- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:40 pm to AU86
quote:
Isn't she a real estate attorney who has never been in a criminal trial.
If this gets you torqued up, wait till you find out about the 2 dozen states that don't require you to have passed the bar to be a judge.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:47 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
De facto officer doctrine is well over 100 years old.
The Court dismissed the applicability of the "de facto officer" doctrine on pages 22, 23 of its Memorandum:
Court's Memorandum
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:48 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
What makes this ruling different from Cannon's?
Special counsel vs AG?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 1:56 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Special counsel vs AG?
Wrong vs. AG appointed the SC.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:04 pm to Jbird
quote:
Come on man you are fapping, couldn't wait to drop your big win on the board.
What big win? No one had a rational argument in opposition.
As usual when faced with facts and logical analysis that reflected poorly on the Trump Administration, you resorted to misplaced personal attacks on people who happened to know more than you on a particular subject.
There are MANY subjects of which I am ignorant. I appreciate this Board very much when someone informs me. It's one of the strengths of having this interactive platform that Chicken maintains. I have learned a great deal from you JBird.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:10 pm to IvoryBillMatt
What attack? My God Don't be a huge mangina.
You were proven correct.
You came with the thread.
Enjoy.
You were proven correct.
You came with the thread.
Enjoy.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:15 pm to AU86
quote:
Isn't she a real estate attorney who has never been in a criminal trial. This is a.joke.
It’s almost like every hire of Trump aside of Rubio is trying to sabotage him.
Who in tf said “Halligan is great for this pet project!”? How these people can frick this up is beyond my comprehension
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:18 pm to Jbird
quote:
What attack? My God Don't be a huge mangina.
You were right. Quick skimming, I'm not sure you even dropped your usual alter accusation.
Apologies and cheers. Gotta cut down on the Midol.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:23 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Who in tf said “Halligan is great for this pet project!”? How these people can frick this up is beyond my comprehension
THAT's the transcript I would like to read:
"OK, Siebert won't play ball, who ya got? EDVA is super important with the CIA and the Pentagon being headquartered there."
"I got it. Lindsey Halligan!"
I mean...how many people did they go through? I don't even blame Halligan. I think she did as good a job as possible with the James case.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:30 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Lol midol. Copy that wildcat.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:38 pm to VoxDawg
Thanks, Vox. I'm aware of that statute, but I think there's case law that suggests it wouldn't apply in the Comey case....looking....also, I think the "never presented the actual indictment to the full Grand Jury" might result in finding that no indictment was actually filed in this case.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:45 pm to VoxDawg
Vox, this explains the argument that the invalid indictment won't get the benefit of 18 USC 3288.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:00 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Lying to Congress is the least of Comey's worries. I'm not sweating today's development, one bit.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:02 pm to VoxDawg
Brother, Trump can’t get him on supposed layups.
Who do you think is going to spearhead the earth-shattering prosecution of Obama, et al and through what courts?
Who do you think is going to spearhead the earth-shattering prosecution of Obama, et al and through what courts?
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:04 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
THAT's the transcript I would like to read:
"OK, Siebert won't play ball, who ya got? EDVA is super important with the CIA and the Pentagon being headquartered there."
"I got it. Lindsey Halligan!"
I mean...how many people did they go through? I don't even blame Halligan. I think she did as good a job as possible with the James case.
The transcript exists. It was a botched Truth Social DM. Trump told Bondi that Halligan is a good lawyer AND a fan of Bondi. The rest is history.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:04 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Who in tf said “Halligan is great for this pet project!”? How these people can frick this up is beyond my comprehension
This pretty much sums up all of Trump's problems across both administrations.
They simply choose to put the worst people imaginable in every position.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:05 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
The transcript exists. It was a botched Truth Social DM. Trump told Bondi that Halligan is a good lawyer AND a fan of Bondi. The rest is history.
For real? He mentioned Halligan specifically in that DM?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:05 pm to boosiebadazz
Leave Vox alone, he still thinks that Trump was running a shadow presidency and that the military was going to come in and restore him to power after 2020.
Vox is special, and we shouldn't pick on such people.
Vox is special, and we shouldn't pick on such people.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 3:06 pm
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News