- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brennan Security Clearance Gone
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:05 pm to redneck hippie
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:05 pm to redneck hippie
You have. Try reading the thread again.
A better question might be “what was the reason... they need to retain security clearance?”
A better question might be “what was the reason... they need to retain security clearance?”
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:09 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
seems like I'm not getting an answer to this
hadn't been officially given yet last i looked
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:14 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
ETA: People have been allowed to treat US Security Clearance as a commodity for far too long. Now John Brennan can't. The list of people under review certainly aren't the only ones doing it, but they certainly are all doing it. So stopping them is better than not stopping them.
Baw, just admit it. 45 is in full MELT. “He’s doing this to protect America”. lol
Is so hilarious to hear 95% of this board (Commie Cucks) take the side of a draft dodging coward while attacking patriots that have served in the military and risked their lives.
When the NFL protesters start taking a knee...and then 45 shiats on John McCain in a twitt, I’m sure we’ll see more faux outrage about how the players “hate the military”
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:17 pm to WillieNelsonsDoobie
How does someone with the name Willie Nelson's Doobie white knight for an authoritarian tyrant like John Brennan?
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:20 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
debrief all government and contractor personnel who no longer require such access
pop quiz on your own quote: does that mean revoking clearances, and not just opening up certain positions to people without clearances if clearances are not actually necessary?
quote:
a comprehensive review validating that each government employee or contractor who has been granted a security clearance continues to require such eligibility for access to classified national security information in support of their current position or your agency’s mission
pop quiz: is re-assessing whether a clearance is required for a particular role the same thing as revoking an active clearance?
answer key: no and no
great point anyway, champ!
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:20 pm to SCLibertarian
Didn’t you hear? Liberals love the police state now.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:21 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
A better question might be “what was the reason... they need to retain security clearance?”
that's a great question too. but it's a completely different question than I asked. Which no. there hasn't been an answer given to.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:24 pm to WillieNelsonsDoobie
quote:
and then 45 shiats on John McCain in a twitt,
John McCain has killed more members of the US Military than al qaeda and isis combined.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:41 pm to 90proofprofessional
That request was in response to the Snowden leaks, mr fussy pants.
Again: former federal employee leaking to the media. Just. Like. Brennan.
Again: former federal employee leaking to the media. Just. Like. Brennan.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:51 pm to Vacherie Saint
so was Obama targeting Bush-era people with that or something?
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:53 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
Which no. there hasn't been an answer given to.
Yes. Yes, there has.
A) he is no longer a federal employee
B) he is not a private sector contracting with the IC
C) his advice is not being sought by the current administration or IC leadership.
D) he has openly accused the current administration of “treason” as well as “high crimes and misdemeanors”
E) he is a subject in an OIG investigation into FISA abuses and spying on the Trump campaign.
F) he has leaked classified intel to the media (a felony), and now is employed by the media.
No problems here!
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:55 pm to 90proofprofessional
Ah, you’ve finally caught your tail!
So you think that Obama was trying to punish Bush by revoking Snowden’s clearances?
So you think that Obama was trying to punish Bush by revoking Snowden’s clearances?
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:56 pm to Vacherie Saint
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 3:32 am
Posted on 8/15/18 at 4:59 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
So you think that Obama was trying to punish Bush by revoking Snowden’s clearances?
L,JL
Posted on 8/15/18 at 5:00 pm to DelU249
They can get you “six ways from Sunday” according to Chuck. Trump knows first hand how that game works, doesn’t he?
But TDSprofessional is probably right. Trump is just being pissy.
But TDSprofessional is probably right. Trump is just being pissy.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 5:02 pm to 90proofprofessional
I don’t even know what that means.
Your arguments have devolved from statements, to emojis, to incoherent letters.
Your arguments have devolved from statements, to emojis, to incoherent letters.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 5:04 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
How does someone with the name Willie Nelson's Doobie white knight for an authoritarian tyrant like John Brennan?
World turned upside down.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 5:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
ah, i assumed you spoke the language of incoherent letters fluently, given your just adorably-sad attempt at a gotcha there
so are you alleging that some political enemies were being targeted there or not?
so are you alleging that some political enemies were being targeted there or not?
Popular
Back to top



1







