Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

A must read 'We don't need less traditional masculinity, we need more'

Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:20 pm
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
14099 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:20 pm
In the Federalist.

LINK

Must read entire well-written article.

A couple of excellent excerpts:

'A “real man” was a man who used his strength to defend and cherish his family, community, and nation. The purpose of his sexual vitality was to bear children and connect with his wife, and his emotional quietude was to endure the hardships of caring for those under his charge without complaint. By controlling his emotions instead of spilling them for the world to see, those under his care were free to express theirs and find strength in him.'

'Masculinity is at its best when a man is married, but it takes two. How can a man be a man if women don’t want him to be a man? This is the conundrum and the deleterious consequence of modern feminism and its war against masculinity—and marriage.

Men who want to be men need women who want the same. The loss of marriage as the sacred realm of both masculine and feminine expression has created a social vacuum that has been filled with deviance and degradation.

The ills the APA cites are not caused by traditional masculinity, but by its loss. We have abandoned, devalued, and disrespected the role and nature of true manhood, replacing it with a degraded representation of its former self. We have failed to nurture men and then blame men for their toxic masculinity—a masculinity made toxic only by its neglect and abandonment.'

Excellent!
Posted by jimdog
columbus, ga
Member since Dec 2012
6636 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:39 pm to
Bingo. But I've got a flash for you. Having four daughters I have met hundreds and hundreds of friends and college/work friends and associates. Most of whom are female. All as far as I can determine want a real man mate. Not some but all. Yes our family is upper middle class and 95% of these kids are middle class, 95% white and all college educated. They would never think of taking a guy like the left is trying to create for a mate. Friend, yes but not a husband.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39565 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

The ills the APA cites are not caused by traditional masculinity, but by its loss. We have abandoned, devalued, and disrespected the role and nature of true manhood, replacing it with a degraded representation of its former self. We have failed to nurture men and then blame men for their toxic masculinity—a masculinity made toxic only by its neglect and abandonment.'


Idiots. Do they really think they can change a million years of Genetic-programed behaviors by changing a prevailing Cultural moray? And when a/the Culture collapses...what behavior do they believe the Natural Default will be?

It's impossible to argue with stupid, misguided...or even morally-inspired (faith, Secular version) delusion. But it's not hard to fight it, at a given point in time. Which will surely come.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
14099 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:41 pm to
Absolutely! Guys with man-buns and yoga-looking pants are not husband material.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram