re: 911 in 5 Minutes

I find it to be a set of nearly unfathomable circumstances that couldn’t have happened without corruption

With that buckeye go eat a bag of dicks - you are not offering anything. Hell your answering everything I ask with a question even when I explicitly state I don’t have the answers.
I’m not positing any theory and I’m not asking rhetorical questions.
I have issues with the case presented by the government and MSM.

I’m asking for clarity.
You are being a dickhead liberal assuming my position and being automatically contrarian.

Gfy

Thanks for the cliffs man I have trouble with Hulu in Canada but I have it bookmarked so I can find a way to get it

quote:

---

I have done the work. I've chased down most of the tales you folks spin, and they end in the same places:
- speculation
- wild speculation
- agenda-driven, dubious sources
- outright lies
- misunderstanding of fire, civil engineering, aviation, etc.

---

You haven't though and I know this based on what you're saying.

I know this because I've been at your level. I know the scope you're assessing.

To put it as douchie as possible: you just don't know what you don't know. You're also likely un-learned on the many things that orbit this topic that aren't directly a part of the 9/11 event.

I'm not here to go into detailed and major debates on this. The burden is on me to present everything, which is more taxing than just dismissing everything with ease and no heavy lifting. It's also basically a foreign language because the reference points are completely different between you and I.

'Believing' in this stuff is perceived as an identity, same as being a republican or democrat or muslim or christian. People don't switch political or religious allegiance because of an online forum debate, they generally counter with the offsetting belief system of their own - which is the Hegelian Intellectual Trap.

People argue for/against all things instead of truly aiming to understand and grow knowledge. It's like a leprosy, once it's there it's really hard to get people out of that wavelength. It's a totally different dance in the mind and heart to seek truth and understanding instead of defending or pushing a position.

Thesis vs anti-thesis = tension between the two

For vs against kills thought.

Simone Weil, one of my very favorites, wrote this in the early 1940s. It is perfection.

“Nearly everywhere – often even when dealing with purely technical problems – instead of thinking, one merely takes sides: for or against. Such a choice replaces the activity of the mind. This is an intellectual leprosy; it originated in the political world and then spread through the land, contaminating all forms of thinking. This leprosy is killing us; it is doubtful whether it can be cured without first starting with the abolition of all political parties.”
Simone Weil, On the Abolition of All Political Parties

Remove your trigger-phrase from my post and respond, if you'd like.

It's irrelevant to the message in this series of posts.

I'm curious, why does this idea of a lost $2.3 trillion persist?

It seems ridiculously stupid. Essentially, many years of the military budget or a sum greater than the entire fed budget (2000) would have disappeared. For what? Was this paid to blow up the towers?

The truthers see our government as inherently evil. They also simultaneously do not see Islamfascist terror as evil. It’s an amazing worldview. But that’s the majority of them.

Did you ever use the phrase “free-fall speed” prior to 2001?

Are you a physicist or engineer?