- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fed. Appeals Court Upholds Travel Ban Block
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:54 pm to FalseProphet
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:54 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
That argument goes that by banning Muslims, the President is establishing a national religious preference in the United States.
That's a non-sequitur.
1
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:56 pm to AUstar
It's convinced a lot of Judges so far. I don't think it's a bad argument at all, I just don't think it carries the day.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 1:56 pm to NC_Tigah
LMAO.
So much winning by Trump.
So much winning by Trump.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:02 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Democrats have moved from believing slavery is good to believing that putting Japanese Americans in internment camps is good to not allowing Muslims from some countries into our country is bad.
And they call Trump a flopper
And they call Trump a flopper
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:02 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
If they hold that, I guarantee you it won't be a true per curiam. It will be a bullshite per curiam where the majority doesn't want to take ownership of it accompanied by dissenting opinions.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:03 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
So much winning by Trump.
In the grand scheme, this is actually a huge win for Trump. The 4th Circuit, on its own, reinterpreted the meaning of Supreme Court precedent, radically extended establishment clause jurisprudence, and held, for the first time, that a candidates statements can be considered in post-election conduct. That last holding alone has far-reaching implications, because it presupposes that once elected, an official is forever tainted by pre-election statements and can't be cured.
Trump couldn't have hoped for a better case to invite Supreme Court review. He got exactly what he wanted.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:06 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Hopefully no American dies because of their incompetence.
I remember before Trump, people were dying right and left
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:08 pm to NC_Tigah
Tone for some judges to swing from the end of a rope
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:10 pm to udtiger
Killing government officials they know nothing about is apparently the Trumpkin solution for most things
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:12 pm to Pettifogger
Just taking a page out of the DNC book
snaps fingers
snaps fingers
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:12 pm to NC_Tigah
Two appellate circuits deciding the same way, the 4th and the 9th. The Supremes will likely deny a cert petition and let the (so far) unanimous judgment of the courts of appeal stand.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:13 pm to Pettifogger
I held this belief since Trump's first marriage, but you just keep being stupid.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:13 pm to Tiguar
quote:
Just taking a page out of the DNC book
I didn't say killing low level staffers leaking to WikiLeaks
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:14 pm to udtiger
quote:
I held this belief since Trump's first marriage, but you just keep being stupid.
Yes, it's me who is being stupid
Not the guy arguing for execution of judges he doesn't know anything about
Posted on 5/25/17 at 2:15 pm to TBoy
quote:
Two appellate circuits deciding the same way, the 4th and the 9th. The Supremes will likely deny a cert petition and let the (so far) unanimous judgment of the courts of appeal stand.
Sigh. A Circuit split isn't the only way to get to the Supreme Court. Don't you think there was a reason these cases were brought in the 4th and 9th an no other circuit?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 3:12 pm to Pettifogger
LOL
Posted on 5/25/17 at 3:20 pm to FalseProphet
No. A split is not required.
Certiorari is completely discretionary.
Certiorari is completely discretionary.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 3:24 pm to TBoy
quote:
Two appellate circuits deciding the same way, the 4th and the 9th. The Supremes will likely deny a cert petition and let the (so far) unanimous judgment of the courts of appeal stand.
I don't think there is any way the Court denies this case.
Posted on 5/25/17 at 3:27 pm to udtiger
You think I don't know that?
Posted on 5/25/17 at 4:22 pm to FalseProphet
Just checking in to say I hate Muslims.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News