A great critique of Obama-ism and those who defend it.

quote:

---

Collective punishment is the appropriate answer.

If there were any doubts the Obama Democrats cannot be trusted, look at their scurrilous campaigns. From coast to coast, their message is uniformly odious: Republicans are waging a “war on women” and they are racists.

That’s it. They can’t defend the legislation they passed, the economy they produced or the foreign policy they supported. Most don’t want to be seen with Obama, yet they take the money he raises and follow his lead in exploiting race and gender fault lines.

Scraping the bottom of the rancid barrel, they prove they will do anything to hold on to power. They cannot be allowed to succeed.

It is time for them to go.

---

Liberals have no message other than one of hatred and disdain.

quote:

---

Goodwin is not a Democrat.

---

From the article:

quote:

---

Normally, I am not a partisan advocate. I am a registered Democrat, though I vote as an independent.

---

quote:

---

How are blanket statements like that good for your argument? They're not.

---

It's a strong argument because it is blanketed in accuracy and truth.

As stated in the article, Dems have nothing new to offer. The same old playbook is being used: war on women, Repubs are racist, etc.

I love the way that the author of the article does what few writers have the courage to do and that is to lambast Obama's blaming of everybody else when things to wrong and calls Obama a narcissist.

Here's my fave quote from the article:

quote:

---

Obamaism, a quasi-socialist commitment to a more powerful government at home and an abdication of American leadership around the world, is being exposed as a historic calamity.

---

CALAMITY ! It's a beautiful word and a perfect word to describe Obama and his whole administration !!

Bravo, Goodwin !

quote:

---

The presidency is sinking, but we are expected to believe that only the president is blameless.

---

I could not resist posting a final great quote from the article !

That article was a vicious combination of lefts and rights, and a few uppercuts.

quote:

---

How are blanket statements like that good for your argument? They're not.

---

Sure, but when any statement made is construed as anti whatever, you learn to be generic. It's also true.

No it's not.