- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:16 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
it was reported that local CVille Veterans and the historical society were protesting the removal of the statue. why is it that people think only the fringe were there? and you are correct the MSM has YET to call out ANTIFA for whom and what they really are. MILO will tell you all about them from Berkley.
My question is were these people marching on Friday night? I can't find any news stories on this, which granted as you said could be because of the biased MSM. The point Trump made was very specific to the night before. I will grant you that it is possible before the Alt-Right protesters showed up that there could have been decent people protesting the statue on that location and time; however I think they should have instantly dispersed and denounced the people with torches and refused to stand alongside them and certainly not march with them.
Could you provide a link because I'm coming up empty handed in my search?
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:18 pm to ihometiger
All GOP senators will lose their seats.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:18 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If they were marching with the guys holding the torches, yes. They're either that or extremely stupid. What if someone takes a photograph and it gets back to your parents, friends, or employers (which I'm sure has happened to multiple people there)? You would have to be a retard to do it.
I'm not going to read this entire thread to see how you got your last few posts...am I confused? I thought the Nazis were on the UofV campus with their marching and others were at a park where the statue was located?
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:23 pm to larry289
quote:
I'm not going to read this entire thread to see how you got your last few posts...am I confused? I thought the Nazis were on the UofV campus with their marching and others were at a park where the statue was located?
If they were already at the statue protesting, then I think morally acceptable people can have that stance. I also think they should have dispersed the second the Nazis showed up to show they didn't want to be associated with them.
But if they're marching alongside them, then yes they are shitty people. Mine and almost everyone else's impression was Trump was defending the people who marched to the statue.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:31 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
The removel of a POTUS who is mentally unfit to POTUS would not be done by impeachment.
It would be done through the use of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.
LINK
Theoretically. But in this case, not in real life. No way that Trump's cabinet would ever go there. But 51% of the HoR just might.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:33 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
But if they're marching alongside them, then yes they are shitty people. Mine and almost everyone else's impression was Trump was defending the people who marched to the statue.
OK, but you didn't answer my question. You immediately said that if what I said were true, then they should have dispersed when the Nazis showed up.
Sounds just like a MSM commentary. You are assuming the "good people" protestors would not have done that when you don't even know if the Nazis went to the park in the base case.
Sort that out for me because I honestly don't know the answer to my original question to you and it appears you do not either.
Now the following day from what I see on television it looked like a pod of humanity that all looked like undesirables.
PS: I despise anyone who would even consider siding with a Nazi, but still not convinced that "fine people" protesting the removal of Lee statue were "marching along side Nazis".
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:35 pm to MrLarson
quote:
You have no clue if there were legit people there to protest the removal of that statue but you will totally sell out for that 22 minute video that vice put together. You are pathetic and an emotional child that cannot rationally discuss that there are other possibilities than the narrative that the media is driving.
So you're telling us that you're such an effing POS that if you showed up at a protest and a bunch of Nazis did also, you'd hang out with them and march right along beside them.
You have to be one fricking dumbass to think that any "legit" person would walk side by side with self proclaimed Nazis at a protest. Oh, we all know what you mean when you use the word "legit".
Posted on 8/17/17 at 8:52 pm to ihometiger
Newsweek is pretend.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:00 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
Look at this clown lol
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:19 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
Look at this clown lol
I guess you're the type of clown that loves to scream "Blood and Soil", or at least think its acceptable to hang around them, a-hole.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:23 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
So you're telling us that you're such an effing POS that if you showed up at a protest and a bunch of Nazis did also, you'd hang out with them and march right along beside them.
You have to be one fricking dumbass to think that any "legit" person would walk side by side with self proclaimed Nazis at a protest. Oh, we all know what you mean when you use the word "legit".
Being at the park now equals marching with nazis? So, you too are now saying that any anti nazi protester was ANTIFA?
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:23 pm to larry289
quote:
OK, but you didn't answer my question. You immediately said that if what I said were true, then they should have dispersed when the Nazis showed up.
Sounds just like a MSM commentary. You are assuming the "good people" protestors would not have done that when you don't even know if the Nazis went to the park in the base case.
Then find me those people. Show directly with evidence that I am wrong. Show me where people were at that statue protesting before the Nazis showed up and then disbanded. I will say those are quality people and don't deserve to be lumped in with Neo-Nazis.
All I've seen are Neo-Nazis and about 4 dozen people protesting them that night. Sure the shite from the other side that is repulsive showed up the next day, but find me a quality person protesting the statue removal that was there in person that night. Trump was talking shite and he should denounce the Alt-Right as a whole.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:24 pm to ihometiger
Impeachment begins in the House. God you liberals are frickING dumb. The House has to bring charges, The Senate must convict.
Bill Clinton was impeached by the House - yes, yes he was. The Senate wanted no part of it.
Aside for the absence of impeachable offense, what else can you guys charge? Extreme Butthurt? Will the House risk their seats on Butthurt? I doubt it.
Bill Clinton was impeached by the House - yes, yes he was. The Senate wanted no part of it.
Aside for the absence of impeachable offense, what else can you guys charge? Extreme Butthurt? Will the House risk their seats on Butthurt? I doubt it.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:27 pm to TopJimmy
This board makes me realize why left ole miss after one semester. Those frickers are bent.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:30 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Then find me those people. Show directly with evidence that I am wrong.
The burden of proof is always on the accuser. Nice try kiddo.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:34 pm to Janky
quote:
This board makes me realize why left ole miss after one semester. Those frickers are bent.
This board gives me hope. Other than a few Millenial retards it seems to be populated with people of common sense. Go read other boards, it's a depressing venture. I go to other boards to raise my blood pressure, I come here to calm down.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:37 pm to MrLarson
quote:
The burden of proof is always on the accuser. Nice try kiddo.
The accuser? I've got this fricking image:
It's up to you to prove to me that all the people gathered here aren't Nazi assholes. The burden of proof is on you, not me. Yours is the hypothetical, mine is what is directly seen. I've also got this video: LINK
So disprove this. You can disprove Vice not showing Antifa violence pretty easily because there are many clips available of them assaulting people first. But please find the good people you assure me were there protesting the removal of the statues. Sorry, but burden of proof is 100% on you. I haven't found one good statue protester at the scene yet, and I have the proof of hundreds of Nazis and white supremacists there.
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The accuser? I've got this fricking image:
Show us, on a doll, where the historical statue touched you. It doesn't matter though as you are a cringe-worthy enema nozzle.
Posted on 8/17/17 at 9:46 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
You can disprove Vice not showing Antifa violence pretty easily because there are many clips available of them assaulting people first.
This one statement should make you take a step back from the ledge and realize that if they won't show ANTIFA then they sure as hell won't show and protesters that wern't Nazis. If you can't admit that then there is no reason to continue this conversation.
And you thinking that the burden of proof is on me is laughable. That isn't how things work.
If that is the case I could accuse you of all sorts of things and then you have to defend them for them to not be true. That isn't how anything in life works.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News