- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:05 pm to themunch
quote:
If I were 19, 20 and told I could not buy a gun I would be one POed soldier. That is where I was at that age.
And that would be fine. Guess what you'd be able to do about it.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:08 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Link on that last page has the law itself. I think the retailers are not going to prevail based on a quick read of it.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:16 pm to boosiebadazz
Yeah, I gotcha. Took a quick look on my phone.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:26 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Not the same. If you're going to make points on this subject, make good ones.
quote:
Yeah, I gotcha. Took a quick look on my phone.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:30 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Link on that last page has the law itself. I think the retailers are not going to prevail based on a quick read of it.
Yup. For those that didn't read it....
quote:
But this case isn't a common-law tort case, or a constitutional case, in which courts make decisions about what should or shouldn't be covered -- it's a case applying this particular statute in this particular state. And under this statute, the case seems open and shut for the plaintiff and against Dick's.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 3:30 pm to themunch
quote:
would think the right to own is congruent with purchasing
You don't have the "right" to own a gun or purchase a gun. That would imply that someone else is forced to provide everyone a gun. Which would of course be violating someone else's rights.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 3/6/18 at 4:08 pm to MrLarson
That doesn't negate any point I've made. At all.
Really, I was pointing out that I don't care about that...
Really, I was pointing out that I don't care about that...
Posted on 3/6/18 at 4:13 pm to MrLarson
Normally I'm against these type lawsuits but the plaintiff has a valid case here.
Posted on 3/6/18 at 4:17 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
against legal adults who wish to excercise their right to bare arms
They aren’t selling sleeveless tees anymore either?
Posted on 3/6/18 at 4:23 pm to MrCarton
quote:
just because the left thinks this makes sense, doesn't mean the right should adopt it and use it against them.
Why not?
Posted on 3/6/18 at 4:27 pm to bamafan1001
quote:because it actually beneficial to leftists that right wingers start acting like left wingers. I feel like I shouldn't have to explain that.
Why not?
Posted on 3/10/18 at 8:52 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
What are these UNprotected classes?
Cops are being refused service in certain restaurants and coffee shops across the country.
Posted on 3/10/18 at 11:24 pm to HonoraryCoonass
This is why Gorsuch was elected to the Supreme Court.
He will make new law in here!
He will make new law in here!
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News