- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 16th, 17th or 19th Amendment: which is the worst?
Posted on 1/13/19 at 2:31 pm to udtiger
Posted on 1/13/19 at 2:31 pm to udtiger
quote:
Adding an illogical, emotion-driven element to the voting population is the reason for a lot of the current ills in society.
Ironically,that sentiment sort of bolsters extreme feminist propaganda.
Posted on 1/13/19 at 2:35 pm to udtiger
The worst constitutional amendment is the 14th and it is not close.
Posted on 1/13/19 at 2:58 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Of course they did, politicians are thieves for the most part. They’re the ultimate welfare recipients
Agreed. Thats why it has to be wall first other stuff later.
Posted on 1/13/19 at 3:03 pm to bmy
quote:
i don't think you thought this through.. unless you think a law banning heterosexuals from voting would be legal
That has to be a joke?
Posted on 1/13/19 at 3:23 pm to udtiger
The 19th is ground zero for our current problems - The 17th would not have had the terrible impact is has if not for the 19th give the 'emotional voters' the drivers seat.
Posted on 1/13/19 at 3:52 pm to bmy
quote:
link? women seem to be doing pretty damn well
Its hard to even know where to begin with how catastrophic modern feminism is for society. I guess I'll start with the break up of the nuclear family.
quote:
The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fathers typically offer economic stability, a role model for boys, greater household security, and reduced stress for mothers. This is especially true for families with adolescent boys, the most crime-prone cohort. Children from single-parent families are more prone than children from two-parent families to use drugs, be gang members, be expelled from school, be committed to reform institutions, and become juvenile murderers.
An extensive body of research tells us that children do best when they grow up with both biological parents in a low-conflict marriage…. Thus, it is not simply the presence of two parents, as some have assumed, but the presence of two biological parents that seems to support child development.
LINK
There's almost countless studies that show, contrary to what feminists have been saying for my whole life, that a traditional family structure(two married biological parents) is by far the best way to raise children.
Popular
Back to top


0





