- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carbon Capture
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:12 pm to BabyDraco1499
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:12 pm to BabyDraco1499
It's fuqin bullshite from start to finish! I wish you idiots would buy a brain!
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:14 pm to BabyDraco1499
quote:
Of course the businesses have pushed it,
Which ones
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:26 pm to BabyDraco1499
Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham support it......
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:46 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
“But according to my geology professor friend,it will not damage the environment”
Unless it leaks and pushs salt water into aquifers from which we are dependent on for water.Or if the CO2 itself leaks into the aquifers which will form carbonic acid and also ruins our
Unless it leaks and pushs salt water into aquifers from which we are dependent on for water.Or if the CO2 itself leaks into the aquifers which will form carbonic acid and also ruins our
Posted on 12/10/25 at 9:55 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
We're told it amounts to 0.04% of Earth's atmosphere. Capture that.
They do.
You get $140 per metric tonne tax credit of CO2 sequestered through direct carbon capture.
You get $85 per metric time tax credit of CO2 sequestered from the tail pipe of a power plant/ refinery/ethanol plant, etc. The concentration of CO2 from combustion or fermentation is 55% or higher so it’s a lot easier to capture and the tax credits are lower.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 10:09 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
“But according to my geology professor friend,it will not damage the environment”
Unless it leaks and pushs salt water into aquifers from which we are dependent on for water.Or if the CO2 itself leaks into the aquifers which will form carbonic acid and also ruins our water supply.
Brad LeBlanc ,a geologist has given several presentations outlining the potential dangers of Co2 sequestration.I’ve attended 4 of them ,he scares the shite out of me.There are a couple of videos on YouTube.
One of the proposed sites is only about 10 miles from my house,(at Hot Wells) I suppose the same aquifer from which my water comes from.How do people live without water.They can’t.
People would have no choice but to abandon their homes and move out of state.I’m 75 years old,I want to die in my home ,on my family land that has been in the family since 1920.
It’s all bullshite,that will do nothing to help the environment.
Some LSU people were at one meeting assuring everyone the Co2 wouldn’t leak.They don’t really know that,no doubt they are being paid off to be in favor of this scam.
The first and only sequestration project is in Decatur Illinois which was supposed to have the ideal sandstone formation in which to sequester Co2.
The experts were sure it wouldn’t leak.The experts were wrong,it did leak.
Unless it leaks and pushs salt water into aquifers from which we are dependent on for water.Or if the CO2 itself leaks into the aquifers which will form carbonic acid and also ruins our water supply.
Brad LeBlanc ,a geologist has given several presentations outlining the potential dangers of Co2 sequestration.I’ve attended 4 of them ,he scares the shite out of me.There are a couple of videos on YouTube.
One of the proposed sites is only about 10 miles from my house,(at Hot Wells) I suppose the same aquifer from which my water comes from.How do people live without water.They can’t.
People would have no choice but to abandon their homes and move out of state.I’m 75 years old,I want to die in my home ,on my family land that has been in the family since 1920.
It’s all bullshite,that will do nothing to help the environment.
Some LSU people were at one meeting assuring everyone the Co2 wouldn’t leak.They don’t really know that,no doubt they are being paid off to be in favor of this scam.
The first and only sequestration project is in Decatur Illinois which was supposed to have the ideal sandstone formation in which to sequester Co2.
The experts were sure it wouldn’t leak.The experts were wrong,it did leak.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 10:13 pm to BabyDraco1499
Not all CO2 that is captured is used for the purpose of injecting it back into the earth for storage or EOR. One other use for it is to combine it with hydrogen and create methanol.
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant. It can be pushed through a pipeline or transported to be another plant to be combined with Hydrogen to create Methanol. Methanol has an assortment of uses.
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant. It can be pushed through a pipeline or transported to be another plant to be combined with Hydrogen to create Methanol. Methanol has an assortment of uses.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 10:14 pm to BabyDraco1499
Not all CO2 that is captured is used for the purpose of injecting it back into the earth for storage or EOR. One other use for it is to combine it with hydrogen and create methanol.
