- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Air Force: Nothing improper with Airmen's Pro-Trump merchandise at Ramstein
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:36 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:36 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Where do you GET this bullshite. I did not ask anyone to disprove a hypothetical. I asked what information other posters may have had regarding the source of the red gimme caps.
Relevance to your request that posters disprove your hypothetical?
The hypotheticals were just a discussion regarding the potential results of different potential factual scenarios.
You know all this. For some odd reason, you just seem to enjoy acting like an arse today.
1
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:37 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
continuing to attack me for several pages.
Probably because they just don't like you. I can't confirm that. Just offering a possibility. I'm not judging by the way, just offering unbiased suggestion.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:37 pm to Jbird
Hank is a family law attorney. Likely a very good one. Unfortunately, Hank thinks that makes him intellectually superior to everyone else. He got caught making a dumb remark and instead of admitting it, he is doubling down.
It’s how I know he is likely a good litigator. That strategy has won a lot of cases. Unfortunately, family law is an extremely limited field of law. It doesn’t equate to an expertise in other fields...or even in common sense.
Hank (as am I) is very arrogant and thinks his legal expertise means something. It doesn’t.
It’s how I know he is likely a good litigator. That strategy has won a lot of cases. Unfortunately, family law is an extremely limited field of law. It doesn’t equate to an expertise in other fields...or even in common sense.
Hank (as am I) is very arrogant and thinks his legal expertise means something. It doesn’t.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:38 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Do you think that "suspicion" is greater or less than "preponderance?"quote:Yes...and the difference was cavernous, as I apologized for. Why does that matter, though? I thought we were going by your proponderance definition.
Yes. And one definition implied a higher level of certainty than the other. Just as I explained.
Do you think that "believe" is greater or less than a "preponderance?"
This is tiresome, and I am going to bed. Perhaps you can find someone else to argue with for no reason.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:41 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Where do you GET this bullshite. I did not ask anyone to disprove a hypothetical. I asked what information other posters may have had regarding the source of the red gimme caps.
And where do you expect this information to come from? You posted a hypothetical. One you suspect (not to be confused with believe) to be the case. You then ask posters to present evidence to the contrary. That is asking them to post evidence to disprove a negative.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:43 pm to AggieHank86
Takes two to argue Hank. U been up in this bitch doubling down all day counselor.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Do you think that "suspicion" is greater or less than "preponderance?" Do you think that "believe" is greater or less than a "preponderance?"
No idea. they are your made up definitions. I was using the standard English definitions, since you stated
quote:
For those of you that are less than fluent in English
I have accepted your made up proponderance standard and reminded you that the difference between meeting the standard and not is less than .00000000000001 percent.
I’m sorry this is tiresome for you, however, if you are going to insult the board, you should probably use precise language.
quote:
Perhaps you can find someone else to argue with for no reason.
oh my. I will add “lack of self awareness” to your ever growing list of qualities. This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Here's a CRAZY thought ... maybe someone had read news reports that I had not read? Maybe someone (like CBA) had life experiences that I did not share.quote:And where do you expect this information to come from?
Where do you GET this bullshite. I did not ask anyone to disprove a hypothetical. I asked what information other posters may have had regarding the source of the red gimme caps.
I know more than most, but I damned sure do not know everything. Crazy, right?
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:45 pm to AggieHank86
Not conceited are we? LoL
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:46 pm to Jbird
quote:
Takes two to argue Hank. U been up in this bitch doubling down all day counselor.
He's been drunk and lonely this week. He finally lost it today. Well, he loses it everyday because I think he is always lonely and sad.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:46 pm to Jbird
quote:Confident.
Not conceited are we? LoL
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:47 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Here's a CRAZY thought ... maybe someone had read news reports that I had not read? Maybe someone (like CBA) had life experiences that I did not share.
So you thought there would be a news report refuting something you made up in your head? Look, I know people in our profession can be narcissistic, but that is kind of crazy.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:47 pm to AggieHank86
I know more than most is a tad over confident. Especially considering your vast knowledge of the UCMJ was a few days in school.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I am fairly confident that I was not the only person who suspected that Trump brought the hats. Didn't someone ask that very question of SHS? Sure, she denied it, but I don't recall believing anything out of the mouth of any Presidential press secretary in my lifetime.
So you thought there would be a news report refuting something you made up in your head?
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am fairly confident that I was not the only person who suspected that Trump brought the hats. Didn't someone ask that very question of SHS? Sure, she denied it, but I don't recall believing anything out of the mouth of any Presidential press secretary in my lifetime.
Believing or suspecting? This is important.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:50 pm to AggieHank86
So you want to believe they were brought in.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:50 pm to Jbird
quote:
So you want to believe they were brought in.
Bingo. And it is this boards job to disprove his want (or suspicion or belief).
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:51 pm to BBONDS25
He just doesn't have the balls to make the out right assertion.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:52 pm to Jbird
quote:For the 1500th time, my suspicions had NOTHING to do with the UCMJ. Maybe some reporters were beating that drum, but it is YOU lot who are obsessing over the UCMJ.
I know more than most is a tad over confident. Especially considering your vast knowledge of the UCMJ was a few days in school.
My question related to Trump (not the airmen) and the potential misuse of governmental resources and potential violations of campaign laws/regs.
For the 1400th time, CBA's analysis largely allayed those concerns.
Posted on 12/28/18 at 9:53 pm to AggieHank86
So it boils down to did he or didn't he smuggle maga hats into Germany. Lay out the facts that lead you to believe he did.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News