- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:06 pm to BBONDS25
It’s a theory obviously, just like yours. You may be right, I might be right. Let’s continue to engage in a debate but trying to ram your point in by being a prick doesn’t help.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:07 pm to GumboPot
I’ve seen that. It doesn’t mean they could move them at the top of the pyramids. Once again guys, this is a debate that neither of us know the answer to. Much like the existence of God.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:07 pm to GumboPot
Those stones are tiny compared to the ones at the pyramid. That doesn’t prove anything.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:08 pm to TyOconner
quote:
I won’t do your homework
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:08 pm to TyOconner
quote:
this is a debate that neither of us know the answer to. Much like the existence of God.
Come on now.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:09 pm to TyOconner
quote:
It’s a theory obviously, just like yours.
I didn’t see a theory. What is it, specifically?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:09 pm to Kjnstkmn
When the slaves are building my pyramid, I’ll also want 2 mile shock absorbers.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:10 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
When the slaves are building my pyramid, I’ll also want 2 mile shock absorbers.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:10 pm to TyOconner
quote:
I’m postulating that someone way before them built the pyramids with a process or tools we don’t know about.
There's no evidence to support this and loads of evidence to support that they were built about 4500 years ago with a shitload of slaves, beasts, and simple machines.
Its fun to contemplate, but the complexity of building them has been overblown. The pyramids are big stacks of blocks, stacked in a way that allowed them to build the largest thing they could conceive at that time. There was no advanced civilization prior to, there was no mythical tool, nothing of that nature. Shitload of slaves, shitload of time, shitload of money.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:11 pm to GumboPot
Alright fellas, have fun with the echo chamber. God forbid there be an alternative explanation that fits the mold. Sure, you all may very well be right, but I also find it interesting to entertain other theories when nothing has been proven.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:11 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
2 km deep cylindrical shock pillars found below pyramids

Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:12 pm to TyOconner
quote:
It’s a theory obviously, just like yours. You may be right, I might be right. Let’s continue to engage in a debate but trying to ram your point in by being a prick doesn’t help.
If I told you my theory is that the earth is flat and that it’s a theory just like yours…would you call me a moron are think our “theories” were of equal validity?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:12 pm to BBONDS25
No because that has been proven.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:12 pm to Kjnstkmn
I wonder how heavy a fluid they used and if it was OBM or WBM.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:13 pm to TyOconner
quote:
Once again guys, this is a debate that neither of us know the answer to. Much like the existence of God.
It's a debate that you don't know the answer to. The answer is very apparent to those of us who build things.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:13 pm to TyOconner
quote:
Alright fellas, have fun with the echo chamber
quote:
God forbid there be an alternative explanation that fits the mold.
You haven’t offered one.
quote:
entertain other theories
By all means. We are waiting.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:14 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
That’s where it gets tough to talk about it, and why I reference the God discussion. You have zero proof, and neither do I, but you are certain you are right. I’m saying either of us could be correct, which is irrefutable considering there is no proof.
Back to top


2