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant. It can be pushed through a pipeline or transported to be another plant to be combined with Hydrogen to create Methanol. Methanol has an assortment of uses.
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant. It can be pushed through a pipeline or transported to be another plant to be combined with Hydrogen to create Methanol. Methanol has an assortment of uses.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 10:20 pm to Sassafrasology
And it’s 100% scam.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:17 am to SouthEasternKaiju
I love being a geologist and reading about all of the fearmongering. 
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:02 am to BabyDraco1499
Landowners of depleted oil/gas fields would love some of that for royalties. What the phuck do you think that Gray Stream wants if for their ranch at Ged, LA south of Vinton. It was formerly one of the most, if not the most prolific oilfields per surface acre in the history of oil. Lacassane Company would love to have it. Oil and gas were produced from there for 90 years, Their mineral rights include a big chunk of Lacassine Wildlife Refuge with the land sold to the Feds pre WWII with royalties paying first paying off the marshland purchase then going 100% to the company.
They get paid in perpetuity by those buying space for sequestration.
They get paid in perpetuity by those buying space for sequestration.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 7:15 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:10 am to LSUA 75
quote:
Unless it leaks and pushs salt water into aquifers from which we are dependent on for water.Or if the CO2 itself leaks into the aquifers which will form carbonic acid and also ruins our
I oppose these projects as a massive waste or money on one side; and completely ineffective at a macro level on the other side. But this idea is mostly bs fear mongering. Especially if you consider some of the hazardous waste that we've been putting down wells for decades.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 7:17 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:13 am to BabyDraco1499
If you hear someone speaking seriously about carbon capture you're either dealing with a moron or a thief.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:22 am to BigD45
quote:
I love being a geologist and reading about all of the fearmongering.
I'm no geologist but understand what pressures are at depth and how that affects CO2. I bet the fear mongers would love to have natural gas royalties from any land they own and would have no problem that CO2 and or H2S are injected after being removed. This is been done for eons.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:36 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant. It can be pushed through a pipeline or transported to be another plant to be combined with Hydrogen to create Methanol. Methanol has an assortment of uses
Methanol plants exist where natural gas is cheap and plentiful. All in the US were gone by 2005. They have returned since cheap natural gas is plentiful. Without methanol there is no polyester resin be it for making fabric or your bottle of soda. To make hydrogen from solar or wind supplied electricity the water used has to be ultra pure and the capital investment is the same for the water as it is for the electrolysis reactors with easily damage membrane filters.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 7:38 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:38 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
The CO2 can be captured during the combustion that occurs at a power plant.
Capturing CO2 after combustion is not really feasible or economical.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:43 am to texag7
quote:
Capturing CO2 after combustion is not really feasible or economical.
Most modern power plants have wet scrubbers already for particulates, capturing is easy.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:35 am to KamaCausey_LSU
“But this idea is mostly fear mongering”
My position is don’t play Russian Roulette with our water supply.If there is a 1% chance of losing our water supply it’s not worth the risk,especially since CO2 is not the existential threat to human survival as the “ fear mongering “
pro sequestration group like to portray it.
CO2 sequestration is nothing but a boondoggle scam and a waste of taxpayers dollars.
We have a real life example,in Decatur Illinois.The “experts” were sure it was the ideal location,impermeable cap rock,yada,yada.It leaked despite assurances it wouldn’t.
My position is don’t play Russian Roulette with our water supply.If there is a 1% chance of losing our water supply it’s not worth the risk,especially since CO2 is not the existential threat to human survival as the “ fear mongering “
pro sequestration group like to portray it.
CO2 sequestration is nothing but a boondoggle scam and a waste of taxpayers dollars.
We have a real life example,in Decatur Illinois.The “experts” were sure it was the ideal location,impermeable cap rock,yada,yada.It leaked despite assurances it wouldn’t.
Popular
Back to top


0






