- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:30 am to AGGIES
It doesn't matter. Viter registration and updated rolls are the foundation of the voting system. The bank vault of voting. If you don't reconcile the money in a bank vault, then the entire banks Financials are in peril and can never be trusted.
Try building a home on a faulty, out of code, never quality checked materials. You can keep the house as nice and clean as you want, it will crumble at some point.
There, now you know. The #s you asked for will be 0, once you have a base roll to audit off of.
Try building a home on a faulty, out of code, never quality checked materials. You can keep the house as nice and clean as you want, it will crumble at some point.
There, now you know. The #s you asked for will be 0, once you have a base roll to audit off of.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:37 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
You are assuming the R's remain in control. Not a given by any means.
Sitting Congress decides.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:44 am to AGGIES
quote:
What actually matters is how many of these registered voters have had votes cast after their death.
You’re a dumbass.
You can’t see a foot in front of your face even with a torch and reading glasses.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 11:49 am to loogaroo
Having them on the rolls is concerning enough, but we need to know how many of them cast a vote and how many times since their demise.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:36 pm to loogaroo
Well, from that article it sounds like a purge of deceased voters off the voter rolls happened… but there were 26,000 that PILF claimed should have also been removed.
It was a little light on details and somewhat unclear as to what PILF alleged.
Sounds like the lawsuit was to use 26,000 reported number to force open access that is not previously granted, and the judge ruled on that.
I didn’t see where 26,000 were added back.
But yeah, if any were added back, that would defy logic.
It was likely just an alleged remainder after the purge.
It was a little light on details and somewhat unclear as to what PILF alleged.
Sounds like the lawsuit was to use 26,000 reported number to force open access that is not previously granted, and the judge ruled on that.
I didn’t see where 26,000 were added back.
But yeah, if any were added back, that would defy logic.
It was likely just an alleged remainder after the purge.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:40 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Then you already know that I’ve supported purging voter rolls.
That is an entirely different scenario from granting open access to everything and causing confusion based on false claims.
How you cannot see that defies
logic as well.
That is an entirely different scenario from granting open access to everything and causing confusion based on false claims.
How you cannot see that defies
logic as well.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 12:46 pm to Rainier Fog
quote:
Luckily for you, Dim judges keep blocking any attempt at inspection of this. And it doesn’t matter what the percentage is, they fabricate enough votes AFTER Election Day to change the outcomes.
Imagine the backlash if the Biden admin demanded access to all of Ohio’s (pick a state) voter records to try to invalidate Republican votes.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:00 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Imagine the backlash if the Biden admin demanded access to all of Ohio’s (pick a state) voter records to try to invalidate Republican votes.
It’s supposed to be public.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:03 pm to the808bass
quote:well he is a lefty sooooo of course the below is the case and/or hes "playing dumb" knowing it benifits his wants
You’re a dumbass.
quote:
You can’t see a foot in front of your face even with a torch and reading glasses.
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:38 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Exhibit A of “Everything is a conspiracy when you don’t know how anything works.”
Exhibit A of total fricking retard who doesn't understand how mass mail in ballot harvesting voter fraud works. But sure, pal. You're the smart one.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 1:38 pm to doubleb
quote:
quote:
Explain how the dead register to vote in the first place.
I’d venture to say having dead people on the voter rolls is inevitable. It’s also inevitable that because of early voting dead people’s votes are counted.
People die immediately before Election Day.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 2:03 pm to loogaroo
At this point I have no confidence whatsoever in the integrity of our elections here in the USA. None.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:19 pm to doubleb
quote:
Where is this information coming from?
The SOS testified at the legislature. I watched it.
The 600,000 is an estimate by the Louisiana Citizens for Election Integrity who have been diligently studying data directly from the SOS office for several years now.
quote:
It’s hard for me to believe that 21% are dead.
They aren't all dead. It's also people who have moved and fake registrations with addresses at places like UPS stores, vacant lots, vacant buildings, or long closed homeless shelters. Almost 600 people were found to be registered in just one vacant building in New Orleans.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:21 pm to Bourbon Bebe
Now voter rolls with dead people or people who don't live in the jurisdiction anymore that's a completely different issue
But I was merely responding to the non-citizens voting issue in this thread
I did a lot of work with Catherine and Truth Vote eighteenish years ago on cleansing the voter rolls
Now getting dead people and people who have moved off the voting rolls needs to be done better; we did that in Texas, a project I worked on for years
Texas has done so well that they're now spending taxpayer dollars needlessly
But I was merely responding to the non-citizens voting issue in this thread
I did a lot of work with Catherine and Truth Vote eighteenish years ago on cleansing the voter rolls
Now getting dead people and people who have moved off the voting rolls needs to be done better; we did that in Texas, a project I worked on for years
Texas has done so well that they're now spending taxpayer dollars needlessly
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:25 pm to AGGIES
quote:
AGGIES
Sheesh, that’s some serious mental gymnastics
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:28 pm to AGGIES
quote:
We all know that Registered voters does not equal votes cast.
True enough, but knowing dems, where there is smoke their is probably arson.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:36 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Why won’t they release the data?
Muh SS#!
Posted on 7/21/26 at 3:37 pm to Auburn1968
quote:Less so these days than historically, but both parties used to tell their loyal members to keep their dead parents on the voter roll for as long as possible
True enough, but knowing dems, where there is smoke their is probably arson.
I mean, absolutely, Democrats did it in inner cities, but Republicans were doing it in rural counties, especially in jurisdictions they controlled
Popular
Back to top


0









