- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fmr CIA Ops Officer: Slotkin Knew She Was Putting Together A Propaganda Video
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, its not going to happen, unless the orders are illegal.
If you listen to the media, Trump issues illegal orders. Even the PSA implied the same.
1
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:10 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Democrats know how easily it is to distract MAGA with worthless drama, and it works like a charm.
Which is why they used a former, "specially trained" CIA agent to convey the messaging.
Gotcha.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:11 am to SallysHuman
quote:
If you listen to the media, Trump issues illegal orders. Even the PSA implied the same.
Youre saying Soldiers are retarded and will throw away their life over cheap propaganda.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:12 am to Timeoday
quote:
Which is why they used a former, "specially trained" CIA agent to convey the messaging.
Its cheap propaganda. The only people falling for it is MAGA.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:12 am to SallysHuman
quote:Credit where it is due.
Here's the timeline of this argument... 2384 was proffered by someone else. I initially argued for 2385, but I was wrong. I then suggested 2387, to which you agree there's some "there" there.
I know there are several different arguments going on in these threads... but if you look at mine specifically- I never defended 2384. I DID briefly suggest a different, wrong one... then found a more fitting one.
You are a master at refusing to answer questions or take positions that mean making even the tiniest concession to rationality.
One last try, REGARDLESS of what you have argued about other statutes in this thread or elsewhere.
Do you, NOW, believe that the Tweet violated section 2384? Yes or no.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:13 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre saying Soldiers are retarded and will throw away their life over cheap propaganda.
The PSA was former military and intelligence inviting them to do so- even telling them that those in the PSA would "have their back".
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:14 am to SallysHuman
quote:
The PSA was former military and intelligence inviting them to do so- even telling them that those in the PSA would "have their back".
Its cheap propaganda, and it worked like a charm, on you people.
No one else cares. In a day or two, no one will remember it.
This post was edited on 11/23/25 at 10:15 am
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:16 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Do you, NOW, believe that the Tweet violated section 2384? Yes or no.
You're being an arse.
Here, I don't think 2384 applies to the PSA but 2387 does.
Which has been my position, aside from a misstep in advocating 2385.
Why you post,
quote:to me I don't fuggin understand at all.
You are a master at refusing to answer questions or take positions that mean making even the tiniest concession to rationality. One last try, REGARDLESS of what you have argued about other statutes in this thread or elsewhere.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:17 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
God, I wish you people would learn to use that term correctly. No one is trying to make you believe that you are insane.
Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse where one person manipulates another into questioning their own sanity, memories, or perception of reality. This can involve distorting facts, denying events, or presenting false information, leading the victim to feel confused and anxious about their own experiences. It is often characterized by a systematic effort to undermine the victim's confidence in their own thoughts and feelings.
Your narrow definition is bullshite.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:17 am to Timeoday
Most of the feral bureaucracy that is not cut needs to be distributed all across the states. The way it is, the DC swamp is a hothouse for bad demprog ideas.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:18 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its cheap propaganda, and it worked like a charm, on you people.
Do you think it is fitting for former service and intelligence members that now serve as congress critters to engage in "cheap propaganda" directed at current service and intelligence members?
I don't.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:18 am to SallysHuman
quote:
They might if they're being bombarded by media and congress critters that everything Trump does is illegal and then that they should disobey illegal orders.
That’s presupposing that these people are unable to think for themselves.
They’re not going to blindly obey an obviously unlawful order. They’re trained as a unit, but are professionals.
As for the more, shall we say, legally ambiguous orders? Those are way, way, WAY rarer than certain people would have you believe.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:21 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Do you think it is fitting for former service and intelligence members that now serve as congress critters to engage in "cheap propaganda" directed at current service and intelligence members?
Sure. The message didnt say what you have been told it said.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:21 am to Godfather1
quote:
That’s presupposing that these people are unable to think for themselves.
It was an inappropriate PSA targeted directly at military and intelligence. It should never have been made.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:23 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Sure. The message didnt say what you have been told it said.
You're the one who called it cheap propaganda... and I know what the message said.
But, to be clear, you think it's fine and dandy to have people in positions of respect, service and authority to create and direct "cheap propaganda" at service members?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:23 am to SallysHuman
quote:
It was an inappropriate PSA targeted directly at military and intelligence. It should never have been made.
It was actually a PSA using our military as a political football.
I can virtually guarantee way more members of the military were offended by this than not.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:24 am to Godfather1
quote:
I can virtually guarantee way more members of the military were offended by this than not.
I can believe that.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:25 am to SallysHuman
quote:
You're the one who called it cheap propaganda... and I know what the message said.
Very cheap, and it worked like a charm because MAGA is so gullible.
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:28 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Very cheap, and it worked like a charm because MAGA is so gullible.
the height of idiocy
That is seriously too stupid for me to deconstruct.
"She did exactly what you said, but you complained about it so 'you fell for it'.?
Posted on 11/23/25 at 10:29 am to Jbird
quote:
Number of Posts: 1030
Registered on: 10/24/2025
Hank is back. Just read the posts.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News