- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Conservative films himself being shouted off campus by an angry crowd at HBCU
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
So these guys came on campus and set up with this bigass sign, WITHOUT PERMISSION and you think they had proper intent.
Never said that, Roger...
In fact , I agreed with you that trolling is not helpful to CK's movement.
Black people have a choice in their behavior- and they consistently choose poorly. So consistently, in fact, that this particular outcome surprised NO ONE.
Well... he didn't get curb stomped, sliced or shot... that would also have been on my bingo card.
Those kids could have debated him, ignored him or reported him. But... well...
1
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:05 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
All because some wypipo wanted to have a conversation.
No, y'all need to stop being so naive here.
If they wanted to have a conversation, they would have abided by the rules.
They were trolling.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:05 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
In fact , I agreed with you that trolling is not helpful to CK's movement.
Its not only that, its harmful to conservative groups who do the right thing
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:06 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They set up to get kicked out
Wouldn't have even been a story if that was ALL that occurred.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
So these guys came on campus and set up with this bigass sign, WITHOUT PERMISSION and you think they had proper intent.
Looks like someone didn't read the whole article. What a dumbass, yeah?
Since you obviously didn't read it, let me fill you in. You don't need permission to go to a public college like this guy did. Don't even need permission to set up a table or put up a sign. There are SOME schools that have rules about the type and size of sign you can use because they don't want people being hit and hurt by signs, and you have to follow those rules, but a public college can't deny a citizen access to a public campus.
Unless...
The administration determines that your presence would reasonably cause an unsafe environment, OR, your presence involves a protest or an organized event.
According to the article (which you obviously didn't read, like a hypocritical little bitch), security escorted the guy off because they classified his presence as a "protest."
Which, again, means that they feel like an anti-DEI message qualifies on its face as a subversive, protest message. Just like you do, apparently.
Most Americans think it's just an idea whose merits should be able to be debated. But not you or the administration at this college.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its not only that, its harmful to conservative groups who do the right thing
You're right. And wrong.
It ain't whitey's fault that group response to undesirable stimuli in the black population is pathological.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
they would have abided by the rules.
They did abide by the rules.
The administration had to stretch the rules to get them out.
You'd know that if you read the article.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:08 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Wouldn't have even been a story if that was ALL that occurred.
Yes it is
Jesus, you still dont get it. The attention is what they were after, not the discussion
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:09 pm to BoomerandSooner
you can't even respond to that tweet. Pathetic of the university. 
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Well, put in that perspective, do you agree with the TSU statement that all of the students acted professional and respectful?
They wanted to get tossed so they could film it and get clicks.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:09 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
You're right. And wrong.
Nah. He's just wrong.
quote:
It ain't whitey's fault that group response to undesirable stimuli in this black population is pathological.
This is right.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:10 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Since you obviously didn't read it, let me fill you in. You don't need permission to go to a public college like this guy did. Don't even need permission to set up a table or put up a sign.
i read the article, nothing like this was in there. The ones I read clearly said they didnt have approval.
Youre posting paragraphs of silly Prog speak.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:10 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
It ain't whitey's fault that group response to undesirable stimuli in the black population is pathological.
Youre on to something, you just dont realize it.
Why do you think they chose an HBCU?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:11 pm to GusAU
quote:
Well, put in that perspective, do you agree with the TSU statement that all of the students acted professional and respectful?
No.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:12 pm to GusAU
quote:
Well, put in that perspective, do you agree with the TSU statement that all of the students acted professional and respectful?
Also, Roger keeps arguing that Higby shouldn't have even been there but are we really going to pretend that mob of students were perfectly cordial until they found out that there were clerical issues relative to scheduling and that's what got em going?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They set up without informing the school, which, according to the school was necessary.
I am not sure how these dipshits missed that part.
Because you made it up. That's not what the article said.
They called the guy being there a "protest." Just him being there.
That's what they had to do to invoke that rule. Otherwise he did not need permission to be there.
You either didn't read it or you are intentionally lying about this. Which is it?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The attention is what they were after, not the discussion
And the black students gave it to him in spades.
Didn't have to... but they did.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:14 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Because you made it up. That's not what the article said.
They called the guy being there a "protest." Just him being there.
That's what they had to do to invoke that rule. Otherwise he did not need permission to be there.
You either didn't read it or you are intentionally lying about this. Which is it?
Like I said earlier, I'm sure it was the "scheduling failure" that had these students in an uproar and not the fact that they were presented with a conservative opinion that they've been indoctrinated since birth to hate that caused the mob.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre on to something, you just dont realize it.
I feel like I'm in the twilight zone... we ALL actually agree on something.
Black groups behave stereotypically.
We just differ on whether whitey is the cause.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 2:17 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Black groups behave stereotypically.
Absolutely.
If I want instant fame and e-notoriety I too would set up there with aggressive signage.
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News