- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Activist Judge overturns unanimous jury verdict in a $7.2M Medicaid fraud case…
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:59 am to deltaland
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:59 am to deltaland
quote:Sweet Baby Jesus, save us. These people are allowed to vote.
Since when can a judge overturn a jury’s verdict? They have discretion on sentencing within the constraints of the law broken but I’ve never heard a judge overruling a verdict
This post was edited on 11/26/25 at 5:01 am
0
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:05 am to Placekicker
The judiciary is full of members of the Cabal. Who knew.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:09 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In a nutshell, the judge ruled that there WAS fraud, but that the fraud was committed by the defendant's brother, rather than the defendant.
I get that but if your brother robs a bank and gives you half of the money, will the police let you keep the money or does that become a civil case in trying to reclaim the money?
Also as the owner of the business, don’t you have a fiduciary and legal responsibility of your employees work especially when it comes to government dollars?
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:17 am to Tarps99
quote:was this a civil case?
if your brother robs a bank and gives you half of the money, will the police let you keep the money or does that become a civil case in trying to reclaim the money?
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:34 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
was this a civil case?
Based on the previous posts it was a criminal case. The state charged the business owner involved instead of his brother who committed the fraud and was an enriching endeavor for both.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 7:10 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In a nutshell, the judge ruled that there WAS fraud, but that the fraud was committed by the defendant's brother, rather than the defendant.
The jury disagreed. Hence the reason he was convicted of aiding and abetting fraud.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News