re: CNN Finally Covers Minnesota Day Care Fraud…

quote:

---

Just keep turning a blind eye to the fraud. 

---

quote:

---

involved directly and working hand-in-hand with Hamas for years, to the point of essentially facilitating its operation as a terrorist group, and apply that to the current peace plan......it doesn't really give you the warm and fuzzies.

That same UN, via the UNRWA, is still playing a significant role in the Gazan relief effort despite the fact that it still refuses to recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization.

---

quote:

---

This is what you quoted. Exactly.

Go look at X.

This was pushed by everyone including the owner of X, the VP And the Presidents son.

And then you sycophants followed.

Congrats?

---

quote:

---

The most prominent "percentage-based" method for determining if something is a psyop that I've found circulating online (particularly in conspiracy and alternative media communities) is the NCI Engineered Reality Scoring System.

What It Is
Developed or promoted by the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) or associated figures (sometimes linked to discussions around Chase Hughes, a behavioral expert who trains operatives and appeared on podcasts like Shawn Ryan's to discuss manipulation detection).
It's a scoring checklist (often 20 points or similar) where you evaluate an event, narrative, or story based on specific indicators of psychological manipulation (e.g., sudden narrative shifts, emotional triggers, timing convenience, media coordination, group behavior changes, etc.).
Each matching indicator adds points, resulting in a total score that translates to a percentage likelihood or probability that the event is "engineered reality" (i.e., a psyop, staged manipulation, or disinformation campaign).

How It Works (Typical Structure)
Users go through a list of yes/no or weighted questions like:
Does the story provoke intense fear/outrage without verifiable evidence?
Is there rapid, unified media amplification?

Suspicious timing (e.g., distracts from another scandal)?
Inconsistencies in details or witness accounts?
Sudden shifts in public opinion or behavior?

Higher scores mean higher "engineered" probability, often categorized like:
Low score: Organic event.
Medium: Possible influence.
High (e.g., 70%+): Likely psyop.
It's shared as a tool for "mathematical precision" in spotting propaganda, with charts or memes showing the scoring rubric.

---

quote:

---

It has been dizzying to watch so many otherwise solid minded MAGA enthusiasts on this very board turn on a dime and suddenly become clapping seals for these regime change operations.

---

quote:

---

If these daycenters anything like Utah, children were present, but operating way below expected capacity.

Utah has a form to notate two inspector observations:

(1) The number of children present.
(2) The number of children that were the children of employees.

For #1, the number of children were in the 1, 2, 3 range despite being licensed for 16 and reporting 0 vacancies.
For #2, exactly zero children of employees were reported.

This is why that these daycenters have actual facilities, actual offices. They are capable of handling drop-in, unannounced visits. They know how to get around all the inspection rules.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Bud, by that definition, everything is a psyop. You have to apply ALL THE RULES and rank it on a percentage. Greater than 70 percent is probably a psyop. Less than 40 is probably not. You have to use the ENTIRE metric to determine a psyop. Give me your math on the other rules.

---