0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ sues to block Alaska US Senate results if Republican incumbent loses
Posted on 10/23/26 at 6:06 pm to dcbl
Posted on 10/23/26 at 6:06 pm to dcbl
quote:
Here’s the thing, I know you’re not as stupid as you pretend to be
Upon what do you base your disqualification?
Note: this has already been litigated to the Alaska Supreme Court
Posted on 10/23/26 at 6:07 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
So - do you really think this fake Sullivan is a real candidate?
You support a direct action by the democrat party to dilute the voting base?
not worth having this debate -
Its not about supporting it.
They totally got this guy to run because of the name similarities
That doesnt deny the fact that hes a valid candidate under Alaska State law as proven by the highest court in the Alaska judicial system
People in Alaska want to change state law for the next go round? Sure. However idk how you would rewrite state law to prevent two people with the same first and last name running
The voter ballot clearly has the real Sullivan listed as incumbent.
This is a reeeeeeallllly stupid hill to die on you guys :lol:
Posted on 10/23/26 at 6:07 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's a valid lawsuit.
Please explain how.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 6:08 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
So - do you really think this fake Sullivan is a real candidate?
Upon what would you base his disqualification?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 7:10 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
Pretty sure this is a follow up suit to the earlier suit where the court said something to the effect that there was no cause at that time because there was no damage because the election had not occured yet.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 10:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Weak deflection as you know that is not the issue at hand. The issue at hand has not been decided as you suggested. IE you didn't answer squat
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News