Started By
Message

re: Another article about “the Boy Crisis” that gives a different perspective

Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:35 pm to
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84061 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

These women will never be settling for anything less than the absolute best they can get which is more likely to be a divorced rich guy than some average joe who is a great person and been solid/dependable his whole life.

Problem is, "those" women are an exceptionally small number of women. They just get discussed more, and their stories can go viral

Men will try to punch out of their weight class many times, as well. When the women aren't interested, men attribute blame to the woman, rather than eat the fact they aren't in the right mating class.

Men do this because we are ego driven, because men's biological role requires us to have inflated egos. Women have been insulated from this, largely, until social media came along. Now they got horny dudes all over the world glowing these 7's up to thinking they are 10's

This usually sorts itself out, provided the girl hasn't blown out her vagina to double digit body counts.

But male 7's have glazed themselves to 10's since the day we developed opposable thumbs. It sometimes sorts itself out, but often leads to men bitching that the 9 that let him frick her, left him for another 9.

*Now in my rating system, it is important to note, they are gender distinct

Men almost exclusively rate women on attractiveness and sexual characteristics. ..which is a biological imperative, ladies, not men being "pigs".

A man can't change what he finds sexually appealing any more than he can change his DNA.

Most women rate on attractiveness, security (physical and financial), and stability (steady and reliable). . .and the levels of the three vary with each woman.

And remember, outlier whores don't change the rules. Just don't date whores. High body counts are an excellent predictor of infidelity, and it has been proven time and again. There was a study a while back that said, iirc, a woman that has had more than 4 partners before marriage are twice as likely to cheat as those with four or less.

I hope this post makes sense, I feel like I just vomited random information
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 10:39 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84061 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:46 pm to
My junk food videos on Youtube are the women who reconnect with an old crush on social media.

The crush glazes the chick

She ends up leaving her husband and kids for the crush

He smashes and ghosts her, because he just wanted that arse.

She tries to go back to the husband and he is either with someone else, or she broke his heart so completely he is done with her

She makes crying videos talking about how unfair it all is, and I laaaaaaugh. . .the videos are more fun when they don't block comments.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
25006 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

Women couldn't even open their own bank accounts until the 1970s.


geez, I need to alert my grandmother born in 1924 that the bank account she had before marrying my grandfather isn’t real.


I’ll need a shovel but you’ve convinced me
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84061 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Women couldn't even open their own bank accounts until the 1970s.
Oh, sweetie, you need to be damn careful where you get you history from. Leftist political websites are unlikely to provide accurate information

This factoid is a fine example.

1862 is when the first law allowing a woman to open a bank account, regardless of her marital status.

You were only off by 108 years

politically oriented websites distort facts for impact and clicks, They were probably saying women were still DENIED accounts. . .in which they just needed to find a single bank, somewhere that refused to serve women
Posted by Neutral Underground
Member since Mar 2024
3422 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Masculinity doesn't allow friendships


That is a bunch of BS. Joining sport teams, the military, the Boy Scouts all leads to life long friendships. They are all masculine activities. Explains why the Left wants to destroy all of these activities.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84061 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:48 am to
I meet up with guys from my last boat all the time. Flew up to Tennessee for the funeral of my old LPO a few years ago. Me and my shipmates joked and carried on like we were 20, and no time had passed.

Again, the article is written by someone viewing male friendships through a female lens. . .with no idea how male friendships are created, maintained, nor nurtured.
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 10:56 am
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 11Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram