re: A Message from Kyle Rittenhouse...

quote:

---

suggest that you re-read the thread. Several posters were focused ENTIRELY upon the word "justification," and implied that no such concept is applicable.

---

No dumbass. Those posters were correctly pointing out that there is no such thing as justifiable murder, with the implication being the correct term is justifiable homicide, to again highlight the stupidity of your claiming rittenhouse committed “a murder”. You’ve been attempting to spin this into a fake argument about justification for multiple pages to distract from your original stupidity.

quote:

---

Those persons were/are incorrect.

---

As with literally everything else in this thread, those persons are completely correct and you’re completely wrong.

quote:

---

I suggest that perhaps you have not followed the discussion very closely over the past week.

---

I know that nothing from the past week has any bearing on the fact that you intentionally said rittenhouse committed “a murder” twice in an attempt to portray him in a negative manner. Just as you do with the mccloskeys when describing potential situations explaining how the gate to their community was damaged, as opposed to the mob of protestors that have proven multiple times to be destructive.

quote:

---

I started an entire THREAD asserting that advocates of the 2nd Amendment AND/OR opponents of BLM could not have HOPED for a better poster-boy than Kyle Rittenhouse. I outlined all the great things about the kid, and explained how fortunate those advocates ARE that it was KYLE and not some Proud Boy or skinhead who was involved in this shooting. I have said REPEATEDLY that I like what I see about the kid AND that I see zero chance he will be convicted on the felonies.

---

Given how little you’ve repeatedly demonstrated you understand about the law, this is quite possibly the most damning thing written to date about rittenhouse, from anywhere.

quote:

---

Why the HELL would I "try to portray (him) in a negative manner?"

---

You’re asking me to explain why you’re an unmitigated moron? I can’t do that definitively, but I guess I’ll start with you’re just that much of a hack. Or just a piece of shite like that.

quote:

---

Yes, I did, and you have STILL not explained your understanding of the distinction between "murder" and homicide."

---

Why would I waste time answering a question that was never asked of me you dumbass?

quote:

---

Let me help you out. "Murder" is a subset of "homicide." For most of our history, the criminal codes of the various States used the term "murder." Over time, those Codes have been amended to use the term "homicide."

---

A “lawyer” attempting to explain murder without including anything about malice aforethought.

quote:

---

Again, my use of the term "murder" was imprecise, and perhaps a bit dated.

---

Let’s go ahead and add “imprecise” to the list of words the shitty “lawyer” doesn’t know the meaning of.

Your use of the term murder was wrong, period and end of story.

quote:

---

You are an emotional child.

---

You’re a perfect representation of why “laypersons” hate lawyers.

There is stupid, and then there is Gtmodawg stupid.

Congratulations.

quote:

---

Say WHAT?

---

What words in that phrase don’t you know the meaning of dumbass?

quote:

---

You have STILL not explained your understanding of the distinction between "murder" and homicide."

---

You STILL have not pointed out where I was ever supposed to do that.

quote:

---

At this point, it should be easy, since I explained it for you several pages ago.

---

Besides the fact nobody would ever place any value on any legal explanation from you, your explanation didn’t include any distinction between the 2 terms beyond murder being a subset of homicide.

It’s not surprising that a shitty “lawyer” that is only capable of offering hypotheticals as proof of his claims wouldn’t know what it actually means to explain something. Let’s
add “explained” to the ever-growing list of words your dumbass doesn’t know the meaning of.

quote:

---

Any rational gun owner who knows they have a right to own a gun is disturbed by this kids idiotic actions..

---

I am disturbed that Rittenhouse didnt kill more of them.

In all seriousness, Rittenhouse should be a firearms instructor for the police.

Cop shoots Jacob Blake 7 times and doesnt kill him... Kyle shoots 3 times and kills 2 and DISARMED another.