Started By
Message
locked post

Goverment wants a Nationwide Facial Recognition System for US Citizens & the AI arms race

Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:07 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:07 am
Under the guise of "airport" security

quote:

In a filing, the department has proposed that all travelers, and not just foreign nationals or visitors, will have to complete a facial recognition check before they are allowed to enter the U.S., but also to leave the country.

Facial recognition for departing flights has increased in recent years as part of Homeland Security’s efforts to catch visitors and travelers who overstay their visas. The department, whose responsibility is to protect the border and control immigration, has a deadline of 2021 to roll out facial recognition scanners to the largest 20 airports in the United States, despite facing a rash of technical challenges.

LINK

We really need to wake up.

1. Assisted AI is here already
2. Quantum supremacy has already been achieved by google (meaning they have a computer strong enough to decrypt the highest military encryption in hours. In a year, some are saying they will have it down to less than a second). Every qbit added is exponential power.
3. As this processing and storage power begins to increase exponentially over the next few years, things like facial, voice, gait, and heartbeat recognition will ensure you are tracked everywhere against your will.

The next step is tracking and recording thoughts which is already starting in overseas.

BELOW IS AN ACTUAL IMAGE OF A THOUGHT READ AND RENDERED BY A COMPUTER.

LINK



quote:

Pearson, a futurologist and ex-cybernetics engineer, told us: "I would think in a lab we're probably a decade or 15 years away from that (technology).

"I don't think it will be very long after that before police are using it in interrogations, getting somebody in for questioning.

"Instead of a police officer asking questions, they'll stick a helmet on to decide what it is that's going through your mind.



Consider this - if 15 year old social media posts can destroy a career, what will it be like when any memory can be extracted and viewed in our minds 20 years from now?

Combine this with deep fake technology and we'll live in a world with no freedom and no way of believing anything.

The final step is Artificial General Intelligence which should be within 8 years. At that point, the connections the AI will be able to make connections with other areas and grow to Artificial Super Intelligence exponentially. Now I am not talking about self aware AI, I'm talking about tech that is controlled by humans. Whoever controls this tech first controls the world.

We are in a tech arms race right now for the fate of freedom itself and no one seems to be talking about it.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 7:10 am
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:10 am to
One world government will be here soon. We need to keep Trump in office as long as we can, he's our only hope

Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:11 am to
quote:

One world government will be here soon. We need to keep Trump in office as long as we can, he's our only hope


The cats out of the bag on tech. This is really a national security issue and needs to be addressed now.
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4217 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:14 am to
About 10 years ago I was reading the Unabomber's manifesto out of curiosity. Halfway through I quit reading after becoming scared that I was finding myself in agreement with a known madman. He was wrong in his violence but 100% correct about tech.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:22 am to
Right. And the old adage "just unplug it if it gets out of hand" no longer works with worldwide distributed systems. Even if a global EMP went off, the tech could survive due to where and how some of our best servers are stored.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:27 am to
Unplugging it just takes a different form now.

Instead of physically pulling a plug, one would slowly release a virus that wouldn’t show itself until it had total control of what it wanted. Like the recent ransomware attacks on LA state government.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:29 am to
True but I don't think an engineered virus could topple AGI. In fact, AGI would just re-code it and redirect it instantly.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36023 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:31 am to
Ted Kaczynski was spot on. A monster, but spot on.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:33 am to
...can convert and become Amish? Because that's starting to sound like a good idea.
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 7:33 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:33 am to
What did he say?
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24849 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:34 am to
I am just glad my dogs aren’t going to be alive to live through it.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:36 am to
quote:

can someone become Amish? Because that's starting to sound like a good idea.


That's the question - in 10 years - how do you opt out of a system where you can't drive, can't purchase, cant even walk into town on your own two feet to pick up lumber without AI or being tracked? Think about it - even if you are off the grid, if you come remotely close to anyone who's opted in or any tech your vitals/signatures are registered.

People keep asking about these crazy UFO sightings all over the world and why we have secret shuttles and satellites being launched...I think those are simply higher tech tracking mechanisms way above. How do you escape that?
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 7:38 am
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36023 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:39 am to
He describes the psychology of the modern left and discusses the negative social consequences of an industrial-technological society. I would describe him as an autonomist who believed technology would eviscerate human relationships, privacy and creativity.

Unabomber Manifesto
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:39 am to
Afraid to click that lol.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11096 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:42 am to
If y'all are interested in this 5G stuff go look up what it's like to live in Beijing. We won't be able to drive our cars or order an Uber if we've done something wrong deemed by the government. It's creepy but welcome to the surveillance state.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:48 am to
quote:

if y'all are interested in this 5G stuff go look up what it's like to live in Beijing. We won't be able to drive our cars or order an Uber if we've done something wrong deemed by the government. It's creepy but welcome to the surveillance state.


"Someone" is already testing and laying the ground work for that tech here in the US

My Life - Reputation Scores and Reports for US citizens

If you haven't opted out - you are in there

That site reminds me of DARPA's initial start of "LifeLog" that ended the same day FaceBook started. And while I am on that our own intelligence community gave seed money to Google when it was first starting. Things that make you go "hmmmmmm"
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 7:48 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:48 am to
Our wonderfully patriotic intel and federal enforcement complex will never ever misuse that.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:49 am to
quote:

About 10 years ago I was reading the Unabomber's manifesto out of curiosity. Halfway through I quit reading after becoming scared that I was finding myself in agreement with a known madman. He was wrong in his violence but 100% correct about tech.


I'd never read the thing until I saw this thread. There's some downright prophetic things in that. Yikes.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57306 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:50 am to
Posts some cliffs so I don't end up on another list
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36023 posts
Posted on 12/4/19 at 7:53 am to
quote:

We attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that that society requires people to live under conditions radically different from those under which the human race evolved and to behave in ways that conflict with the patterns of behavior that the human race developed while living under the earlier conditions. It is clear from what we have already written that we consider lack of opportunity to properly experience the power process as the most important of the abnormal conditions to which modern society subjects people. But it is not the only one. Before dealing with disruption of the power process as a source of social problems we will discuss some of the other sources.

Among the abnormal conditions present in modern industrial society are excessive density of population, isolation of man from nature, excessive rapidity of social change and the breakdown of natural small-scale communities such as the extended family, the village or the tribe.

It is well known that crowding increases stress and aggression. The degree of crowding that exists today and the isolation of man from nature are consequences of technological progress. All pre-industrial societies were predominantly rural. The Industrial Revolution vastly increased the size of cities and the proportion of the population that lives in them, and modern agricultural technology has made it possible for the Earth to support a far denser population than it ever did before. (Also, technology exacerbates the effects of crowding because it puts increased disruptive powers in people’s hands. For example, a variety of noise- making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles, etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use the devices are frustrated by the regulations. But if these machines had never been invented there would have been no conflict and no frustration generated by them.)

For primitive societies the natural world (which usually changes only slowly) provided a stable framework and therefore a sense of security. In the modern world it is human society that dominates nature rather than the other way around, and modern society changes very rapidly owing to technological change. Thus there is no stable framework.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram