- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zeiss Conquest 3x9x40 vs Leupold VX-II 3x9x50
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:14 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:14 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
0
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:44 pm to Tigah32
Strictly between the 2 you mentioned, the Zeiss is the obvious choice. Not even a contest.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:51 pm to Tigah32
quote:
Brothers got a VX1 and I have a Prostaff. Leupolds lowest class and Nikons mid level class.
The rifleman is lower quality than the VXI when it comes to leupolds.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:23 pm to Tigah32
quote:
Thanks man! I've been reading that the Conquest blows leupolds out of the water.
No. And I have both. The vx2 and the conquest are actually pretty close though.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:28 pm to INFIDEL
There are just so many different models and tiers. Nobody is compsring apples to apples. What one person thinks is par, the next sees completely different.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:33 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
Look at Steiner too. That reentered the U.S. market, and they have been received great reviews. My next purchase.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:36 pm to wpsnickers
I just replied in the other thread. Ima keep all future post here. My next high dollar glass will be a S&B though. I do need a small 1x4 or so though. Looking at Leupold and Vortex for that.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:44 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
I think everyone here would serve themselves well by giving the Sightron S II or III a try. Excellent glass.
Eta: the S I I have on my 7-08 Axis is better than any Monarch I've owned. It's $100. Not in the price range of the OP's inquiry, I know. Just sayin...
Eta: the S I I have on my 7-08 Axis is better than any Monarch I've owned. It's $100. Not in the price range of the OP's inquiry, I know. Just sayin...
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:48 pm to beHop
On phone. 100 or 1000?
Posted on 10/27/13 at 9:09 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
One hundred.
I couldn't be more pleased with that rig. Performs really well in low light.
My BIL has a Zeiss Conquest. We put them side by side last year at dusk.
He couldn't put it down. I could tell he was pissed I spent 1/4 what he did and had similar performance. The Zeiss is a bit crisper image but I'm pleased with mine. To each his own though. Some guys just feel the need to spend $$$$ on glass and everything else is shite.
I couldn't be more pleased with that rig. Performs really well in low light.
My BIL has a Zeiss Conquest. We put them side by side last year at dusk.
He couldn't put it down. I could tell he was pissed I spent 1/4 what he did and had similar performance. The Zeiss is a bit crisper image but I'm pleased with mine. To each his own though. Some guys just feel the need to spend $$$$ on glass and everything else is shite.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News