- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: John Durham empanels Washington Grand Jury in Russia Probe
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:21 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:21 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
FACK......a DC grand jury is bad news, the city is bluer than my midnight balls. Will be tough to get dems on the jury to agree on anything that helps orange man.
THIS
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:22 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I mean how much time do you have?
It was a serious question. I don't know what that poster was referencing when he/she said you were right.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:22 pm to GumboPot
quote:
FWIW, I read that Barr is going to be interviewed by Hannity tonight. I'm sure Hannity will press hard and dig deep.
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:27 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
That article is spinning faster than a Maytag washing machine.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Engineered by Durham to fail !!!
quote:
Witnesses who have met with Durham have said there's no discernible major target for prosecution in the probe.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:31 pm to 1234567k
quote:
Witnesses who have met with Durham have said there's no discernible major target for prosecution in the probe.
Yes, because John Durham's career screams "Dude who doesn't take the pursuit of justice seriously".
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:37 pm to VoxDawg
May 15, 2019 · | May 15, 2019 11:41 AM U.S. Attorney John Durham has already used a grand jury in Connecticut,
CNN doesn't have a clue. The Connecticut Grand Jury was seated long ago.
By the way ....the only thing Hannity is probing deeply is the hot little blonde on Fox in the morning .... that moved close to Hannity' home immediately after his divorce.
CNN doesn't have a clue. The Connecticut Grand Jury was seated long ago.
By the way ....the only thing Hannity is probing deeply is the hot little blonde on Fox in the morning .... that moved close to Hannity' home immediately after his divorce.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:38 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
no discernible major target for prosecution in the probe.
quote:
Yes, because John Durham's career screams "Dude who doesn't take the pursuit of justice seriously".
Both things can be true. They’re not mutually exclusive.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Grand juries don’t determine guilt or innocence but rather whether prosecution will go forward.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:41 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Both things can be true. They’re not mutually exclusive.
If he doesn't indict a major figure do you think we are a banana republic? Do you think the results will embolden the actors to continue the same charades in future elections?
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:41 pm to BoarEd
quote:
What was Boosie right about?
Nothing. Ever.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:42 pm to bluedragon
quote:
A grand jury in Washington's federal court, which Durham was using as part of his investigation, also has resumed work, people familiar with the matter said.
This article references a DC grand jury, though. And it doesn't specifically say what it's working on (grand juries are impaneled for lengthy periods and can work with different investigations). This reporting is super-vague.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:43 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
FACK......a DC grand jury is bad news
I don't know why you are worried. The criminals are already in Cuba. This is all for show; just sit around and watch the movie: "As the World Burns." Plus, those not in Cuba already have their indictments sealed and ready.
Personally, I'm planning a nice vaca for November to celebrate the win. Since I can just mail in my votes, there's no need to be in my home district on election day.
And, if I'm wrong, is a Jamaican-Indian, who grew up in Canada, that bad of a president?
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:44 pm to TigerDoc
Yep.
It’s moot point though.
If Durham is using a GJ, it’s probably been active for months
It’s moot point though.
If Durham is using a GJ, it’s probably been active for months
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:46 pm to 1234567k
quote:
Engineered by Durham to fail !!!
Don't listen to this POS negative Nancy.
I'll have to find the links, but a plumber and a car salesman on YouTube said it was a wrap when I was doing some deep research.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:48 pm to Magician2
quote:
If he doesn't indict a major figure do you think we are a banana republic? Do you think the results will embolden the actors to continue the same charades in future elections?
If he doesn’t indict a major actor then I think a lot of folks around here, including you, will have to come to terms with the fact that they were wrong about the criminality of some folks because they (the posters here) made the erroneous assumption that they knew the entire universe of information which those high-level FBI and CIA directors had at their disposal when making the decisions they did.
Posted on 8/13/20 at 3:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
FACK......a DC grand jury is bad news, the city is bluer than my midnight balls. Will be tough to get dems on the jury to agree on anything that helps orange man.
... is the Federal Court in Washington DC the right Washington Federal Court???
there is also the Western District of Washington Federal Court --- in the state of Washington ...
This post was edited on 8/13/20 at 3:50 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News