- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone think US troops will eventually be on the ground and engaged in Ukraine?
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:47 pm to LsuNav
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:47 pm to LsuNav
quote:
Our support of this war is reckless. NATO invaded Serbia (wrongly) and the Russians thought supportive did not provide the kind of support that we are doing in Ukraine because they saw the danger that our politicians refuse to see. What happens if the Russians blow up a train full of US Military Assistance personne
all I'm saying is that if i'm an archduke somewhere, i'm not riding in any open topped vehicles.
0
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:47 pm to Chromdome35
You’re a fool if you don’t think contingency plans aren’t already in place to ensure a select few are poised to assume control in the fallout of a nuclear war.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:48 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
So nothing changes the calculus of the battlefield. Nothing in your graphic represents any real combat power.
i didnt put any analytical comments. i just posted the numbers.
but i disagree that nothing changes the calculus of the battlefield.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:50 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
There won't be any power or authority to consolidate.
The world would be united in factions within a few years. If you don't think some humans have planned for this kind of event...
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:50 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
But assume control of what? The whole “system” that secured their wealth (and thus influence) would be in tatters, so their prior position in the world’s power structure would take the same hit.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:50 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
Control of what exactly? We all know the US government has continuity plans in case of nuclear war, but what are they going to govern and how?
There won't be TV, Electricity, logistics networks, etc...
ETA: The party politics of today will be the last thing anyone will care about. CRT, Wokeism, LGQTQSDLFJK+ won't matter at all to anyone.
There won't be TV, Electricity, logistics networks, etc...
ETA: The party politics of today will be the last thing anyone will care about. CRT, Wokeism, LGQTQSDLFJK+ won't matter at all to anyone.
This post was edited on 1/26/23 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:52 pm to davyjones
quote:
But assume control of what? The whole “system” that secured their wealth (and thus influence) would be in tatters,
They would confiscate resources quickly. Resources would be wealth in the new world.
Water, oil, precious metals....
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:53 pm to Northshore Aggie
What of those items would change the situation for Russia?
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
what are they going secure those resources with and to what end? There won't be any oil refineries to process the oil, there won't be any way to get the oil out of the ground, and there won't be any way to transport it to the refinery.
Advanced resources needed by modern society will be unneeded by a post-nuclear war society.
Advanced resources needed by modern society will be unneeded by a post-nuclear war society.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 1:58 pm to Chromdome35
Once thar oil stops flowing in Siberia that permafrost fricks shite up. It will shite down those fields for years
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:00 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
what are they going secure those resources with and to what end?
And I say before you even get to those questions, who’s to say that the eventual victorious “side” of such a war are not at all friendly towards these particular people? They’d be snuffed out and that’s the end of them and their auspicious plans.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:00 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Wouldn't a nuclear war destroy any chance of them realizing the goal you stated, so why would they want it?
How so? I'm not sure I understand your gist....
An approx 80% reduction (500 million left as the Elites' servants / slave class) is their "perfect" goal/number.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:01 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
what are they going secure those resources with and to what end?
Even after an all out nuclear exchange, there's going to be a shite load of things not destroyed, including serious weapons and systems.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:02 pm to davyjones
What it would ultimately do is force the worlds populations into small pockets of livable areas making them more easily controllable and reliant on those who wish to rule them. Eventually production etc. would return and the one world government wet dream of the WEF would be realized because the choice would be nuclear hellscape and death or servitude in “comfort” provided in the remaining urban centers by your overlords who control everything.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:02 pm to Liberator
quote:
"Anyone" like "normal people"? Yes. But the psychopaths of the One Whirled Goobermint crave a nuke exchange and death-exchange. (Remember -- these are the same psychopaths and Luciferians whose giddy goal is a world populated by just 500,000,000 and planet "cleansed" of Useless eaters.") The consensus: Boots ALREADY there. The Empire's criminal snout is poking where they shouldn't. Hot "exercises" are about to get hotter (which is exactly THE MO.) This entire insane, illegal Op (lacks the consent of We The People just like the "RESET) has been ALL ABOUT baiting and backing The Russian Bear into a corner so that they must finally retaliate to survive. WW3-type blowback & aftermath helps accomplish more de-pop dirty work and RESET for the Elites.
Many of you don’t truly read or realize what you’re saying before you click submit. How would any of what you said work? The elites are pushing for the reset, and the way to do that is by starting a nuclear war that’ll end life on earth? Doesn’t make much sense.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:05 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I’m more concerned about unintended US casualties that leads to an escalation
Well then Russia needs to GTFO Ukraine. We saw a little bit of this already in Poland and that’s really where things would escalate. Good things cooler heads prevailed when a missile struck that farm in Poland. More proof that the West isn’t trying to escalate things. If we were, then we would have used that as an excuse to go to war.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:05 pm to davyjones
quote:
if we all get ourselves into WWIII, which simply must be assumed would devolve into nuclear exchange, then any “reset” like that would probably be a moot objective because there likely wouldn’t be much remaining to be worth resetting...The world’s most powerful villains don’t want to see their “kingdoms” to be in such a tenuous position....
Debatable. Why?
Not nearly all weaponry is conventional. The new nigh tech weaponry is designed to destroy and kill -- and still leave buildings and infrastructure undamaged. High-tech / EMF / EMP -based weaponry is a beautiful thing for them.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:07 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
To me the moral of the story is that they’d probably be better off just sitting tight on what they got and exert all their power and influence towards avoiding the WWIII scenario altogether. Too many unknown variables, too much trouble. And the bastards seem to have it plenty good as it stands now. Maybe they’re going all in with this strategy, but IMO they’d be very stupid to upset their own apple cart. Just too damn unpredictable.
In my opinion the most powerful and influential people on all sides are probably lobbying against any serious escalations.
In my opinion the most powerful and influential people on all sides are probably lobbying against any serious escalations.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:08 pm to LsuNav
quote:
There is no way the Ukrainians will be able to operate all the complicated equipment they are set to receive.
Absolutely the case (which is why *they* won't be THE operators.)
quote:
What happens if the Russians blow up a train full of US Military Assistance personnel?
CNN and MSNBC and FNC will all report it of course!...
(OH WAIT)
Posted on 1/26/23 at 2:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I highly recommend some of you read the book "One Second After" which does a good job of realistically describing the after-effects of an EMP strike on America.
Any nuclear exchange would include EMP impacts. However, even a limited nuclear exchange would be much worse than an EMP attack.
Things might survive the attack, but it won't matter one bit to the overall collapse of the country.
Any nuclear exchange would include EMP impacts. However, even a limited nuclear exchange would be much worse than an EMP attack.
Things might survive the attack, but it won't matter one bit to the overall collapse of the country.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News