re: Arrests in Georgia on the 17th?

quote:

---

You suggested that whatever is in this report will have no bearing on ongoing domestic investigations. I called you out on it because that it blatantly stupid. it is everything to do with the ongoing investigation in Georgia and that is painfully obvious.

---

re-read what I said:

quote:

---

And if all the report does is reference foreign interference and it has no impact on the domestic investigations, you'll admit how wrong you were?

---

quote:

---

He'll engage in the kernel of truth fallacy and expand the truth (foreign interference unrelated to the domestic-based CTs) with dishonesty (likely trying to tie the foreign interference into the domestic-based CTs without any actual evidence) and then claim the CT was always right.

---

The question is what happens if the facts Trump discusses (not his puffery, the facts) are only about foreign interference with no overlap with the domestic-related CTs.

I can't make this more clear.

But I can tell by your reaction, you won't be happy if that's all that happens. That's why I'm asking the questions now, to avoid another "bio lab" scenario where you pull the rug and engage in the kernel of truth fallacy.

Biolab : Foreign Interference :: Bio Weapons Program : Domestic-based election interference.

quote:

---

Imagine Obama declaring an emergency over elections. This board would go bananas.

---

Imagine having the ability to believe Biden got 81,000,000 plus votes.

quote:

---

So let's try to stick to the subject, ok?

---

I am. You're the one avoiding this and mischaracterizing what I'm saying

quote:

---

The question is what happens if the facts Trump discusses (not his puffery, the facts) are only about foreign interference with no overlap with the domestic-related CTs.

---

To use the Ukraine example, what if Trump only discusses "bio labs" and not "bio weapons programs"? It will specifically not mean anything about "bio weapons"

Same with this scenario.

Trump discussing foreign interference with no overlap to the domestic conspiracy theories will in no way support any of those unrelated domestic conspiracy theories, agreed?

Update: no, he won't. Because he is a fricking coward. He asks people to post predictions constantly but won't do so himself. He will try to assign people predictions, imply that those won't happen (even if they haven't made them) and then refuse to actually stand on business himself.

An intellectual coward.

quote:

---

I think that's the most likely scenario

---

Oh, so after spending pages and pages of time sneering and laughing at people who seem to feel differently, you're too much of a pussy to put yourself out there without qualifying it as what you find "likely".

If you granted other people the same courtesy you afford yourself, you wouldn't act like an a-hole to people.

You want people to make bold predictions, and then when put to the test you hedge your own words like a coward. And all to justify you running around continuing to act like a fricking douchebag to other people whose apparent crime in all of this is hoping for justice to be served.

This is why everyone seems to hate you.

quote:

---

Oh, so after spending pages and pages of time sneering and laughing at people who seem to feel differently, you're too much of a pussy to put yourself out there without qualifying it as what you find "likely".

---

Is English your second language?

quote:

---

If you granted other people the same courtesy you afford yourself, you wouldn't act like an a-hole to people.

---

I do. Nobody has asked me a similar conditional question.

Your attempt was nothing like my questions.

quote:

---

You want people to make bold predictions, and then when put to the test you hedge your own words like a coward. And all to justify you running around continuing to act like a fricking douchebag to other people whose apparent crime in all of this is hoping for justice to be served.

---

I covered this

quote:

---

Whether or not that scenario is what happens Thursday isn't relevant to my question. You seem to have a problem understanding the simple concept of the conditional.

I'm discussing only one potential scenario. You seem to be pre-supposing something that hasn't happened yet (that the domestic-related stuff will be part of it) and malfunctioning imagining a scenario where this doesn't happen. I have specifically stated my reasons (even used a recent allegory to help you understand) why I'm discussing this one potential scenario.

---

Try reading the whole post and comprehending it before you respond.

quote:

---

We have evidence that election machines are manipulated in Louisiana also, but the AG won't investigate. A white hat hacker was able to get into the SOS computers in seconds.

---

According to SFP this is all from a couple of Iranian nationals and has no impact on ongoing investigations.

quote:

---

BoarEd

---

It's best not to engage trolls...ignore.

LINK

3 minutes to help

Officials are not following the law... which is not surprising to anyone paying attention.

Run the arrests tonite before they can flee to Iran