- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BR “Thrive” plan vote this November. Don’t get hoodwinked. Vote NO!
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:45 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:45 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Isn't the Thrive Plan proposal to put the transfer of taxes from the dedicated over funded agencies into the City-Parish's General Fund?
Yes, but in the past this means they will spend these revenues on BR services as well as parish services.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:50 pm to HouseMom
quote:
But the parish received $165 million in federal ARPA money to supposedly fix our major issues, and we also pay sewer fees with our water bill. My one home is over $100/month. Multiply that times every home and business in the parish. And isn't drainage supposed to be supported using sales instead of property taxes anyway?
Storm water management should be funded on a yearly basis. You can’t clean drainage arteries once every half century and keep up. It needs regular maintenance and if my taxes went for that I would be fine.
Sewer. That’s different. We are already paying a healthy tax and you are right. It doesn’t need more money.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:55 pm to kingbob
quote:
Voting no is imbecilic. Voting no will force new taxes to pay for city services and the gutting of BRPD, BRFD, and public works.
Perhaps the CITY should raise taxes on CITY property (or raise the CITY'S sales tax) to cover the shortfall.
I am sure all of the property owners that flocked to be annexed into the City before and and after the St.G. petition (disposition of afters is still up in the air) will be happy as Hell to pay higher property taxes (looking at you OLOL and BRGH, as well as MOL and L'auberge).
Posted on 10/20/25 at 12:55 pm to doubleb
quote:The current dedicated taxes being reduced also pay for services within the BR city limits.
but in the past this means they will spend these revenues on BR services as well as parish services.
From Coach Edwards' remarks about the plan quoted in the OP's link:
quote:
“Tonight’s vote by the Metro Council is an important step forward for East Baton Rouge Parish. I want to thank the Council for recognizing the urgent need to stabilize our budget, maintain critical services, and reduce long-term debt — all without raising taxes. The Thrive! plan is a fiscally responsible path forward that benefits the entire parish.”
Those re-dedications will result in a one-time infusion of $52.4 million that will be used to pay down debt, immediately putting the parish in a stronger financial position and reducing the burden on future budgets. In addition, a one-time payment of $6 million will be invested in parish-wide priorities such as critical infrastructure, drainage improvements, and public safety.
As I recall Coach Edwards was and is a strong supporter of St. George. And it helped him defeat Broome-Hilda.
He is doing exactly what he promised to do.
So you're going to oppose him?!?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:03 pm to LSURussian
quote:
The current dedicated taxes being reduced also pay for services within the BR city limits.
Sure, BR is in the parish and should enjoy Library service, MARC services and COA services.
I have no problem with using the tax “savings “ for parish services. Storm water, yes. Sheriff, yes. DA, yes.
But is money going to services that are just city services? I believe they are in this plan.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:10 pm to doubleb
quote:And I believe you're being paranoid from years of being lied to by Broome-Hilda.
But is money going to services that are just city services? I believe they are in this plan.
I believe Coach Edwards is different from her.
His plan won't cost St. George residents a penny more in taxes. And the DA, Sheriff and drainage projects (all parish wide service providers) will be better funded to benefit the entire parish.
Give him a chance to do exactly what he promised he'd do when you voted for him...
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:16 pm to Riverside
went into the bluebonnet location last week, place was staffed better than a busy resturant on sat night.
4 people sitting at the "help" desk lol
4 people sitting at the "help" desk lol
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:19 pm to LSURussian
quote:
The current dedicated taxes being reduced also pay for services within the BR city limits.
Yes, but the point is to prevent parish funds to be used ONLY in the city limits. There is a history of this.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:20 pm to udtiger
quote:The Thrive Plan doesn't raise taxes on anybody in East Baton Rouge Parish.
Perhaps the CITY should raise taxes on CITY property
The plan is to transfer some of the taxes from some parish wide departments to other parish wide departments like the DA, Sheriff and roads and drainage, which is what Coach Edwards campaigned on doing.
It's a better prioritizing of the parish taxes we already pay which I have been screaming EBR Parish has needed to do for decades.
Total taxes under the plan will be unchanged parish wide.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:22 pm to HouseMom
quote:You just don't get it.
but the point is to prevent parish funds to be used ONLY in the city limits.
The parish taxes being proposed to be transferred ALREADY pay for some services in Baton Rouge.
