- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Epstein Files: Massie reveals names
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:14 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:14 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
His point was that if all the details were to come out about Epstein and Israel it could cause problems for the past and present members of some in the Trump administration, as well as for senior officials in prior Democratic administrations.
Works for me. Out them asap!
1
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:19 am to dgnx6
quote:
He has only released these names now after losing his election. And doing with the protection of the house floor. Some of you guys hate Jews so much you made this grifter your hero.
Trump's DOJ has the unredacted files, how about they release them? Why are they protecting these people?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:22 am to idlewatcher
Yet none of them still never mention Bill Clinton or discuss him being investigated. Guy did a creepy arse deposition and it was in the news for all of about 30 seconds. Bill Clinton should be the very first person investigated and everyone knows it. No one is going to take them seriously until they parade the Clintons into court and before the media first.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:29 am to SDVTiger
He's trying to conflate agreement with the President's assessment that the US collectively has bigger fish to fry than the direct Epstein matter right now with the belief that nothing happened on LSJI and/or there's no there there.
That couldn't be further from the truth.
I am more confident than ever that the entire Epstein saga will be brought to light and that all of the associated miscreants at all levels of celebrity/politics/business will be appropriately identified and prosecuted.
What I have not done is I haven't become retardedly myopic about JE/Maxwell/Wexner/et al. and developed a Pavlovian response to every 47 Admin post/tweet/truth of "bUt wHaT aBoUt ePsTeIn???!" Not everyone can say that.
In the modern era of The Sacred Church of Veruca Salt, there is no room for patience or allowing the 47 team to tackle the issues at hand in the order they feel they must for maximum effect/results, especially when that order of operations doesn't match the arbitrary timeline of the random internet posters. Instead, the only appropriate reaction is to throw a thermonuclear shite fit that it hasn't transpired in the way that the tantrum's host would like it to go down.
That couldn't be further from the truth.
I am more confident than ever that the entire Epstein saga will be brought to light and that all of the associated miscreants at all levels of celebrity/politics/business will be appropriately identified and prosecuted.
What I have not done is I haven't become retardedly myopic about JE/Maxwell/Wexner/et al. and developed a Pavlovian response to every 47 Admin post/tweet/truth of "bUt wHaT aBoUt ePsTeIn???!" Not everyone can say that.
In the modern era of The Sacred Church of Veruca Salt, there is no room for patience or allowing the 47 team to tackle the issues at hand in the order they feel they must for maximum effect/results, especially when that order of operations doesn't match the arbitrary timeline of the random internet posters. Instead, the only appropriate reaction is to throw a thermonuclear shite fit that it hasn't transpired in the way that the tantrum's host would like it to go down.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:29 am to MikkUGA
Massie never named Reid Hoffman, either. This should lead reasonable people to suspect that Hoffman has bought Massie's selective silence.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:30 am to RemyLeBeau
They can't release them unredacted per court order. Don't know how many people actually read the files or looked into what was going on with Epstein but many of the people Massie named were already investigated and the sol had already run out. So the victims sued them and the companies they worked for. They settled out of court for millions and the victims had to sign ndas to never discuss it again or they would have to forfeit the money. That is why the victims won't say the names and that is the reason for a lot of the redactions. So no matter what Trump is legally binded to keeping those redactions.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:34 am to MikkUGA
quote:
it was in the news for all of about 30 seconds. Bill Clinton should be the very first person investigated and everyone knows it. No one is going to take them seriously until they parade the Clintons into court and before the media first.
Congress doesn't have the power to prosecute. Is Trump's DOJ protecting Clinton?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:35 am to IvoryBillMatt
Verified clients of underage girls?
Really?
Really?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 11:39 am to VoxDawg
quote:
He's trying to conflate agreement with the President's assessment that the US collectively has bigger fish to fry than the direct Epstein matter right now with the belief that nothing happened on LSJI and/or there's no there there.
Unless you're Donald Trump, you're wrong here.
quote:
What I have not done is I haven't become retardedly myopic about JE/Maxwell/Wexner/et al. and developed a Pavlovian response to every 47 Admin post/tweet/truth of "bUt wHaT aBoUt ePsTeIn???!" Not everyone can say that.
No. You dropped promoting the CT entirely once Trump called it a hoax.
This used to be your baby. I can post the receipts. When did you start your last Epstein-related thread?
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News