Started By
Message

re: Dan Rather Speaks Out

Posted on 5/17/14 at 7:22 am to
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9790 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 7:22 am to
quote:

So what do you say to the sheople that willing allow themselves to be controlled by the media?


I ask, "How could have voted for Obama twice?"
Posted by redandright
Member since Jun 2011
9790 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 7:24 am to
quote:

You talking about the guy who ran with knowingly falsified documents to try to start a war?



Prove it.
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 8:01 am to
I'd Rather he didn't as one of the media that was spewing lies of his own sort to meet his needs for whatever cause.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
87820 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

This Titan of journalism has sent down the word from Mount Pious that a dominant media that advocates for one side of the political spectrum might be harmful?


Yes.

Well, I mean, except for the times HE used to do it himself, of course. Then it was just hunky dory.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135794 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

This board is full of people taking news stories seriously, as if they're legitimate.
From CBS news? Really?
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

The media is liberal because concentration of power makes them more powerful. If power was decentralized nobody would pay network newsreaders millions of dollars because nobody would have to worry about how Washington DC is going to frick them over today. Concentrate power, make the mouthpieces powerful, really easy concept.



If the DOJ would wield the Sherman Anti-Trust act on the media, it would be a start on fixing some of the problems with the media. However, we all know that won't happen with the steaming pile of shite that is head of the DOJ right now.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38819 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:41 am to
So, Dan gets 'religion' ...gets back up on his soapbox and tries to convince us ignert dupes that he didn't WORSHIP the same damn machine that he now calls the whole dominant MSM (read Fox) out for. It was fine when he (his Progressive Ideology) held the power...but now...it's corrupt. Dude has some nerve; but then again, his ego and the public perception that he worships is high on his list and I'd expect nothing less.

More Leftist blather from Rather. Half truths...as usual. "Candid"...my arse.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:45 am to
quote:


This board is full of people taking news stories seriously, as if they're legitimate.
From CBS news? Really?



From any news.

So many of you are so paralyzed by political branding you're incapable of absorbing things their true state.

Not sure what some of you don't get about just 4 conglomerates owning everything that is on tv, radio, and print.

You're not going to hear about the criminal monetary system.

You're not going to hear about the integrated relationship between different industries.

You're not going to hear about how things like military contracts are awarded.

Ect

The news is made extremely lively within a limited spectrum to make you think it's important.

The way this thread has gone is a great indication of how programmed people have become, everyone is crying about liberal bias when there is clearly something much larger to cry about.
Posted by Hooligan's Ghost
Member since Jul 2013
5673 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:54 am to
different industries have integrated relationships!

Oh my God!!!!
Posted by Hooligan's Ghost
Member since Jul 2013
5673 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 9:56 am to
and I forgot about the Ect, I can't cope with the Ect
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116814 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I don't know if Dan Rather is out of touch with reality


It's not that complicated. He's a liar. Like when he said on TV that he was a Marine. He wasn't. And as long as you're gonna lie about being a Marine why not just go ahead and say you were Lt. Colonel?
Posted by Jay Quest
Once removed from Massachusetts
Member since Nov 2009
10690 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 11:16 am to

quote:

If you want to keep your job, if you want to stay in good standing you stay away from certain areas.

Like lying Dan?

Rather was the polar opposite of what he claims to be ideal.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:21 pm to
quote:



Rather was the polar opposite of what he claims to be ideal.



He's basically telling you how the industry is, and who runs it.

The guy was far from perfect.

What he said is very true, and very evident in this thread, people literally can not even begin to grasp the powerful effect of just 4 conglomerates owning all forms of media.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 6:22 pm
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18333 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

just 4 conglomerates owning all forms of me


Link?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:


Link?



Yeah, in the OP.

Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18333 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:42 pm to
So his opinion is your basis, got it! No facts or statistics, his opinion.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

You talking about the guy who ran with knowingly falsified documents to try to start a war





Really? Are you that fricking stupid?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 6:58 pm to
I would say who cares about any of that stuff.

Is what he's saying in this interview true or untrue? (Which really isn't a question, what he said is verifiable).

And since it is true, what does that mean? If news is controlled (which is a very different issue than being biased) to keep paradigm shifting information withheld, then our reality is not genuine.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

So his opinion is your basis, got it! No facts or statistics, his opinion.


I think a quick google search will confirm for you that just a handful of corporations own the vast majority of all forms of media.

Believe it or not this is common knowledge for a lot of people.

Also, I think a guy who has worked his entire life in the media industry is speaking with more than just opinion when he says that 6 and no more than 4 conglomerates own most all media.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 7:32 pm to
This cannot be said often enough-

frick Dan Rather. After bullying people for years, he turned out to be as crooked as anyone he ever interviewed.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram