1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ sues to block Alaska US Senate results if Republican incumbent loses
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
Judge the voters all you want Pontius but no voters should be confused by ballots. Sorry you're pro confusion in elections because you pre judge people you've never met. Your a great American citizen.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:23 pm to i am dan
quote:
you guys were told biden was competent and you believed them.
wut
quote:
I'd say you guys a pretty big idiots.
I'm the opposite of an idiot, and you're clearly confused as to who I am, based on your above comments
quote:
you guys will cheat in any way possible for votes.
This lawsuit is the attempt to cheat.
The candidate has been ruled as properly on the ballot by the Alaska Supreme Court. His candidacy is not in question.
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:24 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Judge the voters all you want Pontius but no voters should be confused by ballots. Sorry you're pro confusion in elections because you pre judge people you've never met. Your a great American citizen.
I mean think about this.
How are you going to write a law to prevent this situation from happening again? People with the same name can't run in the same election?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:25 pm to gaetti15
We're about to get a lot of "It's not who you vote for. It's who you INTEND to vote for" which will be a big hit with Saints fans in particular
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm the opposite of an idiot, and you're clearly confused as to who I am, based on your above comments
You're ignorant.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:26 pm to i am dan
quote:
You're ignorant.
Oh jeez, are we starting the "lawfare" discussion this early?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:26 pm to i am dan
quote:
You're ignorant.
is it wrong I read this in the Michael Jackson parody voice from South park?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:26 pm to gaetti15
quote:
I mean think about this.
How are you going to write a law to prevent this situation from happening again? People with the same name can't run in the same election?
Why have a democrat listed on the ticket that got 2.5% of the primary vote?
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:27 pm to gaetti15
quote:
is it wrong I read this in the Michael Jackson parody voice from South park?
good episode. 
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:29 pm to gaetti15
Wow
I thought you wouldn't give up so easily.
So you think it impossible so don't even try.
I don't consider my self smart but damn slo lol
We drive cars. We drive them on roads and do the impossible. We drive them in opposite directions on the same damn road. How do you think thats possible?
I thought you wouldn't give up so easily.
So you think it impossible so don't even try.
I don't consider my self smart but damn slo lol
We drive cars. We drive them on roads and do the impossible. We drive them in opposite directions on the same damn road. How do you think thats possible?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This lawsuit is the attempt to cheat.
I'll remember this post and use it.
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:29 pm to i am dan
quote:
you don't believe this other Dan Sullivan joined the race to confuse voters?
He finished in 3rd place with 2.5% of votes. You think he should be on the ticket?
Sounds like an attempt to confuse voters to me. That's exactly how you people operate. Cheat any way you can.
It's Alaska. They have ranked choice voting. As long as any candidate stays in the race, they're on the ballot.
And if Alaska uses the system where a voter has to vote for every candidate, and rank which priority they place each candidate.... This makes a bad system even more of a mess.
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:31 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
You were the second person to post in the other thread. Why start this one?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
First reply too.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:35 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Wow
I thought you wouldn't give up so easily.
So you think it impossible so don't even try.
I mean all im asking is how the hell is someone or a legislative body going to write a law that prevents this situation from happening?
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:37 pm to i am dan
quote:
Why have a democrat listed on the ticket that got 2.5% of the primary vote?
I mean we all know this is a parlor trick by the Democratic party.
But hes an actual candidate on the ballot and no law exists to prevent that else he wouldnt be on the ballot.
My question is...how in the shite could anybody write a law to prevent this?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:41 pm to gaetti15
quote:
I mean we all know this is a parlor trick by the Democratic party.
But hes an actual candidate on the ballot and no law exists to prevent that else he wouldnt be on the ballot.
My question is...how in the shite could anybody write a law to prevent this?
I don't know. I don't guess you can. But maybe a ticket should only have primary party winners listed, and all others can be written in.
Rs should just do the same thing in every state. Just find some school teacher with the same name to run. That's what Alaska is doing. I betcha it would bring a lawsuit from a democrat judge, which would be quite ironic.
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:42 pm to gaetti15
You don't need an 11th commandment.
Instead of laughing calling people stupid and giving up you just need to print ballots that makes it extremely clear and makes you stop and think for 10 seconds and clearly marks when candidates have similar names. There are experts who make emergency markers plain to read road signs. Visual cues to help people. Colors. Borders. Freekin arrows. It's doable. No law just common fricking sense to help voters in confusing bill terminology and similar names. JFC
Instead of laughing calling people stupid and giving up you just need to print ballots that makes it extremely clear and makes you stop and think for 10 seconds and clearly marks when candidates have similar names. There are experts who make emergency markers plain to read road signs. Visual cues to help people. Colors. Borders. Freekin arrows. It's doable. No law just common fricking sense to help voters in confusing bill terminology and similar names. JFC
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:44 pm to goatmilker
quote:
just need to print ballots that makes it extremely clear
Idk what about the current ballot doesn't look abundantly clear
ETA: like is it hard to see the word or read the word "incumbent"
This post was edited on 10/23/26 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 10/23/26 at 1:47 pm to gaetti15
quote:
My question is...how in the shite could anybody write a law to prevent this?
It's mostly up to the state election officials, which have the say in how the names appear on the ballot.
But. If said officials told a candidate they ruled had to be changed, it would also mean the candidate's application has to be changed. If the officials don't give the candidate enough time before the deadline, there's a lot of problems.
In this particular instance, I am afraid I don't know what happened tho.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News