A point on the hypocrisy of the left on Trumps travel ban and what it means

for the bigger picture.

----------

Where was the outrage when the refugee crisis was being created?

In 2011 the Obama administration toppled the Libyan government to prevent the creation of a gold backed currency aimed at becoming the new standard currency for middle east oil trading.

The CIA was sent in to back rebel groups who ended up having direct ties to Al-Queda, and then we used air-strikes to finish the job.

Prior to this intervention Libya had one of the highest standards of living in Africa. Even free health care, among many other provided benefits.



Today it's a lawless state overrun by violence -- which is obviously why the people are leaving.

In 2012 we began providing weapons and training to rebel groups in Syria to overthrow Assad -- with full knowledge that these weapons were going to anti-American groups.

There was also Yemin, where Obama supported the Saudi bombing campaign for over a year until we started doing it directly ourselves.

In 2016 the US dropped near 30,000 bombs in the countries that now providing the world with a refugee crisis.

If you take this info just on the level of "LOL at liberals, you hypocritical fricks", then you're missing the bigger picture, or at least you're failing to ask bigger questions and likely not re-shaping your view of America appropriately.

We do overthrow governments for our own purpose. We do falsely frame other leaders to justify our behaviors. We have willingly funded, armed, and trained terrorist groups in the middle east. And so on.

Were these decisions really what Obama wanted? Or were they dictated by the banking cartel? Are these types of actions really just built-into the job of the presidency? Libya starting a gold backed oil trading currency would be devastating to the western banking block.

Is there an agenda to disrupt culture around the world? Taking out strong cultural ties in places like Germany, the American South, and so on in an effort to make a global authoritarian government more palatable?

How easily does the media control both sides to get large groups of people to stick on other narratives about all of this instead of the narrative presented here?