- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:49 am to PaperTiger
quote:Not exactly.
I was under the assumption that complications from medical abortions are within 24 hours of taking the medicines.
Mifepristone is taken first, usually at a healthcare facility. 24-48 hours later misoprostol is taken. Cramping and bleeding usually start 1-4 hours after misoprostol dosing, with the heaviest bleeding a couple of hours later. Bleeding normally slows within 24hrs. Those for whom it doesn't slow are the ones who end up in the ED. That can be a few days s/p mifepristone ingestion.
quote:
Had no idea that there was no test
M&M is detectable in serum.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:49 am to Night Vision
I sure hope the average person is realizing how easy any statistic can say whatever the presenter wants it to say.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:55 am to FooManChoo
quote:Except when trying to check this "study" (via the article link) for methodology and sound science, the following message comes up "Whoops! We seem to have hit a snag. Please try again later..."
Who is impartial? Everyone has biases. That’s why studies like these are documented and can be reviewed to determine if they pass muster scientifically.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:59 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Sounds like a problem with the article.
Except when trying to check this "study" (via the article link) for methodology and sound science, the following message comes up "Whoops! We seem to have hit a snag. Please try again later..."
I found this with a simple google search.
ETA: looks like the study was retracted for methodology and bias concerns, assuming it is the same one from the OP article.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 8:04 am
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:59 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
do you apply that same logic to you 'news sources' ???
Yes. But this is aimed more at scientific studies like the ones bought and paid for by big pharma or back in the day when the tobacco industry sponsored so-called studies.
It's pretty wise too pay some attention to who the messenger is and not just the message.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:43 am to FooManChoo
Translation:
Progs don't like the results.
Progs don't like the results.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:23 am to NC_Tigah
No immediate test. Both drugs leave your system pretty fast. One of them within a day.
How will they test for a drug that isn't in their system by the time they get to the hospital
How will they test for a drug that isn't in their system by the time they get to the hospital
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:23 am to FooManChoo
quote:Thanks for posting. Their conclusions did not seem clearly founded in the article description, which is why I checked for the study itself.
found this with a simple google search.
ETA: looks like the study was retracted for methodology and bias concerns, assuming it is the same one from the OP article.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News