re: Emails Show Epstein's Assistant Bought $8,453 Unlabeled Item from Wayfair

quote:

---

Again, any time you post in one of these threads trying to discredit shite, you have the opposite effect.

---

Not to rational people, as this thread should have shown you.

quote:

---

Like I said in the other thread, dot-connecting randomness

Just wait until they try to pound the chest and say that another conspiracy theory has been proven true when they've shown nothing

---

And just like that, SFP comes to the defense of satanic pedophiles.

quote:

---

Wayfair wasn't running an e-commerce business for missing children, where they provided order numbers, a bill of sale, tracking, and the kids name.

You're still insane.

---

I noticed in the image with all the kid pics and names that at least a couple of them had been found. That absolutely suggests this Wayfair accusation isn't as straight-forward as, "Amy (or whoever) is missing = Amy is for sale on Wayfair". I would imagine it's very rare that a kid in the clutches of a well-organized crime group would escape. So, in a way, I agree: Wayfair (itself) wasn't running an e-commerce biz for missing children.

That being said, most of your sarcasm / derision in this thread fails to comprehend what may be going on. I don't know your posting well enough to know your intentions, but the following is is worth explaining...

Google: "can marketplace sites be used to launder money via third party sellers?"

AI Summary:

quote:

---

Yes, marketplace sites can be used to launder money via third-party sellers, and this is a known and growing problem exploited by sophisticated criminals. The speed, volume of transactions, and cross-border nature of e-commerce make it an attractive target for illicit financial activity.

Common Money Laundering Techniques
* Fictitious or Phantom Transactions
* Mispricing Schemes: Illicit funds are disguised through transactions involving significantly overpriced or undervalued goods between colluding buyer and seller accounts. The inflated value of the item helps move larger sums of money covertly.
...etc.

---

I'll include a small blurb from a couple of security publications for a little more context instead of only relying on the ai summary:

quote:

---

Price and quantity manipulation: Launderers list common items at extreme prices, split transactions to stay below thresholds or engineer rapid partial refunds to move value while dodging flags.

---

Brilliance Security Magazine

quote:

---

Mispricing Schemes: Criminals engage in fraudulent transactions involving significantly overpriced or deliberately undervalued goods. These schemes enable discreet transfer of illegal funds disguised as legitimate transactions. A common practice involves items listed at inexplicably high prices, purchased by accomplices to funnel money covertly.

---

FinCrime Intelligence

quote:

---

Creating e-commerce businesses as a front for illicit transactions (for example, to accept bank card payments for drugs).

---

RUSI.org

In short, $10k pillows or $12k cabinets that look like they're worth a few hundred at most are a red flag for a mispricing scheme hiding fraudulent activity or money laundering. This is unambiguous.

The use of missing kid names is less clear. It is weird. But it could be some criminal org having a sick sense of humor, or something else like using public databases of missing kids as some form of coding between buyers and sellers (like boy names = cocaine; girl names = meth or marijuana). To be clear, I would need to see more information before I would be comfortable making any connection between the missing kids and the possibly fraudulent listing. The kid names on the large poster looking image list missing dates that span from at least 1993 to 2020... and it would seem unlikely a kid who went missing in 1993 ended up for sale sometimes in the 2010s. Then again, identical 5 shelf cabinets with separate listings that cite names like Anabel and Samiyah are suspicious.

It's also important to realize that Wayfair is a marketplace site that represents 3rd party sellers. So, again, Wayfair itself would almost certainly never be shipping children. But they don't have absolute control over bad actors who may have created a fake shop on their site. This is why your sarcasm fails.

In short, it's possible that whoever started the idea of Wayfair being used by pedos was lying and fabricated these ads. I never saw them myself. But it is apparently true that criminals do use this this mispricing technique, so your mere disbelief is insufficient to dismiss the premise. If the ads were real, it just becomes an issue of whether a $10k Duplessis pillow gets you a 5 lb bag of weed in a pillow covering, or if it is something else... like a down payment system (for boomers who don't use crypto) for entre into groups that may be guilty of something along the lines of what is suggested. It would clean the money and would open a line of communication between the 3rd party seller (criminal group) and their customers for further vetting (to weed out the few normies who might get this far... perhaps returning their money due to the "mistaken" ad) and to facilitate further arrangements for those deemed qualified.