Started By
Message

re: Another article about “the Boy Crisis” that gives a different perspective

Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7972 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

I’m not talking about managers. I mean the general public. I have a client facing role.


Serious question though, would any in charge and responsible male actually work in social services?

It just seems like it would draw very... passive... males... very... lazy males.

There may be some self selection bias going on where they just really are the worst.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61470 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Serious question though, would any in charge and responsible male actually work in social services?

It just seems like it would draw very... passive... males... very... lazy males.


One of my coworkers is a retired Marine. The rest are women. I really like the Marine fwiw.

But my little alcove is housed within a larger much more masculine entity.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7972 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

But my little alcove is housed within a larger much more masculine entity.

But that larger entity is still full of... very beta males.

I mean they aren't inventing anything, they aren't building anything, they aren't selling anything.

Competition isn't really a social services thing.

You probably get drastically more passive and lazy males than other fields.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84063 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

ou don't see anything potentially concerning about someone saying "you have zero idea about male relationships because you are a woman"
Because you confirm it with the article YOU posted

quote:

while also saying "I know all about female relationships because I am a man"?

Link, please.

quote:

Nothing about that strikes you as problematic or questionable?
Well. . .you made half of it up, so that's a bit questionable.

You going to strawman every post I make, or just the last few.

This fricking chick here. . .
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84063 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

erious question though, would any in charge and responsible male actually work in social services?

It just seems like it would draw very... passive... males... very... lazy males.

Social work, which is where virtually all therapy prescriptions ACTUALLY originate is overwhelmingly female. Iirc, 80% of the men in social work are gay. My baby sister got her masters in social work.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61470 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

You probably get drastically more passive and lazy males than other fields.


Yeah that probably tracks.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61470 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:20 pm to
I’m not a social worker. But I work in an office with social workers.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84063 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:25 pm to
I grew up in foster care, was constantly surrounded by and interacting with Social workers from 8-16 until my foster parents took me in. Mother is a Psychologist, baby sister is a social worker, I am was a lowly educator that worked with dozens of non-profit drop out prevention programs filled with social workers. Wall to wall women.

Was great before I got married.

There is only one profession with more daddy issues than Social Worker. And in that one, poles and pasties are involved
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 6:27 pm
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61470 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

from 8-16 until my foster parents took me in.


In a super weird coincidence, my son’s friend came over the other day. His mom came inside when she dropped him off and told me a story involving her grandfather. I couldn’t believe she still had a living grandparent. She told me she was adopted from foster care at 16, too. Her mom is only 13 years older than her. Really cool lady.

Do you still teach?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84063 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:36 pm to
Quit a couple years back, 22 years teaching. Work in tech now.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
5882 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

. Who is guiding and training women to do these things


Women
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65902 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

Women are training their teenage daughters and other young women to sleep around and avoid committed relationships? This is your claim?


Yes.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 7:30 pm
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7972 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Quit a couple years back, 22 years teaching. Work in tech now.

Have you noticed a difference in males between the two fields?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19586 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

How do you know?


I live with one.


quote:

How do you know?



27 years in the military seeing how men vs women command similar units.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84063 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Have you noticed a difference in males between the two fields?
In my experience, they are basically the same. Most male teachers I dealt with are straight, many coach some bullshite, anti-woke (privately), about 50/50 Dem/GOP, etc.

The women teachers are generally a caricature of your ultra woke, progressive meme. If you are talking politics with anyone of the men, the women will rush over to insert their bullshite and damn near demand you parrot that shite back at them.

Tell them to frick off, and you are likely to have to talk with an administrator, as the women will call you all the -ists and -phobes, until they find the one that will get you called to the office.

Tech is a bunch of people that want to work without micromanagement. Loner libertarian types, mostly.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7972 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Tech is a bunch of people that want to work without micromanagement. Loner libertarian types, mostly.


I'd agree on that.

Informative write up.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
Didn’t read, downvoted.
read this, upvoted.


Read this, upvoted, upvoted his post, downvoted OP
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8079 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

Men and boys aren’t maintaining close friendships because


They closed down all the damn taverns on our way home from work.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55629 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

That’s what I took away from the article, as in, that’s what I understood the claim made by the article to be

And you were correct that the article claimed that. The article was mostly incorrect, though. Most of us don’t need our “anxieties calmed” or “our egos stroked”. Now if they talked about “our balls fondled and our cocks sucked” they could have roped in most of us.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64372 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

But this mid-tier group of women that actually wants partners is totally fricked. Because they're just attractive enough when they're 25 to screw top tier guys and it makes them think that's what they're going to land. They're going to look up in there late 30s like the slow person in a game of musical chairs. Then they might start casting their eyes towards men more in their range but then they have a new problem. A lot of those men will have built a decent careers and have access to slightly better women than they had when they were 25. Not to mention they're going to have a healthy frick you attitude towards these women who suddenly figured out they aren't tens




Im not sure these women will ever settle as there is a pretty noticeable amount of very good looking women who are also "career" types that seemingly design their entire lives around career-ism and this sort of urban lifestyle "fun" or whatever you want to call it. They have nice things, clothes, cars, maybe even a nice condo/loft, great jobs, great connections, but they do not date much at all and talk about how "busy" they are. Also very well travelled, probably dated some well-off guy here or there but was always mostly into her own achievement.

These women will never be settling for anything less than the absolute best they can get which is more likely to be a divorced rich guy than some average joe who is a great person and been solid/dependable his whole life.


A lot of people don't talk about this...but the unmarried people are still going to be options for the married when the married start to weaken a bit...one of the good things about MOST being married is everyone is kind of locked into their situation and less likely to step out.

If there are plenty of decent looking 30-40s women/men out there, thats tons of options for potential divorcees to consider when mulling a possible divorce. In another era they don't have those options.

Either way, I think most of these women still mostly get more than they probably deserve because thats generally been their life themes....always getting the boost from the boomer boss, a nice interviewer than thinks shes attractive....she got good grades, did everything by the textbook AND shes good looking? She can be as entitled as she wants and she still fall into a good spot.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 9:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram