- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GEOTUS has the same approval rating as Obozo with 93% negative coverage
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:16 am to MastrShake
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:16 am to MastrShake
quote:
. That 93 percent thing was one group looking at the first 100 days only, and 'negative" can mean whatever they want it to. So not only is it horribly outdated, it was entirely subjective even back then.
If you cannot see with your own eyes the difference between Obama and Trump’s coverage you’re a lost cause.
1
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:21 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
I suspect his true, actual approval number is >60%.
Don't care about polls. You baws better be voting on election day.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:22 am to Deuces
quote:
If you cannot see with your own eyes the difference between Obama and Trump’s coverage you’re a lost cause.
thats wholly irrelevant. OP said trump "has the same approval rating as Obama with 93% negative coverage". both assertions are lies. boohoo if that hurts your feelings.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:23 am to MastrShake
quote:
always entertaining to see the "facts not feelings" crowd INSTANTLY bail on that whenever it suits them.
Nobody brought up feels. They brought up fact.
Go right now to any msm website or channel and look at the Trump articles.
Fact.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:25 am to texridder
quote:
The Rupert Murdoch- owned Wall Street Journal's coverage of Trump is 70% negative.
Maybe the problem is not the coverage but the one being covered.
Liberals live in a altered reality.
Hell even the CIA investogators were bias and are under investigation.
Is that feels or fact?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:31 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:33 am to i am dan
quote:literally the exact opposite of a fact, and sure as hell no where near establishing a 93 percent rate.
Nobody brought up feels. They brought up fact.
Go right now to any msm website or channel and look at the Trump articles.
Fact.
ftr, heres this; i typed in nothing but "trump" and got a CNN story that seems to imply trump is justified for being angry at Mueller, a Fox story about wiretaps, and one about global "tensions". below that are 3 of his tweets. thats 5 positive and 1 neutral.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:39 am to jessieventura9
quote:
re-elect Trunp. or vote for a Socialist.
Yep those are our only two options. No other parties in the country exist.
It's rather amazing trump supporters can answer a poll at all with 93% of them can't count passed two.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 8:24 am to mindbreaker
quote:
It's rather amazing trump supporters can answer a poll at all with 93% of them can't count passed two.
When you attack someone's intelligence, you should make sure to use the correct spelling of "past".
So ironic.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 8:32 am
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:02 am to TaderSalad
quote:
Tadersalad
Is that you Ron white?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:22 am to MastrShake
quote:
i typed in nothing but "trump" and got a CNN story that seems to imply trump is justified for being angry at Mueller,
Did you read that article? It throws innuendo after innuendo out there against Trump.
I just looked at all the other articles and popup videos of Trump bashing.
Not gonna argue with you over this.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:10 am to MastrShake
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:11 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
Your IQ is so low.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:41 am to F73ME
quote:I mean this sincerely; when it comes to a political argument. all things considerd, that is one of the most pathetic things I've ever seen.
Obviously there's no media bias
What makes random tweets from people ive never heard of, "the media"?
How is it "bias" if the headline from a conservative editorial says almost the opposite than the headline from a liberal editorial? Isn't that what you want?
I'm not saying bias doesnt exist, were not AI, it's very hard to avoid, but this insane conspiracy nonsense is unhealthy, it's not good for you or anyone around you. Grow up.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:44 am to MastrShake
It's more like 97% negative coverage and his approval rating is in the low 70s
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:53 am to TigerAxeOK
Just this past weekend I had a mom of three in the store tap me on the shoulder and pretty much whisper to me that her and her family like my hat.
(MAGA HAT)
Pretty much made it seem like she had to say it quietly so no one else would hear.
(MAGA HAT)
Pretty much made it seem like she had to say it quietly so no one else would hear.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:05 am to CptBengal
quote:
Is this the reason for increasing censorship online? To take back control of the narrative they've lost?
We all know what their reason is and we also know their tactics are straight out of a fascist's handbook. Oh the irony
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:08 am to SDVTiger
quote:it's sad to see what's become of the party of William F Buckley, it really is. You're so proud of being dumb and uninformed, it's like a badge of honor now to have no idea what's going on. anything you don't like or understand is instantly dismissed as take news, is truly bizarre.
It's more like 97% negative coverage and his approval rating is in the low 70s
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:11 am to MastrShake
quote:
being dumb
quote:
take news
Indeed
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:14 am to MastrShake
quote:
it's sad to see what's become of the party
Yep, your Party has gone full blown Socialist!
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News