- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clarence Thomas dropped a bit of 2ndA history in his opinion that I never knew before
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:01 pm to texridder
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:01 pm to texridder
quote:
I thought Thomas and the rest of the R Supremes were Originalists.
They are.
quote:
Sounds to me like they get awful unoriginalist when they want to score one for their side.
That's because you are an uneducated LWNJ imbecile of the highest order. I would suggest you read the actual opinion authored, but we all know that without colorful pictures your drooling retard self isn't going to bother.
0
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:16 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Is Thomas running for office?
No?
Then SHUT THE frick UP.
No?
Then SHUT THE frick UP.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:41 pm to International_Aggie
quote:
“The right to keep and BEAR arms…”
That has nothing to do with my post about Originalism.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:45 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The first gun control laws were directed against blacks.
Hense, along comes that pesky 14th Amendment.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:53 pm to Clames
quote:
The Heller decision affirmed the individual right theory, not created it, and put the last nails in the coffin of the collective theories that were basically on life-support only in academic institutions.
Scalia must not be as smart as you because he spent a good amount of ink in his Heller opinion discussing individual right theory.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Breyer’s dissent is as intellectually dishonest as his dissent in the last significant 2nd amendment case. In the previous case he cited as authority in his dissent a historical study by a Virginia historian regarding the meaning of “militia”, “arms”, and the evolution of the 2nd amendment. Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in that case, it was revealed and established that the historian’s work was flawed and debunked. Breyer cited it anyway and he and his clerks knew or should have known that it was false.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:57 pm to texridder
quote:
I thought Thomas and the rest of the R Supremes were Originalists. Sounds to me like they get awful unoriginalist when they want to score one for their side. That must be optional
Remember what I said in the other thread about thinking you’re posting gotchas but but it’s nothing more than typical progressive lunatic hypocritical nonsense? And about you not being intelligent enough to warrant an actual conversation?
This is what both of those look like in practice.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 8:58 pm to texridder
quote:
Scalia must not be as smart as you because he spent a good amount of ink in his Heller opinion discussing individual right theory.
Oh he did, but only because dimwits like you needed the lesson. Obviously he used too many big words and assumed your grasp of the English language was higher than that of a 5 year old when it is very clear it is not. In fact, if you weren't such a drooling moron and read all of the Heller opinions, you'd know that the court was unanimous in the individual right interpretation. This dissenting opinion held for the "narrow" individual right, still not a collective right as you so stupidly cling to...
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:03 pm to beachdude
Breyer no shite cited a Time article that relies on a study that includes anyone under 20 as "children."
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:04 pm to texridder
quote:
Hense, along comes that pesky 14th Amendment.
And you would like to discuss topics of, and in, some depth.
What a moron you are.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:09 pm to texridder
quote:
Hense, along comes that pesky 14th Amendment.
Did you type out “hense” like an illiterate peasant and then compound your error by putting some extraneous and utterly useless comma after it? You did.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:13 pm to texridder
quote:guess youee going to need to expound on your point for me then.
That has nothing to do with my post about Originalism
The ruling today is about as originalist as could be.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:18 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
You're the John Roberts of the Poliboard.
The poli board has become such a staunch echo chamber.
Since 2015 when I was invested heavily here it's changed so much. So many posters banned for being "concerned trolls""shills" etc.
It's gotten to the point if you are not even remotely 1000000% team trump (and you voted for him twice) but say anything that's an ounce negative that you are labeled as a troll and shite on without any substance in threads.
That's the thing the poliboard is missing more than anything is actual dialogue in threads instead of ridiculous 3rd grade comments.
Sucks this is what's become
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:28 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Downvoted because its been that way since 1776. Dont care what the left thinks. When slaves were freed and became citizens, they had that same right. Should have always been free and had that right but democrats loved slavery.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:48 pm to beachdude
quote:
In the previous case he cited as authority in his dissent a historical study by a Virginia historian regarding the meaning of “militia”, “arms”, and the evolution of the 2nd amendment.
Do you know the name of the Virginian historian or the name of the source where you read about that Virginian historian.?
Thanks.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 10:54 pm to Magician2
quote:
The poli board has become such a staunch echo chamber.
You’re posting this in HHTM’s thread. He’s easily the worst poster on this board. I’d rather read one of Hank’s posts or pretend to care if Decatur died or lived than have HHTM post here.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:05 pm to texridder
quote:
Sounds to me like they get awful unoriginalist when they want to score one for their side.
Sounds to me like you have no idea what the frick you’re talking about.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Clarence Thomas dropped a bit of 2ndA history in his opinion that I never knew before
You would have known sooner if you would have searched this forum before posting a topic already discussed this same day.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:41 pm to Clames
quote:
Oh he did, but only because dimwits like you needed the lesson.
You're an ignorant asswipe, and you obviously have a serious inferiority complex to be so defensive when you post on here.
Go away.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 7:49 pm to troyt37
quote:
Hey Einstein, exactly what is unoriginalist about having the opinion
It looks like you don't have a clue about what I was talking about so I'll just pass.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News