- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:19 am to SDVTiger
You are so fricking stupid it hurts my head.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:but the illegals aren't. my word. so your response was stupid. illegals are not protected by nm/us law. but you knew that already right?
Setting aside the patent stupidity of the boldface language, we are discussing vigilantism. The vigilante is question was a US citizen
quote:and i have explained how your response did not show i was wrong.
And you were wrong
quote:and you know this how?
Your understanding of basic legal principles is approximately equal to a schnauzer’s understanding of calculus
quote:so a us citizen is allowed to protect their property from intruders. that's all you had to say
In varying degrees in different situations in MOST states, the answer is “yes” by statute
quote:if they are on their property, they are according to you
But they are NOT allowed to go out and search
quote:they are allowed to detain on their own property, according to you
take a purported thief into custody
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:20 am to 9th life
Happy Easter to you as well my low life retard e buddy 
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:20 am to SDVTiger
quote:I cite you to a 2013 statute, and your response is to cite a NEWSPAPER article from 2011, saying that there was no such statue in 2011 ... two years before the statute was amended.
All you do is lie Hero Hank
OK.
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 9:49 am
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I cite you to a 2013 statute, and your response is to cite a NEWSPAPER article from 2011, saying that there was no such statues in 2011 ... two years before the statute was amended.
All you do is lie liberal Hank
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
near-consensus of hate for the FBI and love for vigilantism?
Mobs illegally crossing an international border en masse is vigilantism, how rich
You mean the FBI that’s under criminal investigation for fomenting a coup? Illegally spying on an opposition campaign and treason? That effbeeeye?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:34 am to SDVTiger
quote:Your NEWSPAPER article says that New Mexico (back in 2011) had “continued to recognize the Common Law concept” of citizen’s arrest. That SAME article explains that, under the Common Law, a “citizen’s arrest” was limited (in relevant part) to FELONIES. This is consistent with the above-cited statutory law, which is basically a codification of this Common Law concept.
All you do is lie liberal Hank
AGAIN, “unlawful entry” is NOT a felony.
Yet another swing and miss for STD.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:37 am to AggieHank86
It’s an invasion by a hostile militia, we should shoot on sight
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:37 am to bfniii
quote:A JD with honors from a top-10 law school and 30 years in practice, as compared to your apparent GED.quote:and you know this how?
Your understanding of basic legal principles is approximately equal to a schnauzer’s understanding of calculus
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Your NEWSPAPER article
That wasnt from a NEWSPAPER article
And I never linked the source
All you do is lie Hero Liberal Hank
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:39 am to bfniii
quote:Not remotely what I said. The law varies greatly from state to state.quote:so a us citizen is allowed to protect their property from intruders. that's all you had to say
In varying degrees in different situations in MOST states, the answer is “yes” by statute
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:44 am to SDVTiger
quote:I am quite aware that you did not provide a link to the article. That failure does not change the fact that it was a direct quote from a 2011 article in the Albuquerque Journal, written by Alan Malott.
That wasnt from a NEWSPAPER article
And I never linked the source All you do is lie Hero Liberal Hank
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
A JD with honors from a top-10 law school and 30 years in practice
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:48 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I am quite aware that you did not provide a link to the article. That failure does not change the fact that it was a direct quote from a 2011 article in the Albuquerque Journal, written by Alan Malott.
All you do is lie holy frick
Heres where I got the info from https://solutions-institute.org/tools/citizens-arrest-laws-by-state/
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:55 am to SDVTiger
quote:This link does not include any of the language that you quoted earlier, all of which appears in the ABQ Journal article. Your link DOES, however, contain a link to the NM statute that I cited above.
Heres where I got the info
I have endured my daily quota of your stupidity.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 9:58 am to BamaAtl
quote:
they are themselves terrorists, however.
You are truly the worst.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:00 am to AggieHank86
quote:
This link does not include any of the language that you quoted earlier
I have endured my daily quota of your stupidity
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:00 am to xiv
quote:
unamerican
No, you're describing the people that are illegally sneaking into our country to steal from hard working taxpayers.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 10:01 am to Strannix
This is pretty simple.
There is no way the govt is going to allow organized armed groups, not affiliated with some level of govt to act unmolested. No govt does.
The guy is a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. Anyone past grade school knows you get arrested for that. Wrapping yourself in the flag and pointing out someone else breaking the law doesn’t get you off the hook.
There is no way the govt is going to allow organized armed groups, not affiliated with some level of govt to act unmolested. No govt does.
The guy is a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. Anyone past grade school knows you get arrested for that. Wrapping yourself in the flag and pointing out someone else breaking the law doesn’t get you off the hook.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News