Started By
Message
locked post

CBS Warns Dems: You Could ‘Lose’ Impeachment With Such ‘Limited’ Evidence

Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:09 pm
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29670 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:09 pm
it almost seems like they have a "rooting interest"

almost....

LINK

quote:

The journalists on CBS This Morning, Monday, offered a surprising look at how Watergate differed with the current impeachment push. Major Garrett and analyst Jonathan Turley warned that Democrats could “lose” the impeachment battle with such “limited” evidence.

As he played footage of Walter Cronkite in 1974, Garrett contrasted, “President Trump's attorneys have had very little access to evidence or the witnesses. It has been conducted, this investigation, largely in secret.”
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48900 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:10 pm to
Lol how it’s “like Watergate”

No crime, no coverup......yawn
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:15 pm to
correction

They will lose impeachment with no actual evidence.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:16 pm to
Best part is how people claim to be flag loving Americans are putting up with the swamp potus preventing testimony.
Obstruction.

Gop reeks of cowardice.
Sworn to uphold constitution.
Now individuals are refusing to bulk process their cases in hopes of preventing the public from hearing the awful truth.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:16 pm to
Says CBS who just fired the wrong ABC Epstein whistleblower.

Why the change of heart?
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30581 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

They will lose impeachment with no actual evidence.




What about the crime? I still don't know what it is.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

What about the crime? I still don't know what it is.


must be you dont want to know how impeachment is framed.

There need be no crime.

No crime.

All there has to be is 2/3rds of senate agrees with an article of impeachment written and voted aye by majority of house.

The attempt to extort the ukraine to make a public statement of intention to look into bidens doings in return for $400 million that was actually already set up by congress. Buden was at the time leading polls. Trump was using my tax dollars to extort help in the next election. He was asking ukraine to help him win 2020. The president has no authority of that money. But he sent gulianis team to make the threat.
Asking foreign intervention in us election. Now you see. You all see. Asked ukraine to help gop in election. Get it?

So. No crime but immoral and counter to anerican values.

Will your senator allow trump to bully them?
Will you stand up for america and demand your senators vote trump out.

Posted by LSUBadger
Member since Jan 2014
2238 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:31 pm to
You are such a shrill pussy.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140327 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Will you stand up for america


Aye. I will. I will continue to vote against your prog candidates at every opportunity.

The US will never be a socialist country, bitch.

Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59813 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:34 pm to
TIL that ZERO evidence = "limited evidence"
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 5:12 am
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79646 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:37 pm to
Go eat your stewed prunes and go to bed, Otto.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
5312 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:39 pm to
So was hunter Biden’s involvement in Ukraine legitimate? Deserved the job he had and was just interacting in every day commerce? No political favors exchanged? Probably discussing drilling and exploration strategy huh?

When joe Biden lied about knowing about his sons interaction with the oil czars over there, he had no reason to lie. He just conveniently forgot about playing golf with them?

Now that we have established there is legitimate reason for trump to suspect there was foul play under Obama and Biden’s term, was he supposed to remain silent?
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

The attempt to extort the ukraine to make a public statement of intention to look into bidens doings in return for $400 million that was actually already set up by congress. Buden was at the time leading polls. Trump was using my tax dollars to extort help in the next election. He was asking ukraine to help him win 2020. The president has no authority of that money. But he sent gulianis team to make the threat.


DAMN!! Stop making LSU look bad. A president can fricking extort the shite out of any country he wants.

He can grab that fricking country by the pussy, make it his bitch, do her doggy style, sloppy, dry, whatever.

My president, and our country, can fricking lay sanctions, tariffs, drop the fricking H-bomb on another country. To make those type of decisions impeachable by another branch of government is to advocate tyranny, fool.

If you are advocating the abdication of our sovereignty and national defense, then please go turn in your LSU diploma. You are obviously aberration of our fine institution.
Posted by TheGooner
Baton Rouwage
Member since Jul 2016
996 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

The attempt to extort the ukraine to make a public statement of intention to look into bidens doings in return for $400 million that was actually already set up by congress.


I saw Kurt Eichenwald tweeting the same nonsense this weekend.

How could the act of withholding a GIFT to a foreign country (which didn’t even happen) be considered extortion?

Do you think that foreign countries are entitled to our money?
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57205 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:46 pm to
By "limited evidence" do they mean "no evidence?"
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

must be you dont want to know how impeachment is framed.

There need be no crime.

No crime.

Yeah its not like its worded that way in the US Constitution, or anything. I swear, you libtards just keep proving how limited your comprehension skills actually are.
quote:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Every listed in there is a violation of law, not one word about
quote:

immoral and counter to anerican values.


Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22135 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:01 pm to
LOL at the angry Dems in this thread! Haha OP must have nailed it to make them so mad.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Trump was using my tax dollars to extort help in the next election.


What I want to know is what he thought Biden was doing with $2 billion of his tax dollars that he apparently gives no shits about
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

What I want to know is what he thought Biden was doing with $2 billion of his tax dollars that he apparently gives no shits about


Yup, apparently the left has no problem with letting their leaders leverage the power of their office to advance the interests of their wayward sons' personal gain.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105403 posts
Posted on 11/11/19 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Limited


That’s not how you spell “Zero”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram