re: 54% of the cell phones at Kamala's Nevada rally were also at her Arizona rally

quote:

---

Thanks for all the details. My knowledge was based on the fact that I was offered geofencing as part of a marketing package. It was very clear: "You will be able to text messages to these cell phone numbers that were present at an event likely to contain promising leads."

---

Heya BillMatt.
As others have pointed out, yes... It should be considered illegal for the harvesting.
I'd wish it illegal for the sale.
The reality tho, is that it's right there in the user agreement of Google and apple. That we allow them to use data from the device for advertising purposes.
Use of the device is what is legally known as Implied Consent by the user of the device. Whether the user is aware of the UA or not.
Computer companies are notorious for using implied consent, when squirming out of warranty work.
Game decks like Sony, have implied consent that the user agrees to allowing Sony to brick their game decks. Because it's written there, in the UA.

yea the guy that always claims to track everyone but never shows proof. trust him he also says hes a former spook! only real spooks say they used to be spooks!

quote:

---

And your point is? Are you trying to say no one is supporting Kamala because that is retarded. She has just as many ppl supporting her as Trump has. Yall need to open your eyes and understand how many idiots we have in this country who believe that Kamala is a better candidate than Trump.

---

Well her Hollywood team, script and production makes it seem like she’s popular and a decent candidate. So it makes people say oh yeah I’ll vote for her, all these people like her. But no one really likes her.

quote:

---

That kind of data is not very complex. It's actually quite simple. >30 years ago with a dial up modem and a slow computer downloading and comparing it would have been a serious choke job. Now, a good home PC and a fiber connection make those comparisons entirely possible and relatively fast. A few thousand comparisons of such simple data doesn't take all that much power. And I'm sure there is an app for that too.

---

I'm speaking specifically to this particular aspect of Seruga's claims

quote:

---

We own the digital ID of every mobile device/computer in the U.S. and have indexed and archived every IP address in the world.

---

And to this point, most mobile devices have dynamic IPs and he's made multiple claims in the past that he's tracking mobile devices specifically by IPs across different events.

Yes, an elastic search like Splunk or Graylog could easily handle sifting through the data generated by a few thousand IPs. But his tracking methodology doesn't really hold any water and his claims about what his infrastructure looks like and its capabilities are really boisterous and don't gel with the functionality limitations of known resources in the ballpark of what he's describing wrt worldwide IP information (like Shodan).

It's all really suspect, especially coupled his previous "predictions" and that his resume just looks like a lot of grifting.