Baton Rouge is a part of East Baton Rouge Parish.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:23 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Give him a chance to do exactly what he promised he'd do when you voted for him...
I have lived here all my life. 74 years.
Woody Dumas promised he’d fix our streets. He hit Phase I passed. It covered North of Florida Blvd. Today s great grid pattern. Major arteries North of Florida were all four laned. Look at Evangeline, Winbourne, Choctaw, Woodale, Lobdell, Ardenwood and all the others. Phase II South BR never passed.
Pat Screen made the Library backers mad. He cut Library funding. The library backers got him to put a new dedicated library tax on the ballot. It passed. The library got more revenues, but Screen quit funding the libraries and instead he used their original funding for his pet projects.
EBRSS told me that if I vote for their plan that we’d get new schools, higher paid better teachers, and better school discipline. I voted for that and while we’ve gotten new schools, we haven’t got better teachers or school discipline.
I hope you can now understand why I’m a doubting Thomas.
This post was edited on 10/20/25 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:24 pm to doubleb
quote:They already are.
But is money going to services that are just city services?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:25 pm to LSURussian
Trust me, I get it. Color me skeptical.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:27 pm to LSURussian
quote:
They already are.
How are property taxes from the Library Tax, the COA tax and the MARC tax going to any services not included in their mandate?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:33 pm to doubleb
quote:Sure I can.
I hope you can now understand why I’m a doubting Thomas.
So, if you're happy with the DA, Sheriff and drainage being underfunded for services in St. George, just vote NO on the Thrive plan.
Edwards will fail on what he promised which got him elected, with a strong majority of St. George voters voting for him, and nothing will change, including the amount of taxes we all pay.
YAY...?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 1:37 pm to LSURussian
quote:
So, if you're happy with the DA, Sheriff and drainage being underfunded for services in St. George, just vote NO on the Thrive plan. Edwards will fail on what he promised which got him elected, with a strong majority of St. George voters voting for him, and nothing will change, including the amount of taxes we all pay. YAY...?
Do you know for sure that all of the money saved from giving the three agencies a haircut is going to be used for parish services? Parish debt?
Remember money in the general fund is allocated by the mayor and approved by the council. I believe you are younger than I, do you believe the next Dem mayor will handke your taxes as well as Sid?
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:03 pm to doubleb
quote:I'm going by what Coach Edwards said about the plan. I quoted him word-for-word earlier. I trust him to not be lying about the Plan.
Do you know for sure that all of the money saved from giving the three agencies a haircut is going to be used for parish services?
District 9 council member Dwight Hudson, who represents the eastern most council district all within the city of St. George, co-wrote the Thrive Plan. Is he lying about the plan, too??
quote:LINK
District 9 council member Dwight Hudson, who helped to write the plan, emphasized that it was a major accomplishment to figure out an agreeable compromise.
So, if Coach Edwards & Dwight Hudson are liars, then why did a majority of St. George voters vote for Edwards & Hudson?
It appears that St. George voters refuse to accept "Yes" for an answer...
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:04 pm to LSURussian
quote:
The Thrive Plan doesn't raise taxes on anybody in East Baton Rouge Parish.
The plan is to transfer some of the taxes from some parish wide departments to other parish wide departments like the DA, Sheriff and roads and drainage, which is what Coach Edwards campaigned on doing.
It's a better prioritizing of the parish taxes we already pay which I have been screaming EBR Parish has needed to do for decades.
Total taxes under the plan will be unchanged parish wide.
I understand the stated purpose.
This is to plug the hole created by St.G.; therefore, it is safe to presume that at least some of that $$$ is going to go for solely city services. Either directly, or because already collected "parish" revenue can now be allocated to those services with the Thrive money to pick up the slack (think lottery money and education)
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:06 pm to doubleb
quote:
Do you know for sure that all of the money saved from giving the three agencies a haircut is going to be used for parish services? Parish debt?
There's no way to know this because they're skimming from dedicated funds and just throwing it in the "general fund" bucket. In my opinion, there is zero reason to structure it this way unless something shady is going on. Lower the millages of the library, COA, etc. and start from scratch if they need money for other specific services.
Posted on 10/20/25 at 2:10 pm to HouseMom
quote:With all due respect, after reading your posts in this thread, 'skeptical' is not the word I would color you with...
Color me skeptical.
Popular
Back to top


1



