
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Day, Another Massive Foreign Investment Thanks to Tariffs - South Korea
Posted on 10/1/26 at 9:56 am to SDVTiger
Posted on 10/1/26 at 9:56 am to SDVTiger
quote:
It falls under postive news. If this was any Prez it should be celebrated
No...it's neither positive nor negative because nothing has been achieved. Nothing is a done deal. There isn't any deal, hence by definition, it cannot be positive news.
quote:
But you tds riddled clowns are miserable and cant ever be happy
Some of you Einsteins really believe women are simply flattered when you prematurely ejaculate.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 9:57 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Yes retard math
I'm completely unsurprised that you think math is retarded.
Like handing a chimp a laptop.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 9:59 am to SDVTiger
quote:
They will never answer this
I'll be as specific about it as anybody who acknowledges that when the price of gas goes up, so does pretty much everything else.
For the same reason.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 9:59 am to Ten Bears
quote:
No...it's neither positive nor negative because nothing has been achieved. Nothing is a done deal. There isn't any deal, hence by definition, it cannot be positive news.
There is iron in the words of Ten Bears, for all Comanche to see.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:06 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
And it wouldn't matter if we made them all here...they would still be more expensive (which is why they were being made in China in the first place) and cause costs to rise
Meh, I would not mind the extra cost of domestic goods. Seems that when we did produce things domestically, they were more expensive but total cost was cheaper due to longer life of the product.
Would that hold true today? I don't know.
As far as tariffs, everything you said is true. This cannot be debated. Still, I prefer a usage tax over an income tax. I do not support both at the same time and we both know that imcome tax is going nowhere.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:07 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Still no answer
That's correct, I have no answer for why you are so fricking stupid. Drank Drano when you were a child? Head injury? I have no clue.
The other questions I have answered.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:16 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
I have no answer
I know you dont. Cause if you tried to answer it would make you look like more of a clown than usual
Rogerthecucker had to log off out of embarrassement after he attempted to
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:23 am to Powerman
quote:
Yeah...that's a bit misleading to say the least
You couldn’t comprehend that that statement means the Koreans are paying to build the plants? Are you high? Your take is very very dumb. Even for you.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:23 am to BeeFense5
quote:
It’s a BoarED thread. Misinformation, half truths and conspiracies only.
You couldn’t comprehend that the statement meant the Koreans were paying to build the plants? That’s a really dumb take. Even for you.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:26 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
you hate this increase in private sector jobs and cutting of government jobs huh?
He is a DSA guy. Of course he hates this.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:30 am to dgnx6
quote:
No it's not. They are literally building new assets instead of the taxpayer. This is not selling assets. It's building critical infrastructure without financing it through federal debt.
The poster you are referring to is an absolute moron. He doesn’t realize his argument in this thread is diametrically opposed to his disingenuous I want less government debt schtick. His only real principle is OMB. He isn’t smart or special. Just another reactionary.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:37 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
The exact amount of all the money that has been collected in tariffs so far divided by around 340 million. I don't know what that running total is, but that's your answer.
Laughably wrong. There are many industries where the companies are eating the tariff expenses.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:44 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Laughably wrong.
Of course he is. Consider the source.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:48 am to BoarEd
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:49 am to Ten Bears
quote:
Some of you Einsteins really believe women are simply flattered when you prematurely ejaculate.
This is like a repeat of the Greenland deal that just happened like a week ago. When it was announced they had reached a deal and was discussed here these same frickin retards were saying this same shite.
"Nothing is signed yet! Hurr Durr!"
And then it was signed and they changed their tune to something like, "but it's not as good as you think it is! Hurr Durr!"
Like children arguing on the playground over whose daddy could whip the other daddy.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 10:50 am
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:50 am to Kjnstkmn
I saw this last night and considered either starting a new thread for it or putting it in this thread, but I didn't want to overwhelm the retards. They're already riled up enough.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:51 am to 3down10
quote:
This is not an investment, this is America selling out to foreign nations.
If China announced they were building a bunch of rental property in the USA, I wonder if they'd get a warm reception.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:52 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
If China announced they were building a bunch of rental property in the USA, I wonder if they'd get a warm reception
This already happens.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 10:53 am to BoarEd
quote:
This already happens.
Exactly

Popular
Back to top


2






