- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

A must read 'We don't need less traditional masculinity, we need more'
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:20 pm
In the Federalist.
LINK
Must read entire well-written article.
A couple of excellent excerpts:
'A “real man” was a man who used his strength to defend and cherish his family, community, and nation. The purpose of his sexual vitality was to bear children and connect with his wife, and his emotional quietude was to endure the hardships of caring for those under his charge without complaint. By controlling his emotions instead of spilling them for the world to see, those under his care were free to express theirs and find strength in him.'
'Masculinity is at its best when a man is married, but it takes two. How can a man be a man if women don’t want him to be a man? This is the conundrum and the deleterious consequence of modern feminism and its war against masculinity—and marriage.
Men who want to be men need women who want the same. The loss of marriage as the sacred realm of both masculine and feminine expression has created a social vacuum that has been filled with deviance and degradation.
The ills the APA cites are not caused by traditional masculinity, but by its loss. We have abandoned, devalued, and disrespected the role and nature of true manhood, replacing it with a degraded representation of its former self. We have failed to nurture men and then blame men for their toxic masculinity—a masculinity made toxic only by its neglect and abandonment.'
Excellent!
LINK
Must read entire well-written article.
A couple of excellent excerpts:
'A “real man” was a man who used his strength to defend and cherish his family, community, and nation. The purpose of his sexual vitality was to bear children and connect with his wife, and his emotional quietude was to endure the hardships of caring for those under his charge without complaint. By controlling his emotions instead of spilling them for the world to see, those under his care were free to express theirs and find strength in him.'
'Masculinity is at its best when a man is married, but it takes two. How can a man be a man if women don’t want him to be a man? This is the conundrum and the deleterious consequence of modern feminism and its war against masculinity—and marriage.
Men who want to be men need women who want the same. The loss of marriage as the sacred realm of both masculine and feminine expression has created a social vacuum that has been filled with deviance and degradation.
The ills the APA cites are not caused by traditional masculinity, but by its loss. We have abandoned, devalued, and disrespected the role and nature of true manhood, replacing it with a degraded representation of its former self. We have failed to nurture men and then blame men for their toxic masculinity—a masculinity made toxic only by its neglect and abandonment.'
Excellent!
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:39 pm to conservativewifeymom
Bingo. But I've got a flash for you. Having four daughters I have met hundreds and hundreds of friends and college/work friends and associates. Most of whom are female. All as far as I can determine want a real man mate. Not some but all. Yes our family is upper middle class and 95% of these kids are middle class, 95% white and all college educated. They would never think of taking a guy like the left is trying to create for a mate. Friend, yes but not a husband.
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:41 pm to conservativewifeymom
quote:
The ills the APA cites are not caused by traditional masculinity, but by its loss. We have abandoned, devalued, and disrespected the role and nature of true manhood, replacing it with a degraded representation of its former self. We have failed to nurture men and then blame men for their toxic masculinity—a masculinity made toxic only by its neglect and abandonment.'
Idiots. Do they really think they can change a million years of Genetic-programed behaviors by changing a prevailing Cultural moray? And when a/the Culture collapses...what behavior do they believe the Natural Default will be?
It's impossible to argue with stupid, misguided...or even morally-inspired (faith, Secular version) delusion. But it's not hard to fight it, at a given point in time. Which will surely come.
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:41 pm to jimdog
Absolutely! Guys with man-buns and yoga-looking pants are not husband material.
Popular
Back to top
2





