Started By
Message

re: Court upholds Florida law requiring felons to pay fines, fees before they can vote

Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90799 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:48 pm to
Negative.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

What if they are unable to pay?


Tough shite.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39874 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Good point. You know the answer.
No, I don't. If a prison term is fulfilled, then they should be just like anyone else. Shouldn't lose voting rights just because fines/fees are unpaid.

To be clear - I'm not talking about, e.g., literal restitution for a victim.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90799 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:53 pm to
If they were part of the felony conviction pay up if you want to vote. Simple fix.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

If they were part of the felony conviction pay up if you want to vote. Simple fix.



Truth
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39874 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

If they were part of the felony conviction pay up if you want to vote. Simple fix.
That's fine. I was thinking of things like unpaid traffic tickets from before you went in and the like.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90799 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:00 pm to
Copy.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

What else would you call it? A million potential voters.. Florida GOP was desperate to keep them away from the polls so they created a new law to stop these people from voting.

creating a new law or further clarifying a law already on the books? If you haven't paid all fines and costs, then you haven't completed all the terms of your sentence pursuant to the law giving them an avenue to be eligible to vote.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

You shouldn't lump in court costs, restitution for goods purchased, etc.

Maybe they should just start putting people back in jail who don't pay fines like they used to. You realize many of these people will NEVER pay all their fines and fees unless there's an incentive to do so. But as it stands, people are rarely actually punished for not paying those fees, and those fees/costs/restitution, many times, are a huge part of their plea agreement with the state to reduce their sentence.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

If a prison term is fulfilled, then they should be just like anyone else. Shouldn't lose voting rights just because fines/fees are unpaid.

They lost voting rights when they broke the law. When they were sentenced or agreed to a plea agreement with the State, they were told to do x, y, and z as the terms of that sentence. If they have no fulfilled all terms of that sentence, as ordered by a judge, then no, they have not "fulfilled their prison term."
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Person B: former felon without rich family has to help support his family and does not get to vote until he pays fines, fees, and restitution for his phone time during prison

You really think it's "just" for it to shakeout like that?


maybe don't break the law if voting is that important to you

The vast majority of ex-cons wouldn't vote anyways unless someone compelled them to do it. And democrats have no shame harvesting votes from deplorables off the street. "Hey guys, come out and vote. We've got busses ready to take everyone to the closest polling location." "Not registered? Don't worry about that. Don't have an ID? Don't worry about that either." "Just make sure you vote for the person with a D next to their name."
This post was edited on 9/11/20 at 3:12 pm
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:18 pm to
I don't agree with this on principle. Nobody should be denied constitutional rights for committing crimes unless through amending the constitution. However, it is a good move politically for conservatives.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90799 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:21 pm to
Meh been like this for decades.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
73611 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Nobody should be denied constitutional rights for committing crimes unless through amending the constitution

They don't need to amend anything. Denying voting rights for being a criminal is outlined in Section 2 of the 14th Amendment.

quote:

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.


***See Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974)
This post was edited on 9/11/20 at 3:23 pm
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
9284 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Great example of the Republican party actively disenfranchising voters


One side is so pathetic they want criminals to vote to prop up there horrid and pathetic views......even ones still IN PRISON....
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
14990 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 4:00 pm to
Several counties are waving those fees and those former felons are registering now.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46369 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

What if they are unable to pay? Or what if the state has no idea how much money they actually owe?


Then they haven’t completed their sentence and restitution. These felons aren’t innocent victims. They left innocent victims in their wake and have obligations to meet to prove they are ready and able to be contributing members of society. Frankly, they are lucky they have a path to regain those rights at all.
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
6434 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Florida GOP was desperate to keep them away from the polls so they created a new law to stop these people from voting.

I'd say they fine tuned what it means to have "completed" your sentence and rehabilitation. If it's within the purview of Florida to allow convicted felons to vote, they should be able to state the terms, definitions, and exceptions.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

The ruling, which came as a disappointment to Democrats, comes less than two months before the November election.


FIFY
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46369 posts
Posted on 9/11/20 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

No. 4 Constitutional Amendment Article VI, Section 4. Voting Restoration Amendment This amendment restores the voting rights of Floridians with felony convictions after they complete all terms of their sentence including parole or probation. The amendment would not apply to those convicted of murder or sexual offenses

Date Effective: January 8, 2019


quote:

In mid-2019 Republican Governor DeSantis signed a bill into law which originated in the Florida Senate, SB 7066, which required that "people with felony records pay 'all fines and fees' associated with their sentence prior to the restoration of their voting rights"



Sounds like he signed a law that the more clearly defined the requirements already listed in the law passed given then a right to regain their vote.

Completing all terms of their sentence would include fines, fees, restitution, etc. Why would they regain their right to vote when they haven’t finished paying their debt to society?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram