- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone think there is a chance that Hillary is indicted with Uranium 1
Posted on 11/12/17 at 10:30 pm to shoelessjoe
Posted on 11/12/17 at 10:30 pm to shoelessjoe
Sadly, no.
1
Posted on 11/12/17 at 10:51 pm to AustinTigr
quote:
DJT - Will be the least corrupt and 'owned' President in American history.
What do you think about the $300 million contract awarded to Whitefish Energy to rebuild the energy grid in Puerto Rico?
Whitefish is a nothing 2 man holding company located in Secretary of the Interior Zinke's home town in Montana. Whitefish's primary investor, HBC Investments, was founded by Joe Colonnetta, a prominent campaign donor to Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 11:00 pm to shoelessjoe
Even if she's indicted, nothing will happen to her.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 11:25 pm to upgrayedd
So what y’all are saying is that the Saudi princes that were arrested and had ties to her, will not yield anything close to her or the people she associated with? In return no one will fess up to what she has done even if it means keeping their hide out of jail? I find it to coincidental that Donna Brazile is jumping ship at the same time. Too much smoke to say it’s a definite no. I understand that she wasn’t the only one in uranium one but they all should rot in hell. Everyone involved is dirty. If it was no big deal, why was it kept hush hush for so long.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 11:30 pm to shoelessjoe
No. It’s already coming out how the judges hearing the case have long been associated with Fusion GPS and the Podesta clan. Anyone who thinks justice will be done this way is fooling themselves.
Posted on 11/12/17 at 11:32 pm to shoelessjoe
quote:
I find it to coincidental that Donna Brazile is jumping ship at the same time.
I think Donna was trying to time her book release with the 1 year anniversary of the election, nothing more.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 6:40 am to shoelessjoe
No, the Clintons are so politically connected someone on the lower level will take the fall before they will.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 6:43 am to shoelessjoe
Like James Comey, Robert Mueller, as a prewritten statement exonerating Clinton of all intent to commit a crime.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 9:02 am to shoelessjoe
No
Posted on 11/13/17 at 9:57 am to GeorgeWest
quote:
Not a chance. 9 agencies approved that sale unanimously. It wasn't a HRC decision.
Not saying I think she will, but are all 9 agencies accused of taking money from parties involved in the sale? And was her agency's approval a requirement in the sale?
Posted on 11/13/17 at 10:03 am to Lsuchs
quote:
Not saying I think she will, but are all 9 agencies accused of taking money from parties involved in the sale? And was her agency's approval a requirement in the sale?
yes 9 agencies, each with veto power over the deal, finally approved and signed by the president.
Its why these idiots on here that think the Clinton's somehow used this deal to line their pockets is so fricking stupid. Hillary was never involved at all in the deal other than to sign the state dept. docs.
yet somehow the Clintons were able to persuade 8 other department heads to approve the deal so they could make money.
Its fricking stupid.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 10:04 am to shoelessjoe
Yahoo News gave a big 'attaboy' to Shep Smith for being the only Fox commentator who thinks Uranium 1 is a big nothing.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 10:30 am to Cruiserhog
Would it still be illegal to receive money from parties involved in the sale, being the head of an agency that's approval was required? Regardless of what the decision was to end up being without payments?
I don't know much about the other 8 agencies but wasn't there an FBI investigation into Russian lobbying in the US around this time?
I dont think an investigation is unwarranted here, especially if we are gung-ho on getting to the bottom of Russian influence in the United States
I don't know much about the other 8 agencies but wasn't there an FBI investigation into Russian lobbying in the US around this time?
I dont think an investigation is unwarranted here, especially if we are gung-ho on getting to the bottom of Russian influence in the United States
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 10:32 am
Posted on 11/13/17 at 10:37 am to shoelessjoe
quote:No.
Does anyone think there is a chance that Hillary is indicted
The definitive NYT article suggests that Hillary is sleazy AF and should never hold public office, but probably stayed within the law.
quote:
Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation...
Posted on 11/13/17 at 11:50 am to austintigerdad
quote:
The definitive NYT article suggests that Hillary is sleazy AF and should never hold public office, but probably stayed within the law.
If you are referring to the 2015 NYT article, the Times wrote that article from an advanced copy of the book "Clinton Cash", which was written by Peter Schweizer, a Breitbat reporter, edited by Steve Bannon, and published by Robert Mercer.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 12:57 pm to shoelessjoe
Indicated by who? Dems, GOPe, FBI and other assorted deep staters are her buddies and/or connected enough to be implicated.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 1:35 pm to texridder
quote:Got a link to a reliable article that refutes the 2015 NYT piece? TIA.
If you are referring to the 2015 NYT article
Posted on 11/13/17 at 1:44 pm to Rockbrc
quote:
Does anyone think there is a chance that Hillary is indicted with Uranium 1
Wityh this type of stuff being the "legal system" for our betters?? No.
*Why isn't this seen as "kinda a big deal* No one seems to be pointing it out??
*Podesta and the judge to oversee the case*
LINK /
....and this;
quote:
In May, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed a lawsuit by the families of the victims of Benghazi against Hillary Clinton. Judge Jackson decided that the families couldn’t sue Hillary either for wrongful death or for defamation. That isn’t too surprising as Jackson is a former Clinton donor who had been appointed by Obama. And a Clinton donor should never have been ruling on a Clinton case. But now Judge Jackson will be presiding over the Paul Manafort case. Presiding over Manafort’s indictment is Judge Deborah A. Robinson. Judge Robinson’s most prominent previous case was the Berger trial. Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s former National Security Adviser, stole classified documents about the terror failures of the Clinton administration, hid documents under a construction trailer, lied about taking them and destroyed some of them. People have gone to jail for doing a whole lot less with classified documents. But not Clinton associates.
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 11/13/17 at 2:08 pm to shoelessjoe
not gonna happen....political class bruh...they ain't like us
Posted on 11/13/17 at 2:12 pm to texridder
quote:
Whitefish is a nothing 2 man holding company located in Secretary of the Interior Zinke's home town in Montana.
DNC talking points. If you care, research how many people Whitefish had in Puerto Rico actually doing the repairs and what percentage of the system they had up and running after the hurricane. They had people, materials, and equipment pre-deployed or on it's way before the storm hit.
Any company hired to do the work has to be from someone's district - it is not always sinister. Maybe the Interior Secretary had some influence, and maybe not. Don't tell me that it it was a Union group that there would have been nothing political about the appointment under Obama. If you want to look for criminal influence, go back to 2008 and see what happened to the green energy companies that donated to the DNC.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News