As Congress gets close to coming back to do pretty much nothing but fear monger

I got to thinking... how can libs be so determined to pass red flag legislation but be completely against stop and frisk?

Stop and frisk is proven to work. It gets illegal guns off the street. And crime rates dropped where it was implemented.

But you hear liberals say it’s against the 4th amendment.. but their favorite weapon, the courts, say otherwise:

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

So since red flag laws are being heavily pushed libs..... why not stop and frisk? It gets illegal guns off the street. That’s the goal right? You are not being selective on who should get certain rights while others do not are you?