done in this matter
Sounds like his headcount is 47 solid, with 6 possibilities. He needs 4 of those 6.

Schiff did himself no favors today when intimating Trump told GOP Senators he'd have their heads on a pike if they crossed him.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30113 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 11:08 pm to
Ten fo

Yeah Schiff managed to offend the Republicans on quite a few occasions, that being one that sticks out as well as insinuating that they are oblivious to what's going on around them and simply defer to Fox News for all their information and worldview.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146831 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 11:49 pm to
Even if both Biden's and the WB testified (and didn't cop the fifth) none of them will go to jail as they can't prosecute.

So Graham is correct but don't expect Graham to get a Special council or haul them in.

Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30113 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 12:03 am to
Why wouldn't they be prosecutable?
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Graham is looking for 4 Senators to vote with him to keep Biden from testifying

quote:

hes neck deep in this shite too, no doubt


Yep. He sure starts acting strange anytime they bring up investigating the Bidens.

I don't care. Let them all burn.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146831 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 1:30 am to
Because Graham is not going to call on a special council; or make any criminal referrals to be stonewalled for Ukraine slush funds mostly all of them benefit from.

They are mad Trump gave the money to military aid and not the fake NGO CGI slush foundation there.

BTW: Will anyone ever check out Obama's foundation? Probably not just like Clinton's.

Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30113 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 1:50 am to
I see what you're saying, but let's say both Bidens testified, surprisingly didn't invoke the 5th, and surprisingly provided some compelling evidence of some sort of conspiracy that potentially violates U.S. law. Regardless of what Graham decided to do, couldn't the Justice Department upstart an investigation based on that testimonial evidence?
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24752 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 5:27 am to
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram