- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Burr breaks with Nunes: 'Sound reasons' for judges to approve FISA warrant
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:23 pm
LINK
Well, I guess Burr is a part of the resistance now.
quote:
"I don't think I ever expressed that I thought the FISA application came up short," Burr said when asked about House Republican memo alleging FBI and Justice Department abuses of the FISA process. "There (were) sound reasons as to why judges issued the FISA."
Burr's comments once again put him at odds with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, who spearheaded the memo on FISA abuses.
Well, I guess Burr is a part of the resistance now.
26
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:25 pm to tigerinDC09
Burr has been a shitass all along. Basically warner runs the committee
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:25 pm to tigerinDC09
1st downvote
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:25 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
"I don't think I ever expressed that I thought the FISA application came up short," Burr said when asked about House Republican memo alleging FBI and Justice Department abuses of the FISA process. "There (were) sound reasons as to why judges issued the FISA."
Which were?
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:26 pm to tigerinDC09
He needs to list the "sound reasons"
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:27 pm to tigerinDC09
Burr is a Democrat so of course he did
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:27 pm to 3rdgentgr
Yes, but can't...typical hyperbole
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:28 pm to tigerinDC09
What a cuck.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:28 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Which were?
Apparently the parts of the FISA that were redacted.
A republican head of the senate intelligence committee who has seen all of the redacted parts and doesn't think anything was done improperly. Go figure.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:29 pm to tigerinDC09
This is meaningless without him giving reasons.
And the way the Senate Intel Committee has conducted itself doesn't lend much credibility to them.
And the way the Senate Intel Committee has conducted itself doesn't lend much credibility to them.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:29 pm to 3rdgentgr
quote:
He needs to list the "sound reasons"
Probably classified.... I'm guessing we'll find out eventually.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:30 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
And the way the Senate Intel Committee has conducted itself doesn't lend much credibility to them.
As opposed to the House intel?
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:30 pm to tigerinDC09
Care to explain in your own words why you think this is the case?
Appeals to authority aren’t enough
Appeals to authority aren’t enough
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:31 pm to tigerinDC09
It is rigged, folks.
The whole thing.
The whole thing.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:31 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
has seen all of the redacted parts and doesn't think anything was done improperly.
Are we sure about that?
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:31 pm to tigerinDC09
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:31 pm to tigerinDC09
Probably Burr is correct. National Security is our government's most critical function. But, they sure didn't use the same metrics when determining threats posed by Clinton and her cabal!!!
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:32 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Probably classified.... I'm guessing we'll find out eventually.
Yes you will..
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:32 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
As opposed to the House intel?
No one in the government had credibility with me right now until they earn it.
I want to see the full FISA application with no redactions.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Care to explain in your own words why you think this is the case? Appeals to authority aren’t enough
Sure, from what all of the FISA experts I've seen and read, nothing out of the ordinary occurred in the process.
Most people in here will point to the DNC and Hillary Clinton not being specifically named in the FISA, but miss the point that NO ONE (besides Carter Page) is specifically named. The source's motivations were sufficiently outlined in the FISA
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News