- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
EVERY conservative worried about spending bill should watch this
Posted on 2/16/19 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 2/16/19 at 2:31 pm
Essentially this guy explains that because this is a 7 month spending bill, the poison pills put in this(consulting local mayors, can’t huild in certain areas, and can’t arrest someone who w kid), aren’t changing laws and regulations about how DHS does business, rather it’s just handcuffs on this particular $ in this bill. And that Trumps admin doesn’t care because they can use other $ to do the things they want and work around it until October.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 2/16/19 at 3:00 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
work around it until October.
When things will be drastically different.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 3:03 pm to Lsujacket66
Or....
Don't sign it and build the wall now.
Don't sign it and build the wall now.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:22 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Or.... Don't sign it and build the wall now.
They are
Posted on 2/16/19 at 4:25 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
When things will be drastically different.
Yes, but not in the way you think.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 5:33 pm to Lsujacket66
Thank you so much for sharing this it was very informative.
I asked when he signed the bill whether the 224/local government provisions were permanent amendment to substantive law. My main beef with it was that I believed that it was. Now I know, thanks to this guy who explained it perfectly that all those tricky provisions only apply to the money appropriated in this specific bill -but the USC (where the immigration substantive law is) is not changed.
It is now clear to me that Trump had no alternative but to sign that shite sandwich. I feel so much better, and I’m glad I kept my sparkle coat and the faith.
Sentrius was with me on my complete meltdown yesterday. I hope he watches this.
POTUS. I should never have doubted you. #MAGA Y’all.
I asked when he signed the bill whether the 224/local government provisions were permanent amendment to substantive law. My main beef with it was that I believed that it was. Now I know, thanks to this guy who explained it perfectly that all those tricky provisions only apply to the money appropriated in this specific bill -but the USC (where the immigration substantive law is) is not changed.
It is now clear to me that Trump had no alternative but to sign that shite sandwich. I feel so much better, and I’m glad I kept my sparkle coat and the faith.
Sentrius was with me on my complete meltdown yesterday. I hope he watches this.
POTUS. I should never have doubted you. #MAGA Y’all.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 5:46 pm to KCT
quote:
Yes, but not in the way you think.
#TrustSessions
Posted on 2/16/19 at 5:59 pm to Lsujacket66
I’m still pissed about 1,700 pages.
Posted on 2/16/19 at 8:39 pm to TerryDawg03
Need to go back to 12 individual appropriations
Posted on 2/16/19 at 8:42 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
he poison pills put in this(consulting local mayors, can’t huild in certain areas, and can’t arrest someone who w kid), aren’t changing laws and regulations about how DHS does business, rather it’s just handcuffs on this particular $ in this bill.
And DHS has already said that they aren't considered "poison pills" for the bill money because of how DHS defines certain words. They said that the language in the bill is extremely narrow and will have minimal to no impact.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News