- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Arizona Senate releases more records of 2020 election review
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:14 am
PHOENIX (AP) — Lawyers representing the Republican-controlled Arizona Senate in a review of 2020 election results in the state's most populous county released a slew of communications between GOP lawmakers, their audit liasions and others under a court order obtained by a watchdog group that is fighting for transparency in the election recount.
Among the communications were text messages from a top campaign official of former President Donald Trump to Senate liaison Randy Pullen asking where to send $175,000 to help pay for the partisan recount. Former Trump campaign chief operating officer and ex-Arizona state Treasurer Jeff DeWit also asked Pullen if another group raising funds for the audit was legitimate, saying “Trump asking.”
The Senate records were not complete. Senate attorney Kory Langhofer told a judge Wednesday that it withheld nearly 3,000 records because they contained legislative or attorney-client communications he says are privileged.
One notable exchange was between Fann and well-respected Arizona GOP political consultant Chuck Coughlin, who told her the partisan nature of the audit caused public polling to show that there would be little confidence in the results.
"Start over, call the current audit professionally compromised," Coughlin wrote. “Lay that on the contractors -- which is true -- and the governor, you and the (House) Speaker find a way to establish a professional path toward rebuilding trust in AZ's election system.”
LINK
AP biased as per usual
Among the communications were text messages from a top campaign official of former President Donald Trump to Senate liaison Randy Pullen asking where to send $175,000 to help pay for the partisan recount. Former Trump campaign chief operating officer and ex-Arizona state Treasurer Jeff DeWit also asked Pullen if another group raising funds for the audit was legitimate, saying “Trump asking.”
The Senate records were not complete. Senate attorney Kory Langhofer told a judge Wednesday that it withheld nearly 3,000 records because they contained legislative or attorney-client communications he says are privileged.
One notable exchange was between Fann and well-respected Arizona GOP political consultant Chuck Coughlin, who told her the partisan nature of the audit caused public polling to show that there would be little confidence in the results.
"Start over, call the current audit professionally compromised," Coughlin wrote. “Lay that on the contractors -- which is true -- and the governor, you and the (House) Speaker find a way to establish a professional path toward rebuilding trust in AZ's election system.”
LINK
AP biased as per usual
4
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:17 am to idlewatcher
I want to party with the realtor lady who thought BLM and ANTIFA were going to storm the city.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:18 am to idlewatcher
quote:
to help pay for the partisan recount.
ISWYDT, AP...
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:25 am to VoxDawg
It's just a fact that only the republicans wanted this and not even all of them. That's as partisan as you get.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:30 am to oklahogjr
quote:
It's just a fact that only the patriots wanted this and all of them. The compromised establishment went Reeee, Reeee, Reeee all the way home. That's as patriotic as you get.
FIFY
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:34 am to oklahogjr
Election integrity SHOULD be the biggest no-brainer in the history of our republic, but sadly, only a vocal portion of one of our two political parties seems to be interested in ensuring that there's no frickery going on.
Why is that?
Why is that?
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:35 am to oklahogjr
So we should only do things if both sides are in agreement? Is that how politics works now?
It's why there are two parties. One party is supposed to keep the other in check. Key phrase is "supposed to" and for the most part, I don't think it's working anymore
It's why there are two parties. One party is supposed to keep the other in check. Key phrase is "supposed to" and for the most part, I don't think it's working anymore
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:47 am to oklahogjr
Oklahoma Girl, PLEASE shut your Commie mouth while the men are talking.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:49 am to idlewatcher
It is funny how 1+1 = well it depends on who is counting and if they have experience counting that to the leftists of the world.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:52 am to oklahogjr
quote:
It's just a fact that only the republicans wanted this
Tactful admission of fear.
If I’m a democrat, I want all the audits so I can sit back and watch the republicans spend money for no good reason.
Unless of course, there is something to be found. Then I’m against audits.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 10:54 am to oklahogjr
So if one party (Republicans) holds an audit to look into a multitude of voting improprieties committed by the other party (Democrats) that's pretty much the way this works, right? But to your point, shouldn't YOU be supportive of an audit that you apparently feel certain will support the final voting tallies and Perve Joe? C'mon man! This is your chance to rub Republicans noses in it! Back the audit...back the audit... back the audit!!!
Posted on 9/3/21 at 12:21 pm to GallatinTiger
Why isn't every election audited? Like, that should be a no brainer. Not a recount, but a complete forensic audit, every time. The fact that it isn't done is because we live in clown world and both parties are cheating in specific districts that they've both agreed (usually) would go one way or the other.
If the democrats are worried about the integrity of the audit, then the dumbf*cks should have participated in the process. But, nay nay, let the Republicans do what should be done and then try to hammer them as partisan, cause what's the right thing when you got politickin' to do?
For the record, I'm not conservative, I don't like Republican politics.
If the democrats are worried about the integrity of the audit, then the dumbf*cks should have participated in the process. But, nay nay, let the Republicans do what should be done and then try to hammer them as partisan, cause what's the right thing when you got politickin' to do?
For the record, I'm not conservative, I don't like Republican politics.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 12:59 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
It's just a fact that only the republicans wanted this and not even all of them. That's as partisan as you get.
So it's cool if we cheat, win then when your ilk comes bitching about it we can just say "muh partisan because we didn't want it!"
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:19 pm to fjlee90
quote:
Tactful admission of fear.
Yes I'm do scared i show up to every thread on voter fraud and state the truth. Shaking....for all this imsginery evidence they'll produce.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:20 pm to blackinthesaddle
quote:
Why isn't every election audited
Well using this audit as an example it's going to cost 2.8million for the state to replace the Maricopa county machines that had to be decertified due to improper access control by audit teams.
That's on top of millions in audit expense ,and other miscellaneous security risks the audit has not found but caused.
Shared access credentials is ridiculous for this. No auditor that's worth their salt would allow that on their team as it's a core piece of what you're auditing.....
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:25 pm to oklahogjr
quote:not a shred is imaginary ya POS
Shaking....for all this imsginery evidence they'll produce.
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:29 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
not a shred is imaginary ya POS
This is only technically true because there is no real evidence that means anything anymore. It's all debunked st this point or not even actual evidence it turns out
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:39 pm to oklahogjr
Debonked! Not real!
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:40 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
oklahogjr
quote:
It's all debunked st this point or not even actual evidence it turns out
Posted on 9/3/21 at 1:41 pm to Jbird
Pretty much. It's really a sad attempt and futile misunderstanding how the election systems and processes function.....
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News