- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems plan to use the 14th amendment to disqualify Trump from taking office on Jan 6, 2025
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
Oh frick off, Jake.
Get off the fricking internet and go touch some green grass, you autistic freak. No time for your bullshite today.
Get off the fricking internet and go touch some green grass, you autistic freak. No time for your bullshite today.
1
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why did you leave out Section 5, I wonder?
Because it wasn't in the image that I cribbed from Twitter.
quote:
What "appropriate legislation" did they pass to enforce Section 3?
Even in your profound state of somewhat-functional retardation you must be able to acknowledge that the legislative provision in Section 5 could easily follow any mass casualty event that they're already preparing for. The Patriot Act was written, locked and loaded in advance of 9/11, and it was passed with a quickness when they had the precipitating event that would circumvent public scrutiny/opposition.
It is unreasonable to suspect that they would be quick to follow other legal requirements to enforce an action that would achieve their ultimate goal of preventing Donald Trump from returning to the WH. They already demonstrated they were willing to derail the constitutional challenges to the EC vote and certify questionable election results without continuing the challenges that were interrupted on Jan. 6, 2021.
This will be my only response to you today.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:30 am to Godfather1
quote:
Oh frick off, Jake.
Get off the fricking internet and go touch some green grass, you autistic freak. No time for your bullshite today.
Feelings [ x ] Hurt [_] Not hurt
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Feelings [ x ] Hurt [_] Not hurt
Yes. Clearly I hurt your feelings, jagoff. That was my intent.
Christ, you’re one internet meme/buzzword after another. This is what comes of having no life.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:32 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Even in your profound state of somewhat-functional retardation
I think its more of an anti social personality disorder.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's dead
Yes, I already said "it" won't and can't happen.
You're pretending that the larger conversation is only about "it", as if that's the only avenue they have to weaken or get rid of him.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:33 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Because it wasn't in the image that I cribbed from Twitter.
Shocker you didn't do your own research and just took the word from others.
quote:
Even in your profound state of somewhat-functional retardation you must be able to acknowledge that the legislative provision in Section 5 could easily follow any mass casualty event that they're already preparing for.
What does this have to do with removing Trump for insurrection in the past?
How could they pass a retroactive law?
Why would the USSC permit any of this?
quote:
They already demonstrated they were willing to derail the constitutional challenges to the EC vote
Unconstitutional challenges, you mean.
quote:
This will be my only response to you today.
I feel bad for you, considering how shitty this post was.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think its more of an anti social personality disorder.
Just a straight up weirdo. Was pretty clearly shoved into a few lockers in his day.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:34 am to Godfather1
quote:
Just a straight up weirdo. Was pretty clearly shoved into a few lockers in his day.
The nerds dilemma.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:35 am to Indefatigable
quote:
The fear porn fantasy that somehow Democrats would magically be able to prevent that is laughable.
That position presumes the Dems are sufficiently powerful to prevent Trump's return to the WH. I reject that premise because I don't believe it to be the case.
That's not to say that they won't ATTEMPT to prevent Trump's second term. This is an existential fight for them, as there is more than ample evidence to prosecute, jail (and maybe punish more severely) practically every prominent Democrat in positions of power in Congress and most swing state officer roles.
If properly prosecuted, the D Party may be wholly radioactive.
This post was edited on 10/31/24 at 8:36 am
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:35 am to Flats
quote:
You're pretending that the larger conversation is only about "it", as if that's the only avenue they have to weaken or get rid of him.
Now you're expanding the conversation.
I'm talking specifically about removal of Trump for insurrection based on the 14th Amendment. Only that (what's put in OP).
You're now trying to expand this into a discussion about other avenues to weaken or "get rid of him".
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It seems someone is trying to provoke civil war, and it's the people who keep posting the same clips.
Which side burned cities and killed people the last two elections? Which side used the federal government to attack everyone from regular citizens to party opponents? Which side is running on a platform of fundamental change to the country? Which side is running on a platform of silencing opposition? Which side has repeatedly threatened to use the US military against citizens it doesn’t agree with?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:36 am to Godfather1
quote:
Christ, you’re one internet meme/buzzword after another.
I asked a simple question that you're still refusing to answer and are flinging random ad homs instead to avoid answering.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:37 am to VoxDawg
quote:
That position presumes the Dems are sufficiently powerful to prevent Trump's return to the WH. I reject that premise because I don't believe it to be the case.
They most likely will not pull it off, but they will try. They've been trying since before the 2016 election.
The issue is that the widespread sentiment is there, they havent stopped trying to destroy one man since 2016.
They arent going to stop now either.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:37 am to Godfather1
quote:
Was pretty clearly shoved into a few lockers in his day.
No.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:37 am to Nguyener
quote:
Which side burned cities and killed people the last two elections? Which side used the federal government to attack everyone from regular citizens to party opponents? Which side is running on a platform of fundamental change to the country? Which side is running on a platform of silencing opposition? Which side has repeatedly threatened to use the US military against citizens it doesn’t agree with?
What does any of this have to do with what you quoted?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I asked a simple question that you're still refusing to answer and are flinging random ad homs instead to avoid answering.
I answered: I told you to frick off.
As with any discussion with you, this is just playing chess with a pigeon. So go ahead and knock over all the pieces, shite all over the board and strut around declaring your big internet victory, you sad, pitiful incel. It’s what you do.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
What does that question have to do with my assertion? Dont change the subject
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No.
Yes.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 8:40 am to Godfather1
quote:
As with any discussion with you, this is just playing chess with a pigeon. So go ahead and knock over all the pieces, shite all over the board and strut around declaring your big internet victory, you sad, pitiful incel. It’s what you do.
More ad homs.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News