- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJT on Slotkin/Mark Kelly video - Seditious behavior from traitors. Lock them up???
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The impeachments were also nothingburgers to me b/c it was just political theater to score only symbolic victories. Trump was never being removed by the Senate, so the impeachment was worthless.
So it was no big deal. We should just forget about it.
1
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:01 am to lsusteve1
quote:
My opinion is that it’s seditious
How can following the law and Constitution ever be seditious?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:01 am to Bunk Moreland
There it is. More Revolutionary language from the Professional Left- this one aimed at creating dissension in the ranks. They are literally declaring that only THEY can govern. This is a call for one party rule. From where I sit, this is an opportunity to drum out of the ranks as many doctrinaire Leftists as possible. And use this to let normals know exactly how the Left will use the dishonest language of legal formalism to destroy the country. It’s hand in hand with stolen elections, political assassinations, attacking law enforcement, leaving the border open, crashing healthcare intentionally, indoctrination of our children- and every other use of Leftist Agitprop the Left uses to overthrow the country one cut at a time.
That is a provocation of the first order. It’s a shot across the bow WAY beyond the political norm and should be treated as the threat it is. That’s a new low. Anyone who defends it is beneath contempt and in the service of destroying our Republic.
That is a provocation of the first order. It’s a shot across the bow WAY beyond the political norm and should be treated as the threat it is. That’s a new low. Anyone who defends it is beneath contempt and in the service of destroying our Republic.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:02 am to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
So it was no big deal.
Only to emotional types, on both sides.
quote:
We should just forget about it.
How did it inhibit Trump in any way?
Not symbols or interpretation or emotion. Tactile impacts.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:02 am to Harry Boutte
quote:
Why do you (and Trump) hate the First Amendment?
Silly post.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How can following the law and Constitution ever be seditious?
There’s nothing the left does lately that follows laws or shows they support the Constitution
Nothing
It’s revolutionary speak & should be dealt with
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:03 am to SDVTiger
Every
single
time
Then gets his panties twisted when you call him a dem
single
time
Then gets his panties twisted when you call him a dem
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How did it inhibit Trump in any way?
It was just an impeachment. It didn’t inhibit anyone.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:04 am to lsusteve1
quote:
There’s nothing the left does lately that follows laws or shows they support the Constitution
So you didn't watch the video?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:05 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Then gets his panties twisted when you call him a dem
Laughing at the stupidity is not that
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:05 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Then gets his panties twisted when you call him a dem
He's 10x more conservative than you
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:06 am to Timeoday
quote:
How can following the law ever be sedition?
quote:
What are the illegal orders?
quote:
it's not really a relevant question.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:06 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Let me rehash.
All youre doing is making excuses for Trump melting down when soldiers were told to obey the law and Constitution.
You are on the wrong side of this.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:06 am to Lsupimp
Yeah, I somewhat disagree with Roger and SFP here. It's a signal to be insubordinate IMO. But, they couched in the language that "you only have to follow lawful orders" the same way the 50 former intel officers said the Hunter laptop had the "hallmarks" of Russian disinformation. That said, I think that Trump could handle it better than going full throttle and giving them what they wanted (the impression he is in insane dictator).
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:07 am to lsusteve1
quote:
My opinion is that it’s seditious
Explain to me how soldiers being told to obey the law is seditious.
Do you think they are supposed to follow illegal orders??
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:08 am to lsusteve1
quote:
And your opinion is par for the course
Because deep inside you realize Trump is dead wrong here.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well, the Democrats didn't specify so it's not really a relevant question.
So, your point is centered around illegal orders that democrats have not specified and you haven't seen for yourself.
Interesting.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
MAGA is firmly now anti constitution and anti-conservative, obviously.
what were the illegal orders? Be specific. TIA. 
I guarantee you can’t name one. What does that tell you about the Dems statement? Think real hard Roger.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
sure Jan
Posted on 11/20/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
wrong about what? What are these clearly illegal orders?
Page 3 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News